Posted on 01/18/2010 6:06:40 AM PST by Servant of the Cross
When Republicans discuss party Chairman Michael Steele, it often comes down to a conversation about Good Michael versus Bad Michael. The problem is, on any given day, GOP politicos don't know which Michael is occupying the big office at Republican National Committee headquarters.
A lot of people saw it coming in February and March of last year, after Steele narrowly won election as chairman of the 168-member RNC. He made a lot of enemies back then, getting a slow start on the job, leaving top positions unfilled, and committing gaffe after gaffe on TV -- such as calling Rush Limbaugh's program "incendiary" and "ugly" and sitting quietly when an interviewer said the 2008 Republican National Convention "literally looked like Nazi Germany."
But then things got better. Steele filled jobs, got going, and connected with the party's grass roots. His doubters were especially relieved when one of the tests they set for him -- could he help Republicans win governor races in Virginia and New Jersey? -- turned out very, very well. Steele was looking better, even to his toughest critics.
"Initially, I had real doubts about him," says an RNC member who opposed Steele's election as chairman. "But I gave him a chance, and I think he should get some credit. He's talented, a great speaker, brings some nice things to the table."
A brief pause. "And now," the member continues, "he's doing that craziness again."
After a run of Good Michael, in recent weeks, Steele has revived fears of Bad Michael with a media blitz in which he 1) said the Republican Party could not win back the House of Representatives this year; 2) defended his practice of mixing paid speeches with RNC trips; 3) blindsided fellow Republican leaders by releasing a highly opinionated book they weren't expecting; and 4) addressed his critics by saying, "If you don't want me in the job, fire me. But until then, shut up."
Bad Michael is back. "This is not helpful, and nobody thinks it's helpful," says another RNC member who opposed Steele's election. "He needs to understand that."
The politico thinks for a moment and quietly adds, "That doesn't mean he needs to be fired."
And that's the bottom line: Steele's doubters inside the RNC have made their peace with the chairman. Unless he does something totally unexpected and beyond the pale, he is here to stay -- at least through the end of his two-year term.
That's not to say there won't be some frank exchanges of views in the next few weeks. The RNC has a meeting scheduled later this month in Hawaii, and members expect to have a private, face-to-face discussion with Steele about his recent behavior. "After the Rush stuff (last year), he pleaded with us and said, 'I was wrong, I'm going to do better, I'm going to try,'" says the first RNC member, who is expecting a similar scene in Hawaii.
Members want to hear from Steele, but most of all, they desperately want to settle it and get the story out of the media. With midterm elections less than 11 months away and Republicans in position to make major gains in Congress, the last thing they need is the appearance of bickering inside the leading party organization.
"If you have any kind of conversation about any part of this, you don't have the argument out on the front porch," the second RNC member says. "You have it inside, with the doors and windows closed."
They will have much to talk about beyond Steele's recent media appearances. Contributions to the RNC from big donors are down, and critics inside the party say that Steele hasn't done enough to court the party's big-money movers. The RNC had about $23 million in cash when Steele took office; now it has less than $9 million. (Some of that money went into those Virginia and New Jersey victories.)
But the biggest issue at the meeting in Honolulu will be Steele himself. In these critical months before the election, will Republicans be seeing Good Michael or Bad Michael? Steele will no doubt hear again and again that his running commentary on TV and radio is "not helpful."
But at this point, RNC members know that, for better or for worse, they're stuck with their chairman for the rest of the ride. "If he loses, we lose," the second member says. "And we can't afford for him to lose."
The "bad Steele" causes more damage than the "good Steele" can repair.
He sucks. Get rid of him. He may speak well, but he has no charisma and ZERO passion for what really matters. I am tired of the milque toast responses our idiot so-called conservatives RINOs are spewing. After Brown wins and we dismiss the Dems in 2010, it is time to defeat incumbent Repubs in the primaries and replace them. That’ll complete the house cleaning!
It would be better if they could encourage him to leave this position voluntarily if they had some safe carrot to offer him?
I gave up on him at his Rush Remark.
Dumb, Dumb, Dumb.
I don’t care if he’s considered good or bad. I just want someone effective to do the job. Still waiting for that.
we need haley barbour back.
It’s all about Michael. Self centered bastard.
Fire him and get someone loyal to the party.
Haley may run in 2012, and that may not be a bad thing.
How about ‘untrustworthy’ or ‘unreliable’?
In any event - FIRE THE EMPTY SUIT!
Agree on both of these unfortunate points.
Get rid of Juan McAmnesty and you get rid of Steele. AZ must vote out McTraitor.
I am afraid Steele is not bright enough to be consistent.
RNC head is way over his ability and if he is allowed to continue on and the Republicans blow what should be a great year for them because they are unwilling to deal with his removal, the GOP party hacks should permanently change the name to the Stupid Party.
You got that right. A policy guy he's not.
However, I am afraid that you "go to war with the 'army' you got".
IMO Steele is gutless, spineless, and a eunuch! We need a Patton-style, tell it like it is, leader. He needs to go NOW!
How do we get rid of him now??? We need a leader with a steel backbone. A patriot that will tell the MSM and the Elites in DC to go to hell. Don’t Tread on the American People!
“Contributions to the RNC from big donors are down”
I don’t claim to be a big donor, but my money goes directly to candidates, NOT through the RNC.
We need someone heading the party who speaks conservative language all the time, who speaks for smaller government all the time, who speaks out against too much taxation and larger government all the time. When they don't we lose all the time.
Steele is probably a really nice guy, but he shouldn't lead the Party.
Channeling a Steele Supporter: Steele came in at the low ebb of GOP support. Donations down, massive losses in two sequential elections, very little hope all around for the GOP in the near future. In his tenure, he decided to spend almost the entire war chest on the out-of-sequence elections in 2009, specifically VA and NJ. He took heat for that, left the warchest empty. But miraculously, they won! and Steele supporters would say "Miraculously maybe, but Michael Steele's decision to flow in the cash sure helped!" It was a gamble, a drastic one that would have left the party broke and without hope if if failed, but it didn't. Suddenly the momentum is with the GOP, and all things appear possible. Even Mass. might elect a republican! Donations will be back up as people sense hope for the 2010 elections! Steele architected the game changer we needed. Hurrah!
Someone needs to inform the American people just how much each and everyone of us owes to the Constitution. If it were not for the Constitution Michael Steele might well be shining shoes, instead of holding high office.
We are going into a critical election [2010] and the NRC still has Michael Steele as Chairman. He is distrusted by those in the party who man the phones, get out the vote and are passionate - the conservative base. The NRC is blowing its chance to again matter in saving the USA from liberal, socialist statism. The NRC is handing the Democrats two first quarter touchdowns in the biggest Super Bowl on the planet. If you are a FR member and have some influence in a state Republican party or in the national party, please shake up the RNC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.