Skip to comments.
Scientists broke the law by hiding climate change data: ...won't be prosecuted
The UK Daily Mail ^
| 1/28/10
| David Derbyshire
Posted on 01/29/2010 8:08:50 AM PST by Reaganesque
Scientist at the heart of the 'Climategate' email scandal broke the law when they refused to give raw data to the public, the privacy watchdog has ruled.
The Information Commissioner's office said University of East Anglia researchers breached the Freedom of Information Act when handling requests from climate change sceptics.
But the scientists will escape prosecution because the offences took place more than six months ago.
The revelation comes after a string of embarrassing blunders and gaffes for climate scientists and will fuel concerns that key researchers are too secretive and too arrogant.
It will pile pressure on the director of the university's climate change unit, Professor Phil Jones, who has stood aside while an investigation is carried out, and make it harder for him to return.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anglia; crime; cru; scientists
So, not only are these people scientifically negligent, but criminally as well.
To: Reaganesque
The scientists should be the least of our concerns. I want to know who wanted the warming data and why.
2
posted on
01/29/2010 8:12:38 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: Reaganesque
They sould be sentenced to spend a year in an actual greenhouse.
3
posted on
01/29/2010 8:15:40 AM PST
by
Huskrrrr
To: Reaganesque
Global Warming was a scam that would make Madoff blush. People need to go to jail.
4
posted on
01/29/2010 8:19:11 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(Once the field is level, a global Marxist state is just a few hundred million dead malcontents away.)
To: Reaganesque
5
posted on
01/29/2010 8:19:28 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(Free the Navy Seals)
To: cripplecreek
That is the bottom line. Surest way is through prosecution of the scientist, facts will come out.
It is an interesting thing...make a misrepresentation that others bank on to the SEC and they are on you now!
This effects money, politics and the global future.
To sit back and let a big ponzi/ 4-19 scheme go by is ridiculous.
This too probably leads right back to the presidents nefarious agenda of dismantling, dhiminishing and margininalization of the US of A..
To: cripplecreek
All you have to do is look at the “solutions” to AGW and who is implementing them to know “who”,
and the “why” is the same “why” as has always existed - to control people and empower themselves.
7
posted on
01/29/2010 8:23:33 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: MrB
Once you price CO2 and put a price on it, you find, as you would with any other product, it tends to be rationed. We as a people on this planet have lived under the false concept that air and water were free. And weve learned with a planet of 7 billion people, that we have to ration these precious goods. And the good old price system is the best way to do it.
Richard Sandor, father of the carbon market.
It should be noted that Obama sat on the board of directors at the Joyce foundation when they gave Sandor money to found the Chicago Climate exchange. (CCX)
8
posted on
01/29/2010 8:36:57 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: Reaganesque
Too bad they can’t be sued in a class action.
9
posted on
01/29/2010 8:38:46 AM PST
by
GloriaJane
(Pro-Choice = Pro-Death........ Pro-Life = Pro-LIFE!)
To: cripplecreek
This is what happens when the criminally insane are left to wander the streets.
10
posted on
01/29/2010 8:58:06 AM PST
by
Myrddin
To: Reaganesque; Para-Ord.45; Desdemona; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; mmanager; enough_idiocy; ...
11
posted on
01/29/2010 9:16:40 AM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(FReepers were opposed to Obama even before it was cool to be against Obama.)
To: Reaganesque
"So, not only are these people scientifically negligent, but criminally as well." But this finding should be more than sufficient for the university to justify firing them. The only thing that saved them from criminal prosecution was the "statute of limitations" built into the law.
To: Reaganesque
Why won’t they be prosecuted?
13
posted on
01/29/2010 10:40:28 AM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: freekitty
The statute of limitations for this crime, six months, has expired.
14
posted on
01/29/2010 10:48:50 AM PST
by
Reaganesque
("And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.")
To: Reaganesque
The statute of limitations for this crime, six months, has expired.”
“Look guys and girls. We had to make it illegal, but you only have to hide it for six months. Anybody can hide something for six months.”
15
posted on
01/29/2010 10:56:53 AM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
To: Reaganesque; xcamel; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; Fred Nerks; steelyourfaith; NormsRevenge; Oynx; ...
Now that is Ugly,...that all of them are getting away with this.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson