Posted on 01/11/2010 12:47:03 PM PST by Red Steel
It is my best guess that Obama’s attorneys figured that once Judge Carter dismissed it was over… far from it! Orly has come back with a strong offense. For sure the Justice Department (Obama, et al) is doing its best to stop Judge Carter from approving the transfer to Judge Lamberth in Washington DC. Orly filed a nice response to their opposition.
Below are some highlighted excerpts from the filing:
Orly has pointed out that Judge Carter promised to hear the case on its merits. The Justice Department defending Obama conned the Judge into dismissing and used the excuse of “jurisdiction” claiming only Quo Warranto can be brought in Washington DC.
Orly said, “fine, let’s move the case.” She is asking Judge Carter to move the case to Judge Lamberth’s court in DC. This would serve to best expedite the case, including discovery.
Orly is making sure that Judge Carter is aware of the fact that the Justice Department and Eric Holder have been stalling for many months now. An original Quo Warranto was filed in Judge Taylor’s Washington DC court (he has since retired.. couldn’t stand the heat in my opinion).. that was back in March, 2009. The Justice Department has done everyting in its power to stall, hide, ignore the case..
Orly is telling the Judge that the longer he waits to allow “we the people” to seek justice in court the more damage that Obama does to our Country. The Justice Department is basically defending a Usuper in office.. the entire system appears to be corrupt.. of course, Eric Holder is simply a puppet for Obama.
We hope and pray that Judge Carter allows this case to be transferred.. Obama will have a much tougher time getting the case dismissed in Washington DC if Carter allows the transfer.. Any kind of ruling against Obama will set a precedent that could literally force the Court into action.
I need to thank you for starting all your posts with “YOU WERE SAYING” followed by the quote in blue type. This way, I can skip your inane posts. Really helpful, especially on long threads.
Don't worry, Hemenway (like Leo & Steven) will get the same treatment from the Orly haters???
Their squawking, bleating, and squealing is reminiscent of semi-wild animals on a dirt road in a third world country.
No manners or original thoughts, just mindless noise, while wallowing in their own poop, and content to be rounded up and told what to do before they’re led to slaughter by their overlords.
The Silence of the Lambs came to my mind.
Oh, I’ve noticed the *sharks* and try to avoid them. Thanks for the warning.
That is not surprising for a lot of us. But I'm glad that you finally have figured out that you ARE a nut!
And no, I'm not one of "those," I am one of MANY!!
BTW, let alone, there were not neither Republicans nor Democrats, there was a third "President" candidate that was not a NBC either, less an American citizen!!!
LOL! You’ve noticed that, too? It does make it easy to spot.
Well said, bless you LucyT
Star traveler is a well known PITA on these threads....don't forget the LOL's, lol
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2300731/posts?page=135#135
?????????????????????????????????????????????????
Me no know?
I agree, that blue italics (I think the blue is also in italics) makes it so much easier to skip over the logorrhea.
ping
So if the SC doesn't do their job, then are they defrauding the government by accepting compensation and refusing to do their job? So we impeach tenm, right, just liek we fire a cop who won't arrest his relative for commiting a crime. Take the oath, do the job or resign, no middle ground. 1 1/2 million people marched on DC, we need and deserve an answer as to what is a NBC and is Obama one? The question is not going away whether the SC would like it to or not. If the SC doesn't do their job, why should I continue to pay taxes and obey laws?
Logorrhea. a new word for me. ;-)
Longorrhea in a sentence. She suffer from logorrhea of the mouth.
Na, that can't be it.
Who says the Supreme Court didn't do their job? They visited the citizenship issue more than a century ago with Kim Wong Ark. Just because a group of people want them to revisit the issue (and construct a ruling that would disqualify Obama) doesn't mean SCOTUS is obligated to do so.
Bookmark.
He may have been born in Hawaii, but the alone does not make him a Natural Born Citizen. A natural born citizen is a child of citizens, plural. Although in the old days that would have probably been stated as the child of a citizen father, which he is not, by his own words. This is because in those days a woman's citizenship was that of her husband, so that way of speaking still fit the old definition of NBC, as a person born in a country of parents who are its citizens at the time of birth.
Although since he refuses to say which hospital in Hawaii he was born in, even Hawaiian birht is somewhat questionable, regardless of what his Birth Certificate might say. (IOW, it might say he wasn't born in a hospital, which would be unlikely for the time and his mother and grandparents socioeconomic status.)
But the legislature could, if they wished, direct that copies of the long form, or their electronic equivalent, be issued to the state election commission, or whomever, perhaps the Secretary of State, at the request of anyone running for office, for which there is a citizenship requirement, Where there is a residency requirement, the candidate should have to produce a list of residences, with dates of residence, to show compliance.
IOW, that was a CYA BS excuse, to allow them to do what they really wanted to do in the first place, that is not require a full and complete birth certificate, that would allow for some independent verification of the information thereon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.