Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Comments?
1 posted on 01/07/2010 6:42:20 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Responsibility2nd
Most of the items on that list can be achieved by simply requiring that our federal government stay within the confines of the powers specifically granted it in the original Constitution.

I'd settle for repeal of the 16th and 17th Amendments.

And as much as it'd be nice to have them, we can live without the line-item veto and congressional term limits if We the People are willing to use the ballot box to keep congress in check.

24 posted on 01/07/2010 7:04:02 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Most of them are short sighted. Others are silly. The rest are the way things really already are but we as a nation have screwed up the reading.


32 posted on 01/07/2010 7:07:26 AM PST by discostu (The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Too many items that are statutory rather than constitutional in nature, and some that’re just bad ideas: “Allow for the presence of “God” in the public domain.” Who dat? Moloch?


33 posted on 01/07/2010 7:08:40 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

TERRIBLE idea.

Marxists would use such a convention to end Americas Constitutional freedoms.

A dangerous and foolish idea to even toy with.


35 posted on 01/07/2010 7:10:51 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (2012: Repeal it all... All of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
And...

to remove ANY confusion (WE Conservatives are not confused by our 2nd Amendment, but left-wing un-American progressives and liberals are, be they democrat, independent, or RINO) about just what the 2nd Amendment REALLY means...

modify the 2A to simply say...

The right of the people to keep and bear arms, ammunition, and related items shall not be infringed in any way whatsoever.

37 posted on 01/07/2010 7:14:20 AM PST by DocH (Official Right-Wing Extremist Veteran Seal Of Approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

problem is that once you open a constitutional convention, the whole document is open, and you cannot control what the special interests can do.

goodbye second ammendment, for example.


38 posted on 01/07/2010 7:14:23 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Urging the current Congress and Senate to convene a Constitutional convention is a profoundly lousy idea.

SnakeDoc


39 posted on 01/07/2010 7:15:48 AM PST by SnakeDoctor (Ask not for a lighter burden, but for broader shoulders ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
Pardon me for yelling but...

NO CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION IS REQUIRED.

We have a perfectly good Constitution already.

What we need is a NEW CONGRESS and POTUS.

Thanks for your indulgence.

40 posted on 01/07/2010 7:17:42 AM PST by paulycy (AMERICA: Less safe. Less free. More broke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
They forgot the largest one.

Severely limit the ability of congress to create or raise taxes without a supermajority (say 3/4) except in time of war.

I would also propose the following to eliminate unfunded mandates:

"The federal government of the United States, being a creature of the states and the people, may not require the expenditure of funds for any purpose except that it provide all necessary funds. All prior unfunded spending requirements are null and void except that the federal government provide the funds for expenditure."

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

42 posted on 01/07/2010 7:21:13 AM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

NO!


43 posted on 01/07/2010 7:21:29 AM PST by afnamvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Term limits should also apply to all members of of the federal judiciary including the supreme court to terms of 12 years or less. Life time appointments make no sense in today’s longer living population.


45 posted on 01/07/2010 7:23:15 AM PST by 2pages (Judges too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

This is non specific. Constitutional mandates need to be very precisely worded to prevent abuse. Even with that, they still abuse them. The second amendment is a perfect example of weasels twisting words to mean other than what they say.

The U.S. constitution needs two amendments.
First, “No government entity may regulate commerce between the states. If an act violates the laws of one state, but not the state where the act originated, the state where the violation occurred may extradite and pursue legal remedy for such act.”

No more federal alphabet soup.

Second, “Rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court may be reversed or vacated by an act of the legislative and executive branches. If the act is not passed by a 2/3 majority in both houses, and signed by the president within thirty days of the announcement of the ruling, then the Court’s ruling shall stand. The thrity days shall begin on the first day the legislature convenes if it is not in session when the Court’s decision is read.”

The Supreme Court was never intended to have godlike authority.

If I could have a fantasy third amendment, then legislative districts would have no more than 100,000 people. Each state gets six senators and one is elected each year. This reduces the power of each individual legislator. It also makes them accessible. Representatives have a legitimate complaint that campaigning and fund raising consume much of their time. Constituents have a legitimate complaint that they have no access to their representative. Less time and money are needed to reach the voters in a smaller district. Smaller districts also reduce the opportunity for gerrymandering. A smaller district makes it more difficult to pack the district to ensure re-election of the incumbent. It also means the legislator faces competition from people who will go to the schools and supermarkets and personally know the people, not the lobbyists, who want his vote.

Further, it also means that Congress will get less done, as it will take more effort to ensure a successful vote. I think we will all be better off if Congress does less, but they’ll never surrender their power.


