Senator Patty Murray Puts 2,000 Jobs at Risk in State of Washington
Posted on 01/28/2010 12:40:27 PM PST by Maelstorm
She should ask Osama bin Laden to come and help her build some infrastructure there.
She is up for reelection this year.
I have a theory that some of what we have seen lately(Brown winning in Mass. and the GOP loss in NY-23) is that voters just no longer enjoy liberal females.
Murray & Boxer will highlight whether this is true later this year, as will Blanche Lincoln and Gillibrand.
Heck, even here in Texas, the (formerly) popular Kay Bailey Hutchison is running second to Perry for Governor. While she is the most conservative female in the Senate, she would not make the top 1/3 of Senate Conservatives list.
Oh you bet I will do everything in my power to see Patty packing her bags.
Say WA? Evergreen State ping The only people that are possibly dumber that Patty Murray are Seattle drivers. Complete idiots!!
Ping to my posting at #6.
The only comment I have about this man is that he has no voting history, as he has never held public office.
Sure, he reads like a conservative’s dream but words are cheap.
“The only people that are possibly dumber that Patty Murray are Seattle drivers. Complete idiots!!”
#1: Not turning into the lane closest to them. (In my old truck I would make a point to turn right into my lane as someone was turning left to make the point that they need to STAY in their lane. In my new one - not so much!)
#2: On a left turn green arrow, you do NOT need to slow down to see if the other cars will be coming at you. Especially if you are the third car in line!
#3: The left lane on the highway is for passing. Can you PLEASE be 50 feet in front or behind the car to your right and go the same speed rather than next to it on the left?
is that voters just no longer enjoy liberal females........
Martha Coakley croaked. You are right. Our heavy dose of economic reality is turning Americans sour on pie_in_the_sky logic deprived females. I predict a trend. Women won’t vote for these floaters either
The GOP needs more candidates with testosterone like Scott Brown. The liberal women voted for him and partly due to times being tough
You beat an Obama with an Obama. Obama was the big image candidate with a thin resume...who says we can’t do the same? Image image image image
No, Dennis, we shouldn’t do that because that is how liberals snooker Republicans into voting for them and sending them off to Congress!
The pubbies are just Liberal-lite, so WTF difference does it make?
I gave up voting. Everybody who votes is voting for the candidate who will give them something for free. Everybody who runs for office is willing to make whatever off the wall promises, to whatever groups, and pledge a whole ton of stuff they don’t even have or control, in order to get elected.
The federal government was never supposed to do anything that benefited a specific person. They were supposed to do things for the “general welfare”.
That means things like the National Weather Service, the CDC, that kind of stuff.
If anybody disagrees, flame away!!
I’m kind of sympathizing with Scythian these days, politics ain’t worth the grief, because they’re going to be corrupt SOB’s no matter what we do...
Turnabout is fairplay
I would love to beat the Democrats at their cynical game
And do it by promoting image candidates
If you don’t want to vote you should be on some other website in line with your interests and hobbies
Good riddance, Patty.
Ask Baynative. He has his fingers on the pulse.
I wouldn’t want you in MY foxhole! I’d be doing all the fighting, whilst you’d be doing all the whining!
WHOever is in office should have his / her feet to the fire DAILY! It’s OUR country, dammit!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
