Posted on 01/08/2010 4:32:46 AM PST by truthandlife
The US does not want to see confrontation with Iran but is still preparing its military for that possibility, America's top uniformed officer said Thursday.
"We've looked to do all we can to ensure that conflict doesn't break out there, while at the same time preparing forces, as we do for many contingencies that we understand might occur," Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said during an appearance at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
Mullen had been asked whether the US military was stretched too thin to take further action in trouble spots beyond Iraq and Afghanistan.
"We're very hard-pressed right now" because of the two wars, he noted, but added that it is primarily ground troops that have been deployed, and "the likelihood that our ground forces would have to go somewhere in these kinds of numbers in some other part of the world, or even in the same region, I think is pretty low."
Many experts assess that any American military engagement with Iran would most likely rely on air and naval power.
Mullen was even more definitive when asked to assess whether Teheran was seeking to acquire nuclear weapons.
"I believe that they're on a path that has a strategic intent to develop nuclear weapons and have been for some time," he said.
Mullen's words were echoed by a report in The New York Times this week that US President Barack Obama's top advisers say "they no longer believe the much disputed National Intelligence Estimate" from 2007, which assessed that Iranian scientists ended all work on designing a nuclear warhead in 2003.
Israel had long objected to that finding, and questioned the intelligence evaluation behind it. Mullen's comments and those of other US officials bring the two countries more in line.
"I think the Obama administration now fully acknowledges that Iran intends to conduct a nuclear weapons capability program," Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren told The Jerusalem Post Wednesday. "We agree with the administration on the intent of the Iranian regime to acquire nuclear military capability."
The Times also reported that technical challenges and potential Western sabotage have significantly hurt Iran's production of low enriched uranium, a necessary component for a nuclear bomb. That has set back the American estimated timeline for production of a weapon, according to the Times.
Oren indicated that Israel remains focused on the low enriched uranium still being produced.
"In spite of some reported breakdown in centrifuges, Iran still has something in the vicinity of 4,000 centrifuges that are operating and they are churning out significant quantities of LEU," he said.
Mullen called any attainment of a nuclear weapon by Iran "incredibly destabilizing," particularly because it could set off an arms race in the region and because of Teheran's support for terrorism.
"On the other hand," he added, "striking Iran, that also has a very, very destabilizing outcome. What I worry about in most of the cases are the unintended consequences."
He said that to prevent such scenarios, the US needed "to continue to aggressively address the nuclear weapons issue," to stress international discussions of additional sanctions and to continue "where possible to engage and have a dialogue."
Jim Hoagland, who has written extensively about foreign policy for The Washington Post and participated in Thursday's event, described Mullen's remarks on Iran as vague.
"That does reflect a lack of a clear policy within the administration about what to do on Iran," he said.
I know this should not be a determination but the Dems always make everything political.
Actually I think the Emperor may have left a few golf balls in his pockets as it appears he has grown some very recently, I suspect there will be a very covert operation under way very very soon, and TOTUS is sparking with anticipation of announcing success.
While I believe that those charged with our defense are doing ALL that they can... I also believe that iran will not suffer even a pin prick under the kenyan marxist muzzie.
LLS
I bet it hurt like hell for the Narcissist-in-Chief to read on the teleprompter yesterday that the blame lies with him for the failed terrorist attack on Christmas. However, had it been a successful attack, Bush probably would have been blamed.
Maybe the Israelis would have to fight Iran alone.
the Iranian people told 0bama: you’re with us or you’re with the terrorists
“The pussy-in-chief is not going to authorize the use of force no matter what they do.”
He’ll send forth a batch of lawyers!
*ping* - Jerusalem Post

Yup.... Just what we need. Another mucked up covert operation from an inept moron like the one in 1980.
You think the Emperor would send out an ill fated mission for other motives?
Hussein might do a camel strike in the butt (ala Clinton), but he isn't going to do anything lasting for freedom's cause.
Hussein cares more about enslaving Americans than he does freeing anyone from an oppressive government.
Well, DUH! The community organizer has just figured that out?????
OMG. He's suppose to be the president????
I don't think Oboma is that smart. The same people who told us Hillary was the smartest woman in the world are the same ones telling us Oboma is "Reel Smert." I haven't seen any evidence of it yet.
He's evil, yes, but smart? Not really.
BUSH WAS RIGHT!
and bomb Iran
If zero’s following the FDR plan like I think he is, as he continues his bowing and scraping, Neville Chamberlain style, he’s eventually going draw us into his WWII with the continuing botched Iranian-Yemeni-NKorean screwups.
Army, Marines stretched? Yeah. But the Navy and Air Force is barely utilized right now. B-1's, B-52's and throw in 3 or 4 carriers and Iran is in a world of hurt. Americans have been thirsting for justice in Iran, since 1979.
If he thinks he can further demoralize his enemies (the citizens of the United States) by launching such an attack then I most definitely do believe he will. As an illegal commander in chief this jerk has commandeered America's command post (the White House) with little or NO resistance and now he's using that post to kill America. Plain and simple.
Unless we wipe out the mullahs and top Iranian leaders, any military action taken now is just delaying an even larger conflict in the future that will involve ground troops, plus it will have the effect of galvanizing the Iranian people behind the mullahs.
Amen!
LLS
Not going to happen. 0bama will not make war against an ally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.