Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Obama-CIA rift as POTUS deflects blame from self, DNI and appointees
Flopping Aces ^ | 01-02-10 | Mataharley

Posted on 01/02/2010 2:07:26 PM PST by Starman417

While the painstaking process of unearthing the "systematic failures" of intelligence on the "underwear bomber" continues, Obama again performs on script. Just as he's done with virtually every past crises - and always while armed with only the bare essentials of information - the now infamous POTUS finger of blame moves away from anyone remotely connected with Obama, his decisions or performance of his appointees, and falls once again on his favorite scapegoat, the CIA.

And the CIA spy chiefs are none to happy about the accusations. It seemed especially harsh when, in an apparent moment of political expedience, Obama was hailing the seven CIA agents slain by a suicide bomber at a US base in the eastern province of Khost 24 hours later.

One day the President is pointing the finger and blaming the intelligence services, saying there is a systemic failure,’ said one agency official. ‘Now we are heroes. The fact is that we are doing everything humanly possible to stay on top of the security situation. The deaths of our operatives shows just how involved we are on the ground.’

But CIA bosses claim they were unfairly blamed at a time the covert government agency has been stretched further than ever before in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

They point to the murder of seven operatives at a remote mountain base in Afghanistan’s Khost Province as an example of how agents are putting their lives on the line at the vanguard of America’s far-flung wars.

~~~

Some CIA officials are angry at being criticised by the White House after Abdulmutallab, 23, was allowed to slip through the security net and board a US-bound flight in Amsterdam despite evidence he was a terror threat.

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bayofpigs2; bho44; bhoanticia; bhoantiusa; bhocia; bomber; cia; ciaofficers; enemywithin; fauxpresident; fobchapman; munchhausenbyproxy; nationalsecurityfail; nobc; obama; sociopathicpres
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: hoosiermama; Liz; STARWISE; SE Mom; maggief

Their conclusion:

First: There is nothing he is willing to take responsibility for directly. That’s why he has appointed lackeys.

Second: Obama’s choice of enemies should be harshly called into question. While he limits any sparse references of “war” with the global Islamic jihad movement to just AQ, he appears to be waging an all out war with our own intelligence agencies. This is a CiC who needs his priorities straightened out in the worst way.


21 posted on 01/02/2010 3:18:31 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

If the CIA is so pissed-off about always being Obama’s default organization of blame, maybe they should look into conjuring up up the ghost of Lee Harvey Oswald or Sirhan Sirhan. The world needs another conspiracy theory anyway.


22 posted on 01/02/2010 3:18:38 PM PST by ArchAngel1983 (Arch Angel- on guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BARLF

Someone posted the exact same sentiments (which I happen to agree with) at Flopping Aces.

Mataharley was not amused.


23 posted on 01/02/2010 3:23:02 PM PST by stylin_geek (Greed and envy is used by our political class to exploit the rich and poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: norge
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21538

*Sabotage* Enemies Within the CIA

by

Rowan Scarborough

Read the interview at link if you haven't read the book.

24 posted on 01/02/2010 3:24:01 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: onyx

“First: There is nothing he is willing to take responsibility for directly. That’s why he has appointed lackeys.”

I think it is the other way around, the lackeys appointed 0.

“While he limits any sparse references of “war” with the global Islamic jihad movement to just AQ, he appears to be waging an all out war with our own intelligence agencies.”

This is a problem, for both the “lackeys” and the CIA. He may start acting like he actually is the C-in-C.


25 posted on 01/02/2010 3:32:42 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek

See post#24

A Fox News interview here

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Fox_CIA_undermining_War_on_Terror_0717.html

I have the book, well worth the read.


26 posted on 01/02/2010 3:33:00 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BARLF

The guys at Powerline did several posts about the CIA’s war against the Bush administration.

For example: http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2004/09/007911.php


27 posted on 01/02/2010 3:33:15 PM PST by stylin_geek (Greed and envy is used by our political class to exploit the rich and poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: onyx

IOW
BO: “The buck stops any place but here!”


28 posted on 01/02/2010 3:33:26 PM PST by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ArchAngel1983
But the US does NOT need a martyr who is made even more godlike in his death.
29 posted on 01/02/2010 3:36:35 PM PST by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: maggief

You’re right. Seriously, he just might start thinking he *can* start acting like CIC and he’s clueless and we can’t be sure which side he’s on and he probably doesn’t know either. He just doesn’t want to be blamed.


30 posted on 01/02/2010 3:38:09 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Exactly.


31 posted on 01/02/2010 3:39:09 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek
Had not read that article. Thanks

There's 12,800 options on google for Rowan Scarborough.

32 posted on 01/02/2010 3:39:33 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

But his name was Barry Soetoro in Indonesia. His school records list him as a Muslim there. When did he change his name back to Barack Obama?


33 posted on 01/02/2010 3:41:26 PM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

What about Obama ordering execution of CIA agents (7) for killing Afghan children? True?? www.WhatDoesItMean.com/index1317.htm


34 posted on 01/02/2010 3:42:19 PM PST by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BARLF

OK. Thanks for that.


35 posted on 01/02/2010 3:42:30 PM PST by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: norge
My pleasure.

You can Google Rowan Scarborough and read many more interviews by him.

36 posted on 01/02/2010 3:47:06 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: onyx

“Seriously, he just might start thinking he *can* start acting like CIC and he’s clueless and we can’t be sure which side he’s on and he probably doesn’t know either.”

If he and handlers have out smarted Rahm and Axelrod we are in even deeper trouble.


37 posted on 01/02/2010 3:48:30 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
"But the US does NOT need a martyr who is made even more godlike in his death."

Yeah, I thought about the martyr angle and decided I don't care about it. They'll make the guy a god regardless.

38 posted on 01/02/2010 3:49:39 PM PST by ArchAngel1983 (Arch Angel- on guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: teletech

“Maybe if Obozo gets the CIA riled enough, his REAL birth certificate will show up on the internet”

I was just hoping for the same thing. Would that be considered being a whistleblower” and wouldn’t they be protected somehow?


39 posted on 01/02/2010 3:50:33 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I’m getting scared and he *is* returning to the WH early. Leaked news continues drip and he’s too far away for comfort. This is what happens when untrustworhty people have to depend on untrustworthy people: nobody can completely trust anyone.


40 posted on 01/02/2010 3:53:27 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson