Posted on 01/02/2010 2:07:26 PM PST by Starman417
While the painstaking process of unearthing the "systematic failures" of intelligence on the "underwear bomber" continues, Obama again performs on script. Just as he's done with virtually every past crises - and always while armed with only the bare essentials of information - the now infamous POTUS finger of blame moves away from anyone remotely connected with Obama, his decisions or performance of his appointees, and falls once again on his favorite scapegoat, the CIA.
And the CIA spy chiefs are none to happy about the accusations. It seemed especially harsh when, in an apparent moment of political expedience, Obama was hailing the seven CIA agents slain by a suicide bomber at a US base in the eastern province of Khost 24 hours later.
One day the President is pointing the finger and blaming the intelligence services, saying there is a systemic failure, said one agency official. Now we are heroes. The fact is that we are doing everything humanly possible to stay on top of the security situation. The deaths of our operatives shows just how involved we are on the ground.But CIA bosses claim they were unfairly blamed at a time the covert government agency has been stretched further than ever before in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
They point to the murder of seven operatives at a remote mountain base in Afghanistans Khost Province as an example of how agents are putting their lives on the line at the vanguard of Americas far-flung wars.
~~~Some CIA officials are angry at being criticised by the White House after Abdulmutallab, 23, was allowed to slip through the security net and board a US-bound flight in Amsterdam despite evidence he was a terror threat.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net ...
Their conclusion:
First: There is nothing he is willing to take responsibility for directly. Thats why he has appointed lackeys.
Second: Obamas choice of enemies should be harshly called into question. While he limits any sparse references of war with the global Islamic jihad movement to just AQ, he appears to be waging an all out war with our own intelligence agencies. This is a CiC who needs his priorities straightened out in the worst way.
If the CIA is so pissed-off about always being Obama’s default organization of blame, maybe they should look into conjuring up up the ghost of Lee Harvey Oswald or Sirhan Sirhan. The world needs another conspiracy theory anyway.
Someone posted the exact same sentiments (which I happen to agree with) at Flopping Aces.
Mataharley was not amused.
*Sabotage* Enemies Within the CIA
by
Rowan Scarborough
Read the interview at link if you haven't read the book.
“First: There is nothing he is willing to take responsibility for directly. Thats why he has appointed lackeys.”
I think it is the other way around, the lackeys appointed 0.
“While he limits any sparse references of war with the global Islamic jihad movement to just AQ, he appears to be waging an all out war with our own intelligence agencies.”
This is a problem, for both the “lackeys” and the CIA. He may start acting like he actually is the C-in-C.
See post#24
A Fox News interview here
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Fox_CIA_undermining_War_on_Terror_0717.html
I have the book, well worth the read.
The guys at Powerline did several posts about the CIA’s war against the Bush administration.
For example: http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2004/09/007911.php
IOW
BO: “The buck stops any place but here!”
You’re right. Seriously, he just might start thinking he *can* start acting like CIC and he’s clueless and we can’t be sure which side he’s on and he probably doesn’t know either. He just doesn’t want to be blamed.
Exactly.
There's 12,800 options on google for Rowan Scarborough.
But his name was Barry Soetoro in Indonesia. His school records list him as a Muslim there. When did he change his name back to Barack Obama?
What about Obama ordering execution of CIA agents (7) for killing Afghan children? True?? www.WhatDoesItMean.com/index1317.htm
OK. Thanks for that.
You can Google Rowan Scarborough and read many more interviews by him.
“Seriously, he just might start thinking he *can* start acting like CIC and hes clueless and we cant be sure which side hes on and he probably doesnt know either.”
If he and handlers have out smarted Rahm and Axelrod we are in even deeper trouble.
Yeah, I thought about the martyr angle and decided I don't care about it. They'll make the guy a god regardless.
“Maybe if Obozo gets the CIA riled enough, his REAL birth certificate will show up on the internet”
I was just hoping for the same thing. Would that be considered being a whistleblower” and wouldn’t they be protected somehow?
I’m getting scared and he *is* returning to the WH early. Leaked news continues drip and he’s too far away for comfort. This is what happens when untrustworhty people have to depend on untrustworthy people: nobody can completely trust anyone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.