Skip to comments.
Romney will decide on 2012 run after midterms (Profile in Courage /sarc)
The Hill ^
| 1/5/2010
| Michael O'Brien
Posted on 01/05/2010 11:23:23 AM PST by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Mitt: kiss my ass.
To: markomalley
Let me help you, Mr. Romney. FORGET IT!!!!!!!!!!
2
posted on
01/05/2010 11:25:02 AM PST
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: markomalley
MITT save us all the energy to DEFEAT YOUR LEFTIST BUTT..
SAY NO ... NOW!!!
3
posted on
01/05/2010 11:25:08 AM PST
by
gwilhelm56
(Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his office. ")
To: markomalley
One leftist complaining about the purity of leftism of another leftist. Pretty amusing.
4
posted on
01/05/2010 11:25:27 AM PST
by
Seruzawa
(If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
To: markomalley
Perhaps Willard will top his spending per vote in 2012. ;)
5
posted on
01/05/2010 11:26:11 AM PST
by
C19fan
To: gwilhelm56
Romney wont quit. Even if you beat him with a baseball bat, he’s so far off the range he thinks he can win over Obeyme in a landslide.
To: markomalley
Romney, why not wait to see how that book tour of yours goes. If less than 10 people show up and 5 of them are your boys, you may want to rethink running for President.
7
posted on
01/05/2010 11:27:27 AM PST
by
VicVega
(2010 Let only Real Conservatives win. Say good night John McCain.)
To: markomalley
F**k you, Mitt.
8
posted on
01/05/2010 11:28:00 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: markomalley
Not again...please not again. Isn’t there some business deal somewhere just waiting for him?
GO AWAY!!!!
9
posted on
01/05/2010 11:30:06 AM PST
by
azishot
To: markomalley
Just say no to RomneyCare
10
posted on
01/05/2010 11:30:54 AM PST
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: max americana
**hes so far off the range he thinks he can win over Obeyme in a landslide.**
Only problem with that statement.. after four years of FUHRER OBAMA... IF there IS an election.. a Trained CHIMPANZEE will be able to beat Der FUHRER!
and MITT is BARKY LITE.. he did to MA healthcare what BARKY wants to do to the rest of us..
He will NOT be getting my vote .. even if he is the nominee.
11
posted on
01/05/2010 11:31:49 AM PST
by
gwilhelm56
(Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his office. ")
To: markomalley
...concentrate on the task ahead, for me that's trying to get some good people elected in 2010. So Willard is going to help Republicans get elected in 2010. What a jerk.
12
posted on
01/05/2010 11:32:20 AM PST
by
Plutarch
To: markomalley
To: markomalley
And it seems to me,
You live your life,
Like a finger in the wind.
Never knowin’ where to turn to,
When the votes come in.................
14
posted on
01/05/2010 11:33:24 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Obama - The first ever elected lame duck..............)
To: Plutarch
Your 15 minutes are up Mittster.
To: markomalley
"I knew he was a smart individual I thought that he would learn that governing from the middle was the right way to go, as president Clinton learned his second term, but he's made a lot of the mistakes that ideologues often do, which is thinking that everybody in the country voted for their extreme agenda." This statement tells you everything you need to know about Romney.
To: markomalley
Just say no to all RINO’s!
To: markomalley
Romney has stumped for plenty of GOP candidates since dropping his 2008 presidential bid
.. Romney backstabbed plenty of GOP candidates.
Late in October, The American Spectator's The Prowler revealed:
"Former Mitt Romney presidential campaign staffers
have been involved in spreading anti-Palin spin to reporters, seeking to diminish her standing after the election.
'Sarah Palin is a lightweight, she won't be the first, not even the third, person people will think of when it comes to 2012,'
says one former Romney aide
'The only serious candidate ready to challenge to lead the Republican Party is Mitt Romney.
"Some former Romney aides were behind the recent leaks to media, including CNN, that Governor Sarah Palin was a 'diva' and was going off message intentionally."
The Palmetto Scoop reported: "One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was
the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"Im told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palins people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romneys former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw
that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.
Erick Erickson, who organized Operation Leper, said:
"These staffers are now out trying to finish her off
.hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."
"Who's the Palin Leaker from the McCain Campaign?
National Review Online The publication of a Vanity Fair profile of Sarah Palin
appears to have opened old wounds in the McCain campaign.
... the source of the Diva leak was Nicolle Wallaces husband."
Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
Poor sport spoiler Romney attacks other GOP candidates:
Novak: "Fred Thompson drop-out rumors traced to Romney campaign"
Said Novak: "The rumors were traced in part to Mitt Romney's campaign,
trying to stir up strife between McCain and Thompson."
"Despite outspending his rivals by huge margins throughout the primaries,
(Mitt Romney, Carpetbagger UT,CA,MA,NH,Mexico) lost Iowa, South Carolina, Florida and California.
The only primaries he won were in Michigan, where Dad was governor; LDS states;
and a few states on Super Tuesday in which his California-obsessed rivals
couldn't spare the cash to advertise.
Only John Connolly in 1968 had a worse cash-to-delegates ratio.
And John McCain rightly did not like Romney's tactics during the primaries.
(W)hen (Romney's early leads) started slipping away, he resorted to unfair,
distorted, scorched-earth negative ads, betting that his opponents couldn't
afford to spend enough for the truth to catch up to his charges."
[Romney: A Mistake for McCain, 7/23/2008, Dick Morris]
18
posted on
01/05/2010 11:35:12 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: markomalley
Mitt only
thinks he's "conservative" because he keeps comparing himself to Harry Reid!
Just like when he told Chris Wallace in Aug '07 that he NEVER considered himself as "pro-choice"....which means he must have thought...
...attending Planned Parenthood fundraising parties (as he did in the early 1990s)
...sending checks to Planned Parenthood (as his wife did in the early 1990s)
...trying to "out-abortion" opposing candidate Teddy Kennedy in his rhetoric ('92)
...soliciting pro-abortion voters guide distributors (as he did 2002)
...being in favor of embryonic stem cell research (as he was in 2004 and returned in Dec 2007 in his infamous Katie Couric interview)
...and passing pro-abortion healthcare in the Bay State...
...well, apparently all this was "pro-life" Mitt activity!
(No wonder some call him the Mythster!)
19
posted on
01/05/2010 11:35:23 AM PST
by
Colofornian
(If you're not going to drink the coffee, at least wake up and smell it!)
To: markomalley
Instant Romneytown. Just add koolaid.
20
posted on
01/05/2010 11:35:58 AM PST
by
Psalm 144
(What did you think NEW WORLD ORDER meant? The Constitution? States' rights? Individual liberty?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson