Au contrare, mon ami. I read the article, from several sources. I’m just not naive.
If what she says is true, why wouldn’t the fee go straight to those charities, or failing that, why wouldn’t she provide some accounting thereof? You do realize, don’t you, that this would be the most effective way to go with it, right? Running the fee through her bank account means she is tax-liable for the income. Even if she donated the whole lot to charity, her tax liability is still more than if she simply had them donate that amount straight to the charities.
For the record, I’m no Dem troll. I have no dog in the race. Likewise, I don’t simply take a person’s word for things either. You can believe what you want, as I know you will and do, but do not presume to think that because Sarah said so, it is so.
She is not running the money through her account...why don’t you go read more info before you say something, you obviously got caught reading the excerpts and assume she didn’t say anything about it, but you keep tripping up and getting in trouble, stop.