Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oliver Stone Suggests Hitler Is 'Easy Scapegoat' ["We Can't Judge People As Only 'Bad' or 'Good']
Telegraph(UK) ^ | Nick Allen

Posted on 01/10/2010 5:06:27 PM PST by Steelfish

Oliver Stone Suggests Hitler Is 'Easy Scapegoat' Oliver Stone, the controversial film director, is facing another backlash after suggesting that Hitler was made an "easy scapegoat" by history.

By Nick Allen in Los Angeles 10 Jan 2010

Stone, who has previously been accused of promoting conspiracy theories and glorifying violence in his films, has made a new documentary series which he says will place historical figures including Hitler and Stalin "in context". In the trailer for "The Secret History of America" the director says: "You cannot approach history unless you have empathy for the person you may hate."

He told a press conference at the Television Critics Association in California that "we can't judge people as only 'bad' or 'good'". "Hitler is an easy scapegoat throughout history and it's been used cheaply. He's the product of a series of actions. It's cause and effect," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: hitler; hollyweird; libtard; moonbats; oliverstone; oliverstoned; secrethistory; sympathizers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: matt1234

It sounds like the Kerry Purple Heart in Vietnam story. I don’t think it was a real real Purple Heart the way we think they should be given out.


21 posted on 01/10/2010 5:33:40 PM PST by ColdOne (ColdOne(Why can't Michelle practice law anymore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
It sounds like the Kerry Purple Heart in Vietnam story.

It does, but I know it was not a recycling of the Kerry story because it was told to me c. 1990.

22 posted on 01/10/2010 5:37:41 PM PST by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
That included a "complete other story" about how Stalin had fought against the German war machine more than anyone.

Hmmm, How does he explain Stalin being Hitler's ally and helping him hide the building of the German war machine from the rest of Europe?

23 posted on 01/10/2010 5:44:23 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I can judge Oliver Stone as crazy as a loon.


24 posted on 01/10/2010 5:49:16 PM PST by Baladas ((ABBHO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

If Stone has anything to do with it, there will be very little value to this history.


25 posted on 01/10/2010 5:54:50 PM PST by popdonnelly (Yes, we disagree - no, we won't shut up - no, we won't quit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whershey

> In your opinion, what were his redeeming values and how are you defining redeeming?

“Redeeming” in this case would mean any traits that weren’t inherently evil.

IMO, Hitler had these “redeeming” traits:

1) he was an impressive public speaker
2) he was visionary
3) he could inspire followers to buy into his vision
4) he could assemble a capable team of acolytes to implement his vision
5) he was an astute politician, using the frailties of the human condition to his best advantage

The middle three traits are important leadership skills. When added to the last trait they describe nearly any successful politician ever. When added to the first skill, they describe every “great” politician ever.

(I use “great” in the Lord Acton sense of the word: “great men are almost always bad men.”)


26 posted on 01/10/2010 5:57:58 PM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Did Pat Buchanan write the screen play?


27 posted on 01/10/2010 6:00:51 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (:: The government will do for health care what it did for real estate. ::)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

This is the end of Oliver Stone—To say anything good about Hitler is to end your career. Good riddance.


28 posted on 01/10/2010 6:03:50 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Thank you for the info.


29 posted on 01/10/2010 6:12:40 PM PST by ColdOne (ColdOne(Why can't Michelle practice law anymore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

Yes, you can always qualify some actions as being “good” that even evil people do, but their worldview is still evil, and, the action—though on the outside it may appear to be good—can not be because of the encompassing evil soul of the person doing the action.

I do not think any of Hitler’s actions (although appearing good—like kindness to animals) could be classified as anything but being entirely motivated by selfishness and sickness. He was an extremely sick, perverted person judging by the books I have read about him. His soul was very twisted and he was a man of extreme anger.

I do think it is God’s place to judge the soul and Stone should not pretend that someone who did such atrocities could do anything classified as good. Such evil only elicits deeds that are done for evil or twisted purposes—even if they look good to outside observers.


30 posted on 01/10/2010 6:39:22 PM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
the director says: "You cannot approach history unless you have empathy for the person you may hate."

