Just In: Boston Herald Endorses: Scott Brown for U.S. Senate

The Boston Herald ^ | 1/11/2010 | By Boston Herald Editorial Staff

[Dayvester]

Massachusetts voters have to ask themselves a serious question before they head to the polls next week: Are they content with the current state of affairs in Washington?

Are they content with a sweeping health care bill, now being negotiated behind closed doors by principals from only one political party? (So much for a new era of bipartisanship promised by our president.)...

[EveningStar]

Great Scott! :)

[sam_paine]

Well duh. the Herald is not the Globe.

The Globe endorsement would be a earth stopper! =)

[knarf]

we’ll see ... voters here in pennsylvania rejected santorum because he wasn’t conservative enough .... so we got empty headed, empty suit casey.

[pistolpetestoys]

If anybody can post,heres the livelink for the Brown-Coakley debate that starts at 7PM EST

http://www.wbz.com/

[Grunthor]

“voters here in pennsylvania rejected santorum because he...”

.....endorsed that back-stabbing son-of-a-b!tch Spectre over the more conservative Toomey.

[C210N]

But, the Globe did, in fact, endorse Scott Brown. They did not endorse Coakley. If my vote is influenced with endorsements, I’d stop right there, not listen to another one, and vote the way the Boston Globe has suggested: Scott Brown, and NOT Coakley.

[JRochelle]

This is fun to watch. The Brown campaign set a goal of raising 500,000 dollars today. They reached that a while ago.

The reset the goal to $750,000.

They are at $735,640.08 right now.

They are on their way to ONE MILLION DOLLARS!

http://www.brownforussenate.com/red-invades-blue

[jessduntno]

Brown has State troopers backing him instead of the state’s “chief law enforcement officer.”

THAT’S an endorsement...