Posted on 01/19/2010 5:14:03 PM PST by JeffBoste
Could the Navy power Port-au-Prince from a nuclear submarine
(Excerpt) Read more at ricks.foreignpolicy.com ...
We’ve had portable nuclear generators since the late 1950’s, some of which have powered bases in the Arctic and other regions. However, I don’t see Mr. Obama authorizing their use.
USS Lexington (CV-2) powers Tacoma, 1929:
http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=pf_output.cfm&file_id=5113
eveyone knows the earthquake was because the Haitians were'nt recyling enough...
GO NAVY!
Lexington and Saratoga had turbo-electric drives, where the steam plant (in their case oil-fired as opposed to a nuke) is used to power electric motors that drive the propellers. In cases like that, the electric plant would be large enough to power civilian facilities.
The last turbo-electric US sub was the USS Glenard P. Lipscomb, SSN-685. She was a one-off commissioned in the early 70s and decommissioned and recycled in the 1990s.
Rule of threes:
You can go three weeks with out food,
You can go three days without water,
You can go three minutes without air,
But you probably won't last three seconds without a plan.
Regards,
GtG
Things get done just to get them done without regards to cost or longevity. A ship damaged in combat at sea may get patched up, but those patches won't be very pretty and the ship is sent out again ASAP.
Right now, three or four companies are completely swamped with prepaid orders for small nuclear reactors. These are anywhere from the size of a shipping container to two or three times that large, and can power about five square miles of a modern, first world city, including its industries. Major, power consumptive industries would need their own dedicated reactor.
It has been proposed that one of the smaller, shipping container sized ones could be put on the back of a heavy haul semi trailer, then would be driven into a disaster area, again in a modern country, to act as a “power grid node”, to restore still functional parts of a power grid that had been disconnected from the main grid. This would make regional recovery much faster, if “parts of the city” had power.
This would be much like using a generator to provide power to just your house, during a power outage.
In addition, it would likewise power a second vehicle, that would be a large volume reverse osmosis water purification trailer, that could take available water from whatever source, and produce enough for the personal needs of everyone in the area, to include public showers, field laundromats, and more than enough water to drink.
Unfortunately, Haiti has nothing like a modern power grid in good condition, and what power grid it has likely is now utterly useless and will need to be rebuilt. Not that it will be.
16 posted on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 7:22:33 PM by upstanding
Yes the Navy did do this for Kauai after a storm knocked out the power plant. However, the grid was still operational.
Yes they are. Attack submarines have two in the engine room and one up forward. This is how they connect to the shore connections. These are used to get power from the shore facilities, however it is possible to reverse the power, but there are safety devices installed. In addition to this, if you were to connect this to an entire city it would drain the reactor of a submarine very quickly.
The cooling systems of the reactor rely on the sub being under weigh.
..
No, but for a different reason. As pointed out, you can run a sub’s reactor without the sub itself moving - unlike some earlier surfae ships which did use scoop injection.
but .... (long but follows) the nuke subs only have two relatively small steam turbo-generators. They create 440 volt power - which isn’t isn’t easily compatible with the city’s 60 Hz 120 household and 12,000+ volt distribution systems. Sure, some piers have transformers so the city power gets lowered in voltage to a ship’s voltage requirements (so a ship can turn off its propulsion plant when in port) - but those transformers are limited in size and capacity.
Better to have a cruise ship stop in and use its generators (far larger than a sub!) or an aircraft carrier. Again - you have get the power back FROM the pier to the city.
Best is to let the SeaBee’s or Army build their existing shore-based portable power plants. In other words, use defense dollars (and military time and people!) to help Obama make Obama look good for the media to crow about.
Nuke subs are not the right answer. It would be like plugging an extension cord into the side of a C-5 and running the C-5’s engines to create 120 volts. instead of flying the C-5 to bring in 500 small gas generators. And the trucks and gas carriers to fill them and move the small generator around..
I saw Hertz Equip move in generators and power up a good size town
Haiti definitely needs fresh water at this time...
Any ship with generators and a shore power connection could, in theory, back feed power to the grid.
However:
There needs to be a functioning power distribution grid to take the power.
Ship’s electrical power plants are sized to provide power to the ship, that’s no where near what would be needed to power a shoreside grid. Only a small portion of a shoreside grid could be energized without overloading the ship.
That cruise ship that made the news for pulling in to Haiti would be a much better candidate. Much more hotel power capacity and the generators are probably sized to feed both electric propulsion and the hotel load.
They tried that but every time the sub submerged the GFIC would kick and the whole thing would shut down.
Oh sure, stick a billion dollar Navy, sensitive asset in a hellhole port and plug it into the grid and leave it there as a sitting duck for a while.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.