Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
” a valid exercise of commerce(sic) power”

Unfortunately, we cannot count on Justice Scalia to uphold the Constitution on this. He voted correctly in the Lopez decision, but then, the War on some Drugs got the best of him and the Constitution with the Raich decision, where he voted that the Commerce clause included virtually everything.

Here is an article about it:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=916965

24 posted on 01/22/2010 7:36:23 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Good article. Succinct.

“he Commerce clause included virtually everything.”

That’s the major problem.


27 posted on 01/22/2010 7:46:56 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Thanks. I was going to say that the commerce clause has been used VERY successfully by the Feds to prosecute folks in CA, even though CA passed the Medical Marijuana laws. Here’s where we see a disconnect with SO many people on the “right” side. You can’t regulate some things and enforce it using the commerce clause and not expect it to be used against you in others circumstances you may be bothered by.


90 posted on 01/22/2010 10:39:17 PM PST by LibertyRocks (Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson