Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHITE HOUSE BRACING FOR SHATTERING LOSS IN MA (mucho Dem political stupidity needed to lose MA)
1/18/10

Posted on 01/18/2010 4:51:57 PM PST by Liz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: paulycy

On abortion, I think I get what the Catholic bishops do not get: that a big liberal government is a danger to the freedom of religion. Separation of church and state IS necessary for freedom of religion. unless you want the church turned into an instrument of state power.


41 posted on 01/18/2010 5:24:11 PM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Although Marcia Coakley ran a poor campaign.

This election is not about HER! (It’s not even really about Scott Brown) I wish our side would stop taking the bait from the MSM that it is only because of her incompetence that she will lose tomorrow. They have been saying this over and over and over and over.

NO! NO! NO! NO!

This storyline completely downplays the significance of what is truly happening in the most liberal of all states. In a U.S. Senate Seat that has been held by Teddy Kennedy since 1492.

That people across the country, of all backgrounds and party affiliations are fed up with the socialist policies of Øbama, Pelosi & Reid. The people are fed up with them telling us how they are going to run Washington and interfere in our lives - despite our overwhelming opposition.

THIS IS ABOUT CONSERVATISM! THIS IS ABOUT PRO-AMERICAN & PRO-CAPITALIST POLICIES! THIS IS ABOUT TELLING THEM TO STAY THE HELL OUT OF OUR LIVES!

Certainly, Scott Brown turned this statewide special election into a national spectacle, because of his solid opposition to the Obamacare HealthControl legislation, and he is to be commended for it.

However, at the end of the day - this is so much bigger than just one U.S. Senate seat in Massachusetts.

We must counter this falsehood whenever and wherever it is repeated.


42 posted on 01/18/2010 5:25:19 PM PST by adm5 (THE COMING TAX REVOLT SHOULD BE THE LAST THING OBAMA & CO. SHOULD BE WORRIED ABOUT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I will guarentee that he will be one of People’s 50 most beautiful people in their next issue!


43 posted on 01/18/2010 5:27:27 PM PST by copwife (All God's creatures have a place in the choir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

You get it. And I agree.


44 posted on 01/18/2010 5:27:37 PM PST by paulycy (The Liberals' DOUBLE-STANDARDS are HATE CRIMES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lockbar

Gee, that family almost looks “presidential”?
...............................................

Hey if he has no skeletons we could have someone here! Geez, he could take mass. into the GOP column and it’s over. I don’t know if Romney would take Mass any thoughts on that anyone?


45 posted on 01/18/2010 5:27:45 PM PST by toddausauras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3
I hope he wins but I don’t think he is my kind of conservative.

He's a big step up for Mass. It took us a while to slide down into the mess we're in - it's going to take a while to climb out.

The Dems have been operating in increments - we may have to, too.

46 posted on 01/18/2010 5:28:34 PM PST by SCalGal (Friends don't let friends donate to H$U$ or PETA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Liz

“It doesn’t matter.” (Just like New Jersey and Virigina)


47 posted on 01/18/2010 5:30:08 PM PST by clintonh8r (Obama's America: we treat citizens like terrorists, and terrorists like citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport
Helmsley was my landlady. This Coakley gal is no Leona Helmsley.

Leona was better!

48 posted on 01/18/2010 5:30:37 PM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman

“I expect the Dems to dispute the results and go dumpster diving for invalid votes to put Coakley over the top.”

Ya think they’ll get 60,000 of those? (5% margin)...


49 posted on 01/18/2010 5:30:39 PM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Liz

50 posted on 01/18/2010 5:32:48 PM PST by MichaelAsher54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Martha Coakley is the Leona Helmsley of Bay State politics.

I think of her as the Mike Nifong. And yes she ought to be disbarred.

51 posted on 01/18/2010 5:33:31 PM PST by freespirited (People talk about "too big to fail." Our government is too big to succeed. --Chris Chocola)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lockbar; wagglebee; xzins
Gee, that family almost looks “presidential”?

Unlike Abe Lincoln and his family, right?

While I will rejoice that the democrat loses this race, Brown is still pro-abortion and as such I could never vote for him or contribute anything to his campaign.

He might someday undergo a phony change of heart like Romney (another RINO that looks presidential), in order to pacify the base at some point in the future, but I believe that Abortion is a fundamental indicator of a man's heart and I will probably never trust a pro-choice Republican to do the right thing on any issue.

52 posted on 01/18/2010 5:41:59 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; xzins

It concerns me that this victory might conclude some to think that the pro-life platform is now negotiable. And history has taught us that a person who is not a social conservative isn’t really a fiscal conservative either.


53 posted on 01/18/2010 5:46:27 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: PJBankard

I agree that we need to support him. He does want some restrictions on abortion. Just wish he was prolife.


54 posted on 01/18/2010 5:49:26 PM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; xzins

What is a presidential family supposed to “look like” anyway? The Obamas and Clintons “looked” as presidential as the Bushes. The greatest modern president, Ronald Reagan, had a son who wore a tutu (and acted the part).


55 posted on 01/18/2010 5:49:31 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787

Yes I know. He sounds like an “I don’t support it but think it should be kept legal” kind of guy. It does make a difference. He doesn’t seem to love death like liberals do.


56 posted on 01/18/2010 5:50:45 PM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SCalGal

Agreed, it is a step in the right direction.


57 posted on 01/18/2010 5:51:21 PM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
he happens to be pro-abortion,

So was George Herbert Walker Bush, until he received a phone call from Ronald Reagan in 1980.

58 posted on 01/18/2010 5:54:27 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3
He isn’t pro life. I hope he wins but I don’t think he is my kind of conservative.

I refer you to George HW Bush until he got a phone call from Reagan in 1980.

59 posted on 01/18/2010 5:55:59 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Brown is still pro-abortion and as such I could never vote for him or contribute anything to his campaign.

Did you ever vote for George HW Bush? He was pro-abortion until Reagan phoned him in 1980.

60 posted on 01/18/2010 5:58:50 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson