Posted on 01/23/2010 8:45:14 PM PST by Silly
Raymond W. Kelly’s remarks Thursday to The New York Young Republican Club started out sounding very boilerplate – like a speech by any of the City’s mayors, police officials, and tourism execs: “Crime is down, tourism is up, come to Times Square and see a show.” So why had the NY Post’s Maggie Haberman announced his appearance as “unusual” and “surprising”?
By the time it was over, it was clear why. We had witnessed this politically independent, world-class police commissioner quietly employ a few dry statistics and facts to slide an anvil off a ledge, allowing gravity to deliver its full weight upon Barack Obama’s head.
New York, “a shining city upon a hill,” has just surpassed Orlando as the number one tourist destination in America, we learn from Mr. Kelly. It is a city so increasingly safe that when crime is rising elsewhere, we are setting new low records for murders-per-million. But it is still under such a severe and constant threat that its streets are crawling, at any given moment, with 1500 to 2000 highly sophisticated radiation detectors, and crammed with live-monitored surveillance cameras downtown (and soon to reach to 60th Street).
A city evidently so safe, prepared, and teeming with carefree tourists that the President of the United States has unilaterally decided it should – no, must – play host to terrorist Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s upcoming “criminal” trial in lower Manhattan. Obama, hiding behind the singularly unserious Eric Holder, has recklessly painted an enormous target on NYC’s back, and feverishly directed the attention of our most lethal enemies to its bull’s-eye – against the wishes of its residents and leaders.
“We were not consulted,” Kelly said tersely of the decision. He stated that the trial “will raise the threat level of this city,” a threat that “will not fade any time soon.” And it affects more than lower Manhattan, we learned. “We will have to look at the entire city as a potential target.”
The audience was stunned. Then Kelly opened the floor to questions.
Every audience response which followed – if my memory and others’ is correct – was about terrorism in general and the KSM trial in particular.
One man asked about neighborhood block-watching, especially in light of the unmarked van that recently went unnoticed in Times Square for at least two days. We were assured such strategies are still relevant, and that Kelly and the City are tuned into citizen input. A woman in the audience confirmed the City’s credibility in this regard. She related that after witnessing suspicious activity, she was greeted with ho-hums (and zero follow-up) by every Federal agency she notified, but was taken very seriously by NYPD, and assured that her report was being sent straight to intel. It was obvious who is listening to 3 a.m. calls, and who is snoozing.
The evening’s high point occurred when Marion D.S. Dreyfus rose to her feet and literally begged Kelly to advise the crowd what we could all do – in addition to our unheeded calls and letters – to force Obama to scrap his KSM & Co. showcase in lower Manhattan. Her question sparked thunderous applause from the young professionals.
Kelly’s answer included a faint “Ray” of hope: Michael Isikoff’s recent Newsweek report of whispers that the trial plan is “potentially in jeopardy.” Isikoff had made this known well before the January 19 Senate Dem-olition, so in the post-Brown climate, what senior officials were leaking anonymously may soon appear on the record. It cannot help that lower Manhattan’s Community Board 1 is likely to unanimously reject the trial next week, and demand that Holder move it to a non-residential location.
What does Ray Kelly know that Obama, Holder, and Napolitano don’t? Clearly, a great deal. The Vietnam combat veteran and gifted security heavyweight is celebrated and trusted by the people responsible for keeping New York safe – at least those outside this administration. This cannot be said of Team Obama.
Club president Lynn Krogh, likely unaware what Kelly was planning to say, had reminded her members moments earlier that Scott Brown’s Tuesday victory is proof of the people’s power in 2010, and that what happened in Massachusetts can happen in New York. Let’s hope the crowd recognized that this includes the power to shake the White House out of its current coma, so it abandons its outrageous plan to endanger us all for ideology’s sake.
But it ain't over yet. Three years to go, and that rat is still plenty dangerous.
I always liked Ray. Like Bernie K. Too.
THANKS
Think he might challenge Schmucky or Gillibrand?
While this is encouraging, Kelly is a big-time gun-grabber, so I’ll remain suspicious of him.
It’s horrible for black Americans that this piece of tripe was the first “black” president. It would also be horrible for women if hillary were the first “female” president.
Yes, but if he is de-fanged come November, like some of us believe can happen..... we a least have a modicum of a chance to make him a sick, lame duck, and not dangerous at all.
“While this is encouraging, Kelly is a big-time gun-grabber, so I’ll remain suspicious of him.”
YES
Ray Kelly nailed it.
Wasn’t Ray a Marine as his son who was on FOX
Colonel, Vietnam combat veteran, 30 years of service.
Obama has handed his enemies everything they need to win. I’ve never seen a politician ever setup himself and his party to fail so entirely. George Bush sure did try and Clinton did an excellent job of it in 1994 and Carter wasn’t a slouch but Obama is just political magic. Everything has backfired and he just doesn’t get it. The problem is he has positioned himself between his opponents and his base. He moves towards his oponents and his base leaves him. He has no way of pleasing them. He has managed with all his genius to get himself and his party into the perfect no win situation.
America is on the rise!
As horrible as Hillary is, I sometimes wish she was president instead of Obama. How horrible is that!???
Two New York senate seats are up for grabs in 2010. The GOP candidates need to make use of this Ogabe initiative as a wedge issue. Where does Schumer stand? Where does Gillibrand stand? If New York’s senators, who are of the same party as the president, can’t make this go away, then what’s the point of them being in office?
The city of New York may not like what Obama is doing with this trial but I’ll bet 80% voted for him.
*************
. . . and donated to his campaign. Like the ole saying goes; You get what you pay for. Buck-up New Yawk!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.