Posted on 01/03/2010 6:54:35 PM PST by Man50D
On Jan 4th, 2010 at 9am I have thousands of patriots that are demanding Beck answer why this matter is being banned from his show and Fox news entirely.
This is called Operation “FLOOD IT”
We will all call (888) 727-2325 and demand to know:
Why there are pending lawsuits in the courts and Fox news is not talking about them?
Why have the lawyers and plaintiffs never appeared ONCE on Fox News?
Why is Fox News protecting Obama with this issue?
Why did Fox News hide this story PRIOR to the 2008 election?
Why are the Fox viewers not being kept up to date on the pending lawsuits and questions regarding Obama’s ineligibility?
Why is the name Barry Soetoro never mentioned on Beck’s show?
Is it Murdoch or the Saudi Prince that banned this topic from Fox news?
Did they threaten all Fox news personalities that this issue is not to be mentioned on Fox news and OFF as well? This explains why the blackout has reached Hannity and Becks radio show.
What is everyone in a panic for? They all claim Obama is eligible, then this really is an open and shut case…right? or is it?
This is the issue that can throw Obama aka Barry Soetoro into jail. This is the issue that could implode the Democrat party, because many powerful people are possibly also involved in this massive cover up. Many Americans that voted for Obama, would feel betrayed and they will walk away from the Democrat party FOREVER.
This is the issue that could bring down the 1st African-American president and the left are protecting him with everything they got. Obama has betrayed the African American people, because he has allowed this black cloud to ruin a historic moment.
This is the issue that is most important and dangerous, that is the real reason why it is banned from the American MSM.
So, I am asking all of you to join us on Jan 4th, 2010 at 9am EST to call Glenn Beck and demand answers. This is not a Democrat or Republican issue, this is a U.S. Constitution issue. The number is (888) 727-2325…
If you don't understand the concept of "legally ripe," then don't post idiocy such as generated by this wacko "Citizens Grand Jury" group.
If you don't understand the elements of broadcast program topic selection, as this Citizens Grand Jury wackos so obviously don't, then don't start making accusations about how FOXNews people have been threatened.
These people are way out of their league... and out of their monthly supply of Thorazine as well.
IMHO, that is what everybody here is doing...
It's just that, like a seven year old in Baskin & Robbins, there are so many "anti" or "un" Constitutional actions being perpetrated on the serfs by our rulers that it is impossible to give significant effort (or, even, attention) to all of them at the same time.
Therefore, we seem to have a situation not uncommon amongst large groups of generally like-minded people...Individuals, as defined under Conservative principles, are likely to agree on the broader issue of trying to reverse the Marxist coup that has occurred....But there can be many, many bona fide tactics, not all, necessarily, with equal potential to attain victory.
Therefore, again IMHO, it would seem to be best to continue this "war on Marxism" on as many fronts as possible. For instance, you stay on course with the pursuit of this commie skunk based on his undoubted ineligibilty...I'll continue compiling the coordinates of all potentially fat opportunities that might present when the endgame arrives.
There was no personal attack and I will not engage in some bullcrap argument with you. That is all.
I agree that the media has been negligent on covering this topic. Most sane people have seen that they covered the Michael Jackson court cases better than a case against a sitting president. Things that make you say hmmmm.
Don’t let the government propagandists get to you....there are some that love to attack and prevent discussion of this topic, even on FR.
Man50D, you seem to have a lot of information and command of the facts as you seem them, have you tried calling Glenn’s radio show?
Uh, so far I haven’t seen any people that can do something about it.
It’s unlikely any legit news source will raise the issue without any ironclad proof - and that’s unlikely to happen.
But if you want to have some fun, find a sugar daddy or raise from individual donations some substantial fund (a million dollars would be nice; $100,000 would do just fine), and offer it to anyone who can identify the physician or midwife who delivered little BO, and who can provide proof for their claim.
And at every chance, point out not only are there no takers, but that the Obama camp has spent over a million bucks to make sure no one can get at the document that would allow that challenge to be addressed.
Exactly right. Just like THIS Law
It can be passed NOW.
They can do THIS right now.
Would that help conservatives get elected in 2010?
Would it help stop the Health Care Reform legislation?
Or the Cap and Trade bill?
Do you think the Justice Department would suddenly stop criminalizing the entire Republican agenda?
The damage being done, as we speak, is not being done by the guy who is signing the bills into law...it's the Congress who is writing the laws...you know...THE SINGLE-PARTY CONGRESS!!!!!
Of all the things that this country is facing, this has to be the most bizarre pursuit for the minority party to be engaged in.
I thought it was quite odd for them.
I am thinking about Murdoch’s Arab
financial connections and just wondering ......
Mario Appuzo is measured and probably much more expert now than he was a year ago in the constitutional history of the definition of natural born citizen. It should be easy to find an academic, or perhaps see if Holder or Anita Dunn's husband, or even Larry Tribe could take the anti-Jay, Anti-John Marshall, anti-Waite, anti-Bingham, anti-Washington, anti-Hamilton, anti-Madison position.
Whoever dares to ask if Obama satisfies “...born in the country of parents who are its citizens” is sure to get the full Alinsky treatment. Beck quotes “...and the truth shall set you free” but, for whatever reason, is afraid to touch that truth. Whoever does will get great ratings, and the left wing drones will call him or her every name they can think of - but they won't answer the question clearly, and that proves the point.
No pundit on the “right” has the integrity and courage to ask how a man whose father was, by his own description, a subject of the British Commonwealth, making his son a subject by the British Nationality laws can be said to satisfy the unchanged definition “...born in the country of parents who are its citizens?”
A proof of foreign birth would nail ineligibility, but the powers, and trillions of dollars at stake insure that we will never find documents. Obama’s security chief before the election was CIA. Men have already died for having the knowledge of what was in State Department files. Proving violation of jus soli is a long shot (though he should have assured us that he satisfied it). But his parents, both of them, were not citizens. That is not a long shot, but a certainty. The more you read about the origins and understanding of jus sanguinis by our founders, the more you will realize that the doubts about it have been planted lately by Obama operatives. It can only be changed by constitutional amendment. The senate pretended to change it in 2008.
Keep questioning. Pay no attention to name calling. Obama is a wonderful example of why our founders required both jus soli and jus sanguinis for our president.
I wish you luck. I’ll set my alarm to listen !!!!
I was just listening to the radio and Billy Cunniningham is on and said something is fixing to go down on the Birth Certificate. He said he talked to Sean Hannity 4 days ago about it and said he wasn’t gonna say what they talked about in private but did tell his guest who was talking about the BC by stating if they really start asking hard relentless Birth Certificate questions to the media enough that the cards will fall. Cunningham did say that if Obama is found to be not eligible that the Healthcare would be defeated at a instant and that all stimulas legislation would end as well. This is good news to hear and he also said basically it is going to have to come down to all radio hosts like Sean, Rush, Laura Ingeram to make a stand and start asking the BC questions if the media keeps protecting Obama. This might be the start of something happening this week because I think they have realized after Obamas dismal performance of the crotch bomber that it is time to bring him down once and for all.
I think it’s more of a “stay away from” issue.
Likely decided by Rupert’s corporate lawyers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.