If feelings are more important than facts that is true. Most people think Hitler's actions were a more important barometer of his character than a Freudian psychological profile of his personality. I don't have to have empathy or hatred for Hitler to understand that he was a psychopath.

31 posted on 01/10/2010 6:44:43 PM PST by TigersEye (Tar & feathers! Pitchforks and torches! ... Get some while supplies last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

What you call “redeeming” traits, can not be called redeeming in the way that Hitler used them. He lacked character and goodness, so all his actions led to destruction and death—his speeches, his visions, his devoted followers, his political machinations. Things done for evil purposes can ultimately never be redeeming.


32 posted on 01/10/2010 7:00:07 PM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MGMSwordsman
Had the Germans won World War 2, Hitler’s legacy would have been far different.

If Hitler had won the war, he would have proceeded to kill or enslave all the Slavs, including the Russians. That would have been his legacy.

33 posted on 01/10/2010 7:00:32 PM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

What you call “redeeming” traits, can not be called redeeming in the way that Hitler used them. He lacked character and goodness, so all his actions led to destruction and death—his speeches, his visions, his devoted followers, his political machinations. Things done for evil purposes can ultimately never be redeeming.


34 posted on 01/10/2010 7:01:42 PM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

that crossed my mind as well.


35 posted on 01/10/2010 7:38:34 PM PST by berdie (Hey, Bill Mahr...That's Mrs. Cracker to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

‘little value to history’

i completely agree. but i can’t help but wonder how many young people will lap his drivel up like a kitten laps milk,,they have no knowledge of history. hitler will end up being a misunderstood , tragic figure..sort of like the present day terrorists are portrayed. the young will jump on board.

sorry for the lousy formatting, my cap lock is not feeling well.


36 posted on 01/10/2010 7:45:22 PM PST by berdie (Hey, Bill Mahr...That's Mrs. Cracker to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

> What you call “redeeming” traits, can not be called redeeming in the way that Hitler used them.

Agreed. He used his talents to the furtherance of Evil.

So can anyone.

It is a mistake for us to paint Hitler as absolutely evil, as if we should be able to identify him as Evil on first sight. To do so is a gross over-simplification. Evil people do not come ready-equipped with horns and a pointy tail. And good people can be tricked into supporting Evil people as a result.

Hitler was charismatic. He had natural charm, and he is reported to have had a soft spot for children and animals. He could be very convincing.

He was definitely a complex character.

None of what I have just said subtracts from the fact that Hitler was an evil man — thoroughly evil. And none of it should be taken as an endorsement or as support of Hitler as a person.

He’s just considerably more complicated than simply “Evil”.

The same sorts of people who voted for Hitler would have been just as likely to vote for...?

(I’m not going to say it, you can fill in the blanks for yourself.)

*That* is the real danger of over-simplifying Evil: we cannot spot the real thing when it presents itself if we expect it to be obviously Evil.


37 posted on 01/10/2010 8:13:29 PM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

> My great uncle who was in Patton’s 3rd Army and helped liberate Buchenwald would have a different view than yours

Possibly he would. That doesn’t invalidate my view, however.

Evil people, like Hitler, do not come pre-equipped with horns and a pointy tail. If they did, they would be easier to spot and they would fool fewer people.

Hitler had enough going for him to inspire otherwise-intelligent, otherwise-good people to fight and ultimately die for his Vision.

Therein lies the danger of oversimplification: Hitler was far more complex than simply “thoroughly Evil and with no redeeming qualities”. Of course he was!

He fooled an entire Nation.


38 posted on 01/10/2010 8:27:44 PM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter
It is a mistake for us to paint Hitler as absolutely evil, as if we should be able to identify him as Evil on first sight. ... Evil people do not come ready-equipped with horns and a pointy tail.

*That* is the real danger of over-simplifying Evil: we cannot spot the real thing when it presents itself if we expect it to be obviously Evil.

When you decide which one of these diametrically opposed premises is the true one let us know. lol

39 posted on 01/10/2010 8:42:39 PM PST by TigersEye (Tar & feathers! Pitchforks and torches! ... Get some while supplies last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“Stone? Goebbels, you keep that nutjob away from my life story! That ****ing cokehead hasn’t directed anything worth **** since Wall Street!”

40 posted on 01/10/2010 8:46:26 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson