And we are to accept YOUR version of morality where people get to kill each other based on say so? Apparently in your (im)moral world, those who champion death are the ones who get to force their (im)morality on others.
If there is doubt as to what she wanted, they should have erred on the side of caution and let her live.
He could have divorced her, turned her care over to her family completely and washed his hands of the situation. Except for the fact that HE was the one who caused her injuries and if she regained the ability to speak, could have really mucked up his life with her testimony.
And you're defending the actions of a worthless piece of work like that?
Very telling of you.....
Going by his previous posts dumb2003 supports Terri Schiavo’s husband doing whatever the heck he wants because dumb2003 fears his own living will will be messed with. He has stated a few times that he and his wife have “made their wishes known” about medical intervention
Two totally different cases.
Dumb2003 and wive have living wills
Terri Sciavo had no living will. Nothing
So instead the courts obeyed the husband’s wishes. The very same person who probably injured Terri and put her in her present state and neglected her for years as she languished in the hospital
Terri’s family stayed loyal and visited her and begged the courts to be allowed to take care of her
Only a total idiot can’t tell who wanted the best for Terri and who loved her.