Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Brown for marriage amendment [another third partyist meme goes down in flames]
Renew America ^ | 25 January 2010 | Gary Swank

Posted on 01/25/2010 6:35:29 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

It was mistakenly reported by some newsfeeds that Scott Brown voted against the Massachusetts Marriage Amendment. Fact: he voted for the Massachusetts Marriage Amendment in 2007.

Per Baptist Press' Michael Foust: "Brown opposes 'gay marriage' and the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) and supports the military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy and the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

"'Scott Brown not only voted against our community, but he did so unequivocally, proudly and loudly,' Arline Isaacson, chairwoman of the Massachusetts Gay & Lesbian Political Caucus, told Keen News Service. 'Brown voted at least 20 times against marriage equality, over and over again.'

Brian Brown, the executive director of the National Organization for Marriage, saw it much differently, calling the election 'a victory for marriage.'

"'The support of the people of Massachusetts for traditional marriage was clearly a factor in this election as marriage supporters turned out to elect Scott Brown to the United States Senate,' Brian Brown said in a statement."

When it comes to Brown and pro-life issues, Brown is not fully pro-life but he does support pro-lifers regarding endorsing parental notification laws, opposing partial-birth abortion, opposing tax moneys paying for abortions. and opposing the so-called Freedom of Choice Act.

Read "Brown win a setback for gay activists, liberal causes" at http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=32084


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: doma; homosexualagenda; marriageamendment; protectmarriage; scottbrown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: cmj328
"That would make an amendment necessary to keep gay marriage out of Texas, for example. "

I understand your angst...
However, in a Republic, as envisioned by the Founders under the original Constitution, it is up to the people of Texas to keep pervert marriage out of the state.

If there is even the slightest hope that the Republic (and the individual freedoms and liberties now deceased) is to be restored, we must not add any more coffin nails.

21 posted on 01/26/2010 2:05:37 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

it means i think he is a democrat


22 posted on 01/26/2010 2:10:48 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

So Texas should nullify a possible SCOTUS decision and Obama will order in the Airborne and then you have a Constitutional crisis. I sure hope that ends well.


23 posted on 01/26/2010 11:58:58 PM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; mlizzy

This goes along with what you had learned about his being pro-abortion.

I am sadly disappointed in this man.


24 posted on 01/27/2010 12:01:30 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmj328
"So Texas should nullify a possible SCOTUS decision and Obama will order in the Airborne and then you have a Constitutional crisis. I sure hope that ends well. "

Hmmmm! Hot sure how SCOTUS and the Airborne are relevant to this discussion.

We were discussing states rights under the 10th and the responsibility of one state to not impose, via Constitutional Amendment, a political or moral solution on all the other states just because of the inability to solve its own problem.

25 posted on 01/27/2010 1:34:57 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

YOU’RE NOT HAVING A CLUE HERE.


26 posted on 01/27/2010 5:12:46 AM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA--a/k/a ObamaCare--or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson