Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Full-body scanners raising privacy issues
UPI ^ | January 11, 2009

Posted on 01/12/2010 12:46:03 AM PST by myknowledge

WASHINGTON, Jan. 11 (UPI) -- Machines to screen airline passengers can store and transmit images, making them open to possible abuse, a U.S. group critical of full-body scanning says.

The federal Transportation Security Administration currently has about 40 body-scanning machines in operation at 19 U.S airports and wants to add 150 more this year and 300 in 2011, CNN reports. TSA says the scanners are not networked and that each machine works independently without the ability to store or send graphic images of human anatomy.

(Excerpt) Read more at upi.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airportsecurity; fullbodyscanners; nudiecam; privacyinvasion; tsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: vortec94

Give me the option of flying Air-Infidel. Use the Full-body scanners on other more sensitive airlines.

http://warroom.com/images/air-infidel.jpg


21 posted on 01/12/2010 5:04:15 AM PST by greenhornet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

IN my opinion, they should simply have a line for people who do not want to go through the body scanners.

In that line, the screeners can use whatever other methods are necessary, based on the person, to ensure there is no danger. Full-body pat-down, strip search, 20-minute interview, whatever it takes.

I think we should respect the privacy of people who just don’t want to use the fast and easy method.


22 posted on 01/12/2010 6:20:17 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

I think you’d have to be pretty perverted to be sexually aroused by that picture.

And pretty desparate, given the universal availability of images and videos on the internet for the guy at TSA looking to download something to their phone to get off.


23 posted on 01/12/2010 6:24:13 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
We the People must pose "naked" to enter the airport,

Barrack Hussein Obama does NOT have to produce an original birth certificate to enter the Oval Office.

24 posted on 01/12/2010 6:28:13 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greenhornet68

Too bad we don’t have a truly free market and true freedom of association - air infidel would be a great success!


25 posted on 01/12/2010 6:30:39 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

I wonder what health issues, are associated with the machines.


26 posted on 01/12/2010 6:54:06 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I think you’d have to be pretty perverted to be sexually aroused by that picture.

Yep, but if the picture can be downloaded and posted on FR, who knows what else can be done.

27 posted on 01/12/2010 7:24:43 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Prole
It's almost like signing up for a root canal to go on a flight these days.

And about as comfortable.

28 posted on 01/12/2010 7:26:54 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

“Seriously, the pervs at TSA will be active, there can be no doubt.”

That is possibly the only work TSAPersons will be busily and diligently doing.


29 posted on 01/12/2010 11:23:24 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon

That picture is a fake. It is just a photoshopped nude from http://www.photoalto.com/index/fa/c.image/pid/PAA246000018 (NSFW)


30 posted on 01/12/2010 12:36:32 PM PST by dan1123 (Free condoms for teens to have safe sex is like giving them bullet-proof vests for safe gun play)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dan1123
That picture is a fake. Thank you for that information.
31 posted on 01/12/2010 12:57:51 PM PST by Jeff Gordon (Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: WandaM.Nesia
I'm like unmasking the secret capabilities of the body scanner machines that the corporate-controlled MSM flagrantly refuses to reveal.

I'm only 19 years old have never worked with any one of these privacy invaders in my entire life. Just check out my FR page.

32 posted on 01/12/2010 2:33:40 PM PST by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

One the govenrment has all the brain dead Americans used to these devices they can ban guns and have the means to take them. We will be defenseless against their tyranny.


33 posted on 10/03/2010 11:03:24 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“whatever it takes.”

Takes for what, exactly? Why are you on a web site called “Free Republic” when you obviously are demanding a powerful, intrusive, and controlling government?

Maybe you’d prefer each night everyone stand at attention outside their home while government agents search and inspect your house for “contraband”? Perhaps Nazi style Hitler Youth to tattletale on you for saying something naughty against the government so you can be executed? Maybe you’d prefer we all just walk around nude and only in areas and pathways that are government approved just so you can “feel safe”?


34 posted on 10/03/2010 11:08:14 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Takes for what, exactly?

I thought I made that clear in my comments:

In that line, the screeners can use whatever other methods are necessary, based on the person, to

ensure there is no danger. Full-body pat-down, strip search, 20-minute interview, whatever it takes.

My point was simple. The powers that be have decided that keeping planes from blowing up is more important than convenience. I don't like it, but I know that isn't going to change.

So rather than force everybody to use a specific procedure that some don't like, my suggestion is to let people decide how they will be searched, with the realization that some methods take a lot longer.

I think most people would chose the scanner because it's quick.

In order to go to the top of the CN tower in ontario, you have to go into this machine that blows air all around you, and samples it for explosives. "Whatever it takes".

35 posted on 10/03/2010 10:35:56 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson