The problem here is that Miller screwed up royally.
She entered into the Lesbian marriage.
She left the relationship.
She refused to abide by the court order allowing Jenkins visitation.
She fled with the child.
Miller was awarded custody. All she had to do was abide by the visitation ordered by the court.
Look, the judge didn’t set up this mess. The child is being removed from Miller, because Miller refused to follow the guidelines set down by the court and fled with the child.
No custodial parent gets away with that, if visitation has been granted to the non-custodial parent.
I don’t like Jenkins getting the child, but Miller is the one responsible for the outcome.
I don’t understand how the courts consider Jenkins a parent at all, since she has neither a biological nor an adoptive relationship with the child.
“I don’t like Jenkins getting the child, but Miller is the one responsible for the outcome.”
Hear,hear. Glad this lady found Christ, but He didn’t say we only have to obey the laws we like. Happy New Year, DO.
Colonel, USAFR
The last article that I read stated the birth Mom did abide by the ordered visitation and that the child started having problems so Mom stopped the visitation. The lesbian filed for custody on the advice of a gay group. She’d not maintained any contact previous to that, no cards, no visits, no phone calls. The last I heard, it was being explored as to whether Virginia had to abide by a Vermonts court order.
Agreed. A relative of mine refused to show up for her court date to settle visitation issue. The abusive ex-hubby got custody, thought there was never any doubt had she shown up she would have gotten full custody. The courts frown on no-shows. One might as well slap the judge in the face
Miller is now a born again Christian, and that is the reason that Jenkins is furious at her. And by the way, I actually think it was civil union and not a marriage.
This is a gross injustice & travesty. The courts are doing all they can to legitimize the homo/lesbian agenda and to force it down out our throats, and most importantly to destroy a 7 year old girl in the process.
The Virginia Supreme Court, ruled incredibly that the Vermont Court decision held sway & takes precedence over the Virginia court.
Our country is truly gone beserk, with the liberal dumb ass courts & dumb ass liberal politicians doing everything they can to destroy our country and our foundations of Christian, patriotic values & principles. I hope the mother realizes that the politically beserk courts will do all they can to promote the homosexual/lesbian agenda, and that she along with her daughter need to disappear & go into hiding.
Thanks for the additional information. It's always easier to put the puzzle together, when you have all the pieces. I concur with your assessment entirely. She has made the bed she is now being ordered to sleep in. The child loses in the end, but the biological mother can only blame herself.
I do not agree. The woman wanted her daughter to have no contact with a lesbian. I stand with the mother completely on this. Since the courts have ruled the way they have, then the only thing to do would be to flee the courts jurisdiction. I pray that this mother will never ever be found, by this lesbo or any of her twisted supporters, irregardless of the fprmer custody decree. I would even help the mother evade the damned authorities.
That doesn't mean the decision isn't harmful to the child. How about a punishment for the mother that doesn't result in the child being shipped off to a woman she barely knows and having her life disrupted?
Exactly right.. Well said. I am no advocate of homosexualism, believe me, but it’s not about their sexual orientation in this matter. The precedent is crystalized concerning custodial arrangements.
D-