Your attention is needed, read from 290 on, more if you want. The pure intent of this thread has been severely undermined
>>Your attention is needed, read from 290<<
290 on??? This is Post 437!! I tried, but it is like coming into the theater in the middle of a Fellini film (maybe that’s a bad analogy — how would you know?).
But I did get some interesting info: P-Marlowe, you’re a chick? All these years and I thought you were posting from a masculine perspective. Next time, I will take my hat off and offer you a chair, I promise.
There.
Haven’t read this thread for a couple of days and CAN NOT believe how far from the original intent it has strayed!
I thought the idea of selecting and electing conservatives was an important issue. As Rush says, “Conservatism works every time it’s tried.”
I didn’t read each and every post because frankly I couldn’t understand how the twisted remarks I did read applied to the thread. They were not thought provoking and bordered on hateful, IMHO.
MM...I am so sorry you’ve had to defend yourself and others that contributed so much and care so much about our country. I like the expression *lead, follow or get out of the way*. Lead on.