Skip to comments.
Early Results in Brown 54 Coakley 45 1% Reporting
Boston Globe ^
Posted on 01/19/2010 5:17:01 PM PST by GQuagmire
click link
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: greatscott; ma2010; massachusetts; scottbrown; upsetwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-155 next last
1
posted on
01/19/2010 5:17:01 PM PST
by
GQuagmire
To: GQuagmire
2
posted on
01/19/2010 5:18:43 PM PST
by
shineon
To: GQuagmire
CaCa! On the local
Brown 52
Coakley 47
$ % precincts in
3
posted on
01/19/2010 5:19:41 PM PST
by
acapesket
To: GQuagmire
Then does Drudge have Coakley up 9000 to 8900? Me think he needs to get off the pot and start updating his numbers. According to Boston.com, it’s Brown’s 22,776 to Coakley’s 18,589, 55% to 45%.
4
posted on
01/19/2010 5:20:01 PM PST
by
pctech
To: GQuagmire
5
posted on
01/19/2010 5:20:14 PM PST
by
Notwithstanding
(Wer glaubt ist nie allein. Who believes is never alone.)
To: GQuagmire
Ouch! And you have to figure that early numbers are Boston-area numbers.
6
posted on
01/19/2010 5:20:21 PM PST
by
mojito
To: shineon
Obermannn is trying to make Brown’s win a racial thing
7
posted on
01/19/2010 5:20:41 PM PST
by
shadeaud
("If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten." -- George Carlin)
To: GQuagmire
Middleton 70-30 Brown 100% reporting
8
posted on
01/19/2010 5:20:54 PM PST
by
GQuagmire
( Angry Scrubwoman: Martha Coakley)
To: acapesket
9
posted on
01/19/2010 5:21:06 PM PST
by
acapesket
To: acapesket
Beat her like a rented cah!
To: Wally_Kalbacken
Demmies are gonna wear this defeat like a cheap suit.
11
posted on
01/19/2010 5:23:07 PM PST
by
ak267
To: GQuagmire
I’m not likin’ these numbers - yet. Coakley is cleaning up in the big cities while Brown is only doing well in the smaller towns...
Too early to tell
12
posted on
01/19/2010 5:23:15 PM PST
by
Paisan
To: GQuagmire
I could live with those numbers.
To: GQuagmire
It’s going to be a wonderful evening. Thanks much for posting that link.
To: GQuagmire
O’Reilly just said his spy says it’s 52-47 for Brown with 4% of the vote in...
IS FR really SLOOOOWWWWW?
15
posted on
01/19/2010 5:23:58 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(Become a Precinct Committee Person/Officer....in the GOP...or do NOT complain.)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
To: GQuagmire
Brown (GOP)52%
30,579 votes
Coakley (Dem.)47%
27,551 votes
Kennedy (Lib.)1%
541 votes
at 7:22 p.m. Central
Boston Globe Numbers
To: shadeaud
Well, you know Keith has to have his excuses ready just in case. And like any other moonbat he's going to find someone (or more) to blame.
To: Paisan
19
posted on
01/19/2010 5:25:25 PM PST
by
achilles2000
(Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
To: GQuagmire
http://www.wbztv.com has streaming video of their commentary and election results for the TV-challenged and the mouse-button-lazy.
They’re already talking of Coakley as the one who “could pull this out” if a whole lot of things go her way, if votes yet to be counted will be from Coakley-friendly areas, etc.
WBZ just reported Brown 52% / Coakley 47% with 5% of precincts reporting.
20
posted on
01/19/2010 5:25:34 PM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-155 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
