Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/23/2010 4:52:48 AM PST by Cheap_Hessian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Cheap_Hessian

Once again the commie in the big house shows his utter distain and hatred for our constitution.


2 posted on 01/23/2010 4:54:29 AM PST by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian
What a flipping hypocrite. This man had millions pumped into his campaign from foreign sources, which is totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL and then he has the audacity to question the Justice's ruling?

The Schmuck needs to shut up. The people have spoken in three BLUE states, but yet he keeps running that ignorant mouth.

3 posted on 01/23/2010 4:57:17 AM PST by Paige ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian

I was astounded at the squeals of horror, from every leftist squeaky wheel on the radio following the decision. While on the right, they were explaining the “book banning” issue addressed by the court and which caused the court great concern such that they were literally forced to make the decision they did based on the first amendment, nothing of explanation was taking place on the left just mindless squealing about how could the court undo what congress had made law.


4 posted on 01/23/2010 4:58:16 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian

I would have been surprised if he didn’t complain about it.


5 posted on 01/23/2010 4:58:53 AM PST by ThreePuttinDude (o).. Elect Marco Rubio in 2010 .. (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian

“He also suggested the ruling could jeopardize his domestic agenda.”

Exactly why this ruling is such a Godsend. Thanks to the 5 reasonable thinkers on the SCOTUS! At least they know what the meaning of Liberty is.

What an arrogant SOB this BHO really is, Jeopardize your domestic agenda, I SURE AS HADES HOPE SO!


6 posted on 01/23/2010 5:00:28 AM PST by Shady (The Fairness Doctrine is ANYTHING but fair!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian

“”This ruling strikes at our democracy itself,” said Obama.”

WOW!

What strikes at our democracy is the legislation itself! The ruling helps restore it!


7 posted on 01/23/2010 5:00:31 AM PST by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian
Here's the previous running thread
9 posted on 01/23/2010 5:00:56 AM PST by ASA Vet (Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian
Presidents to my recollection do not usually comment on Supreme Court Rulings. This guy can't keep his mouth shut and remember the separation of powers and the three branches. Their are 6th and 7th graders studying American History that know more that he....
11 posted on 01/23/2010 5:03:39 AM PST by taildragger (Palin/Mulally 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian

Karma is beautiful. One day after he goes after the banks, costing investors billions in capital.

You think the first “special interests” who come out with some ads will be banks/investors - splaining to the public how Obama’s plan has already cost 401ks billions in equity.


12 posted on 01/23/2010 5:06:18 AM PST by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian
Obama blasts Supreme Court campaign finance ruling

Can't this guy let one day pass without attacking a consitutionally protected right?

Of course not. Silly me...*sigh*

14 posted on 01/23/2010 5:07:49 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian

And how many hundreds of millions in unidentified donations in ‘08 allowed BO to have so much campaign cash that he didn’t have to abide by McCain-Feingold? I have yet to hear any media type ask him that question.
If labor unions, such as SEIU, can support candidates with millions of dollars, then corporations should be able to contribute, too. That’s why the Dems are howling.


15 posted on 01/23/2010 5:09:00 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian

All the more reason to get him out of there before he has a chance to put more of his own people on there. Pray for the good health of the 5 who voted right.


16 posted on 01/23/2010 5:13:43 AM PST by Past Your Eyes (You don't have to be ignorant to be a Democrat...but if you are...so what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian

This ruling from the Supreme Court restores the basic right of free speech to corporations and labor unions. Of course, liberals want free speech censored or silenced. We, the People need all the information we can get from many sources so that we can make our own decisions about politics and politicians. Thanks to our Supreme Court for following our Constitution.


18 posted on 01/23/2010 5:17:47 AM PST by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian
"He also suggested the ruling could jeopardize his domestic agenda."

Yay!!!!!!

19 posted on 01/23/2010 5:18:12 AM PST by NoGrayZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian
Last night I had the opportunity to ask a constitutional scholar his take on the ruling and was surprised by what he said. He thinks the court got it wrong and needless to say that is not what I expected. His take on the ruling is the constitution protects free speech as an individual right not a group right. He thought the courts should have put a stop to unions as well as corporations. Individual free speech is what the courts should protect. What happens now when Hugo Chavez run campaign ads thought Citgo? Anyway that kind of took the wind out of my sails.
21 posted on 01/23/2010 5:24:35 AM PST by iamweasle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian

FUBO!!!

1st Amendment a LOT MORE IMPORTANT than YOU are!!!


25 posted on 01/23/2010 5:32:28 AM PST by gwilhelm56 (OBAMA ... Orwell's 1984 was a WARNING ... NOT a TEXTBOOK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian

“couldn’t think of anything more devastating to the public interest.”
How about three more years of this marxist p.o.s. as high poo bah?


28 posted on 01/23/2010 5:37:24 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Get out of the peoples house and take that shelf ass ugly woman with ya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian

Constitutional Law professor, huh?


29 posted on 01/23/2010 5:44:56 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian
"This ruling opens the floodgates for an unlimited amount of special interest money into our democracy," the president said in his weekly radio and Internet message.

What he means is that it opens the floodgates for an unlimited amount of special interest money from "politically incorrect sources".

34 posted on 01/23/2010 6:21:11 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheap_Hessian
"We don't need to give any more voice to the powerful interests that already drown out the voices of everyday Americans," Obama said. "And we don't intend to." -- BHO

This made me chuckle -- I just think back to Carville and whats-his-name shouting down the swifties during the 2004 campaign. The powerful interests are the media companies right now -- MSNBC was formed by GE and Microsoft. It's a trust fund baby who's suffering crib death along with Air America.

Ironic that this case was about Hillary: The Movie, which I remember Dick Morris hawking during the primaries. That DVD could have given us Obama because it was released so early -- I suggest that we should not meddle in their primaries.

I am so sick of the lies of the left and can now envision an informed and educated electorate. I disagreed with Morris's timing but the concept was great and scalable -- On Demand films detailing a candidates record -- in their own words. Pelosi and Reid must be having nightmares along with Obama if such a thing came to pass (and it will)

I look at all the rich 'fat cat' senators and now Scott Brown and smile. The left has been breathing it's own exhaust for so long, it believes it can get away with anything. This week was monumental for the conservative cause -- be sure to donate to Free Republic!!

35 posted on 01/23/2010 6:37:32 AM PST by DaveMSmith (Pray not for tasks equal to your powers but pray for powers equal to your tasks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson