Video: Juan Williams Rips Obama For Criticizing SCOTUS (Circular Firing Squad Watch)

Fox News ^ | 1/27/10 | Juan Williams

[careyb]

A broken clock...

[starman]

That was my immediate thought when I learned that she would be absent from the address. She now sees O as vulnerable, so get ready for her to challenge him in 2012.

[listenhillary]

That hasn’t stopped her yet.

[Condor51]

*** But seriously... A CENTURY???!?!?!?!? Why hasn't anyone else picked up on that? CFR has been in place for 9 years? ***

No offense. but yes almost a century. There have been campaign finance laws against companies and corporations donating that go back to the Woodrow Wilson₍₁₎ era. Glenn Beck's mentioned it on his TV show

CFR on the other hand just added more unconstitutional limits, like the black out period prior to an election. CFR was really the McCain-Feingold Incumbent Protection Act.

(1) Woodrow Wilson was more than just an overt racist. He was one evil sob, an early San Fran Nan type 'progressive'. (proto marxist)

[highlander_UW]

No offense. but yes almost a century. There have been campaign finance laws against companies and corporations donating that go back to the Woodrow Wilson(1) era.

You are correct, a century. Although, from what I've read elsewhere, the SCOTUS didn't throw out the old laws but simply addressed the McCain/fiengold one. So if what I've read is correct, Obama is again lying on this issue.

[Leroy S. Mort]

Who does this guy think he is? Andy Jackson?

[Hardastarboard]

he has been alot more balanced on his political views and engages in less hypocrisy . . . . So I listen more to Juan now

Never thought I'd say this, but I agree with you. Juan is almost sounding like an Inside the Beltway "conservative" like George Will. He still defends liberals and liberal view points, but he's occasionally startlingly rational for a lib.

[Graybeard58]

Does this Ivy Legue educated fool not know the difference between a century and a decade?

You're asking this about someone who doesn't know how many states are in the U.S.

In all seriousness, I would know this, no matter how "tired" I was and even no matter how drunk I was. It's one of those automatic things.

Exactly as Don Imus said of Obama:

0bama's not just stupid; He’s Jimmy Carter stupid

[green iguana]

Could you wait another 3 years on that wish please?

[rintense]

But weren’t the overturned parts more part of McCain-Feingold?

[gibtx2]

how could the obama administration win any supreme court ruling after that.

[gibtx2]

how could the obama administration win any supreme court ruling after that.

[tgusa]

Ding ding ding, we have a winner! No more calls please....

[KStorm]

how could the obama administration win any supreme court ruling after that.

Because the high court doesn't serve at the behest of the Social Engineer-In-Chief, they will continue to act as usual, despite 0bama's mudslinging. Even though the court has made decisions I don't like, I trust more in the integrity of the court's decision-making process than I do the executive branch.

[gibtx2]

the answer is they can not ..

[dennisw]

I bet the Supremos are wishing they demanded to see that Birth Certificate now...

You betcha!!!

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Obama is a street thug.”

Obama is an effeminate wimp punk, who has been given a free ride all of his life by powerful white liberals, and powerful ivy league institutions. I doubt Obama has a Stanford-Binet IQ above 100-105. Somebody prove me wrong!

[RipSawyer]

Do you think it could really be three digits?

[MozarkDawg]

But seriously... A CENTURY???!?!?!?!? Why hasn't anyone else picked up on that? CFR has been in place for 9 years? Does this Ivy Legue educated fool not know the difference between a century and a decade?

Thank you, rintense, I'm bananas myself that every mention of this, it's all Alito and how offensive that was and no notice that this legislation was written by a couple of guys sitting in the House chamber, right there, they haven't been dead for decades. Cheez whiz!!!

[rintense]

I KNOW!!!! Even Rush pointed out Obama’s reference was completely false as the SCOTUS didn’t even touch the foreign influence aspect.

[stephenjohnbanker]

100-105 ain’t nuthin write home about ;-)