47 posted on 01/07/2010 7:27:17 AM PST by sig226 (Bring back Jimmy Carter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
No, we MUST simply find a way to FORCE the government back to the original constraints built in by the founding fathers.

There seems to be no mechanism to do this (other than exorcising our 2nd Amendment rights) otherwise one of the 100 quadrillion scum sucking lawyers we have in this country would have tripped over it and sued.

48 posted on 01/07/2010 7:31:21 AM PST by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Nothing but a Trojan Horse. Here we want to make the Constitution better lets have a convention. When the convention is under way they can nullify the current Constitution, then where will we be?????


50 posted on 01/07/2010 7:44:42 AM PST by pietraynor (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd
10 is alot, hob 'bout we start with 1:

Congress shall follow the Constitution as written. For interpretation see: Federalist Papers.

51 posted on 01/07/2010 7:49:56 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

OK, but since Congress, the courts, and all federal, State, and local government agencies including law enforcement have completely ignored the current Constitution, what’s there to say they will follow anything new in it?

The corruption is too far gone, the bribery a matter of routine “campaign contributions”, and, frankly, they really don’t give a sh*t what you think of their ignoring the Constitution. Hell, they are writing bribery right into the health care bill! In your face! Blatantly! What are you going to do about that?!


53 posted on 01/07/2010 7:57:16 AM PST by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

No matter how justified a reason is for a convention, care must be taken not to open pandoras’ box. A constitutional convention has an unlimited agenda...the whole thing is open to all comers, and the World has its liberals and totalitarians to funnel supranational agendas into the process to compete with the original intended purpose.


55 posted on 01/07/2010 8:03:34 AM PST by givemELL (Does Taiwan Meet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Yes. This is a terrible idea.

The ConCon will be the end of the Republic as we know it. The left will seize control of it and, regardless of why it is conveined, will use it to overthrown our republic and eviscerate our Bill of Rights. Starting with the hated second ammendment.

Travis McGee’s excellent novel series: “Enemies Foreign and Domestic” is very specific about how this could be done.

A far better plan is to
1) Elect a conservative GOP Senate in 2010 and 2012
2) Elect a real conservative to replace Zero in 2012
3) Appoint more conservatives to the SC and
4) in time toss FDR’s unconstitutional Socialist reforms (including SSI).

And, of course, using the other mechanism to ammend the Constitution is great. That mechanism does not lend itself to mischeif making like the ConCon does.

The ConCon is the Alinkyite dream!!


56 posted on 01/07/2010 8:17:00 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

Here is the background of the individual mentioned in the article. He is either a knowing Soros shill, a useful idiot, or just incredibly misguided. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and say the latter.

William H. Fruth

William H. Fruth is the President of POLICOM Corporation, an independent economics research firm located in Palm City, Florida, which specializes in studying the dynamics of local economies.

He has personally evaluated the data for more than 600 local economies in the United States, created more than 150 economic and community studies, and, since 1998, has provided presentations and workshops for state-national associations and community forums in 33 states.

Through his analysis, he determines if an economy is growing or declining, what is causing this to happen, and offers solutions to improve or maintain the situation.

He is a nationally recognized leader in the field of geographic economics and also has extensive experience in economic development.

From 1988 to 1995, Fruth served as Vice President of a major industrial land development company directing the development and marketing of a 500-acre corporate park in the West Palm Beach, Florida area.

Prior to that, he was President of the Business Development Board of Palm Beach County, the economic development organization for the area. During that tenure was named Florida’s Economic Development Professional of the Year in 1987.

From 1980 to 1984, Bill served in a full time capacity as Mayor of Tiffin, Ohio. During this time, he was named one of the “Five Outstanding Young Men in Ohio” and was heavily involved in economic and community development locally and statewide.

Fruth has been recognized by the Florida Administrative Court as an expert witness regarding local economies and is a member of the American Institute for Economic Research and the American Economic Association.

Additionally, he is member of the International Economic Development Council, Florida Economic Development Council, and the Southern Economic Development Council.

Fruth received the Bachelor of Science and Master of Arts degrees from Bowling Green State University in Ohio studying political theory, communications, and journalism.

A video of a sample presentation is available upon request.


59 posted on 01/07/2010 8:34:34 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

a)Clearly define the meaning of socialism. Especially with respect to the government takeover of private businesses and banks.

b)Make sure we the people are not prevented from reviewing all bills being voted on by Congress. The legislative process must be transparent.

c)All bills must be read thoroughly before a legislator can vote on it.

d)Congress must govern according to the will of the people.The only except would be n the case of a national emergency such as war or natural or man-made disaster.

These are suggestions and should be worded appropriately and clearly.


62 posted on 01/07/2010 9:08:25 AM PST by orinoco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson