Posted on 02/01/2010 12:43:05 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
For asking what happened?
Are you a Bush fan? Something smells here.
He just said ‘dozens’ of MSM news sources reported wiretapping story.
He cant answer many of the questions on Hannity for legal purposes. Did you hear the charges?
Now I remember you. You are a birth-certificate-er. If I was from KOS, the first thing I would do is pose as a BC nutcase like you. That is the MSNBCs gravy train.
Newsflash! You BC nuts havent bothered O at all. You should have got the message when only MSNBC would cover you and Coulter disowned you as 'nutcases'
The government might have a case if they used false pretenses to enter a space they would not have been admitted to as general public. The senator's office was open to the general public at the time they entered.
Talking points. Have fun.
What law did they break? Give us a statute.
I agree with you. O’Keefe is a silly young poseur...perhaps he should be auditioning for a TV reality show.
I put him in the same category as the Heenes. Just another attention whore.
The media should ignore him.
He is an ambarrassment to the Conservative movement.
Birth-Certificater ! Dan Rather can type you up one for O.
Dem panic! Anti-tea-party ads tied to Obama eligibility
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | February 01, 2010 | Chelsea Schilling
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2442333/posts
Title 18. Section 1036
§ 1036. Entry by false pretenses to any real property, vessel, or aircraft of the United States or secure area of any airport or seaport
How Current is This?
(a) Whoever, by any fraud or false pretense, enters or attempts to enter—
(1) any real property belonging in whole or in part to, or leased by, the United States;
(2) any vessel or aircraft belonging in whole or in part to, or leased by, the United States;
(3) any secure or restricted area of any seaport, designated as secure in an approved security plan, as required under section 70103 of title 46, United States Code, and the rules and regulations promulgated under that section; or
(4) any secure area of any airport,
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
(b) The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) of this section is—
(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, if the offense is committed with the intent to commit a felony; or
(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or both, in any other case.
(c) As used in this section—
(1) the term “secure area” means an area access to which is restricted by the airport authority, captain of the seaport, or a public agency; and
(2) the term “airport” has the meaning given such term in section 47102 of title 49.
If the intent was to commit a crime the government has a solid case otherwise it’s a political prosecution if they follow through. I look for them to drop the case because they have already tried the case in the media with the help of their friends in the MSM.
Why can’t I find Breitbart’s FULL SPEECH to the Tea Party Convention (Nashville)?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.