>>Terri’s husband was a murderous POS. <<
If you have proof, bring it. If not, you subject FR to libel action.
>>Anyone who can’t see this is supremely dumb and naive. Or is in favor of killing off the innocaent. <<
Or knows more about things like the law than you.
>>Terri’s family was constantly begging to just be allowed to take her home where they would take care of her<<
They had no legal right to do so.
>>You are playing a game of pretend with the situation<<
When it comes to people who wish to enforce their version of morality in the guise of fascism over the law I do not play.
Still haven’t taken the time to find out what your host has said on the subject?
We are not slaves to the law. The law is stretched all the time. The “husband” never visited her never cared about her. He murdered her and you buy into his game because you are are weak minded
I am not a slave and don’t think like a slave
And we are to accept YOUR version of morality where people get to kill each other based on say so? Apparently in your (im)moral world, those who champion death are the ones who get to force their (im)morality on others.
If there is doubt as to what she wanted, they should have erred on the side of caution and let her live.
He could have divorced her, turned her care over to her family completely and washed his hands of the situation. Except for the fact that HE was the one who caused her injuries and if she regained the ability to speak, could have really mucked up his life with her testimony.
And you're defending the actions of a worthless piece of work like that?
Very telling of you.....