Posted on 12/21/2009 9:56:56 AM PST by AreaMan
James Cameron's "Avatar" is the most amazing ... no, wait: the most staggeringly amazing, jaw-droppingly triple-awesome unbelievable movie ever made. That's the feeling among the reviewers aggregated at Rotten Tomatoes, anyway. I quote:
"An overwhelming feast of visual artistry unlike anything you have ever seen before."
"Much more than a film. It's a prescribed cinematic experience."
"An entertainment to be not just seen but absorbed on a molecular level."
"Cameron has achieved no less than a rebirth of cinema."
"Make sure you can say you were there when the future of cinema began."
What, are we all techno-fanboys now? Or just unpaid studio publicists? "Avatar" without question represents a new high point in motion-capture technology the digital technique whereby the movements of human actors are used as the armature for animating fanciful characters. (Peter Jackson's Gollum in "Lord of the Rings" was the breakthrough in this area.) And the movie offers deep 3-D panoramas of computer-generated imagery that really are stunning. (For the first two hours, anyway at which point there are still 40-some minutes left to go.)
But all of this expensive tech has been put at the service of a story so triflingly generic, you wonder why anyone would bother to tell it. Briefly: Paraplegic ex-Marine Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) gets selected to participate in the Avatar program, a sort of military-industrial project engaged in plundering the natural resources of the faraway planet of Pandora. Of particular interest is a mineral called "unobtainium" (yes, really), which could be the solution to the apparently eternal energy crisis back on Earth. Unfortunately, Pandora's inhabitants, the Na'vi who are bright blue and 10 feet tall, with long, whippy tails are settled on a vast field of this stuff, and they don't want to move. The humans are of two minds about this problem. Dr. Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver), who heads the science team to which Jake has been assigned, wants to befriend the Na'vi and negotiate with them. To this end, "avatars" have been created Na'vi-like figures fabricated out of human and Na'vi DNA that can be remotely powered by human "drivers" in the base headquarters and sent out among the natives to make friends and learn their language and their charmingly primitive ways.
On the other hand, the project's snarling security chief, Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang), and resident corporate greedhead Parker Selfridge (Giovanni Ribisi) would just as soon exterminate the Na'vi ("fly-bitten savages who live in trees," as Selfridge puts it) and seize their land. To this end, Quaritch secretly recruits Jake to bring back useful military intel from his nice-making science explorations among the Na'vi. Jake is okay with this at first, until he really gets to know the locals especially a Na'vi princess called Neytiri (Zoe Saldana). So the plot boils down to this: Can Jake win Neytiri's heart (or whatever) and foil his fellow humans' plan for corporate conquest? Even as the movie's long, unhurried opening sequences are laying out all the relevant info, you can hear those questions answering themselves.
Fortunately, Cameron is a great action director. There's a lot to look at here: the luminescent glow of the jungle in which the Na'vi live, the ancient Tree of Souls with which they commune, a spectacular range of mountains hanging high in the sky up above Pandora and there's a lot going on. The director and his battalion of digital technicians have cooked up a fantastical bestiary of Pandoran creatures futuristic hammerhead rhinos; dogfighting battle dragons; and, in one virtuoso sequence, a vicious six-legged thingy that chases Jake through the jungle and off the edge of a cliff (see trailer). The meticulous detail in which these creatures have been rendered, and the complexity with which they're arrayed in the film's exotic environments, are undeniable marvels of moviemaking art.
Unfortunately, whenever the action lets up and we're returned to the piddling story, the picture slumps like a failed soufflé. It's also heavily laced with political instruction of a most familiar sort. Cameron, who's now 55, is a self-acknowledged aging hippie, and his boomer worldview is strictly by-the-numbers. Quaritch and Selfridge are evil Americans despoiling the Na'vi's idyllic planet in exactly the same way that the humans have (we're told) trashed their own native orb. The invaders are armed with deplorable corporate technology (an odd animosity in a major-studio movie that reportedly cost more than $300 million to make), and they speak the familiar and here rather anachronistic language of contemporary American warmongering. ("We will fight terror with terror!" "It's some kind of shock-and-awe campaign!")
The Na'vi, on the other hand, with their bows and arrows and long braided hair, are stand-ins for every spiritually astute and ecologically conscientious indigenous population ever ground down under the heel of rampaging Western imperialism. They appear to have no warlike impulses themselves, and they live in complete harmony with their environment. (They even talk to trees.) Why, the movie asks, as if the question were new, can't we be more like them?
The central question that "Avatar" poses, however, is whether expensively advanced filmmaking technology is enough in itself to carry a whole film. The story here is a simple mash-up of every old cowboys-and-Indians and jungle-adventure movie of the 1930s and '40s. And while Saldana manages to project shadings of emotion through her digital carapace, and Worthington and Joel David Moore (as a friendly biologist) bring nice-guy appeal to their roles, the characters are blandly conceived. We watch them go about their business advancing the predictable plot and uttering Cameron's sometimes clunky dialogue ("The sky people have sent us a message!" "This land is our land!"), and we wonder when the battle-dragons will come swooping back in to break the tedium. In the story, the machines don't win, of course; but in the tech-centric scheme of the movie, they conquer all.
Very true, I read a comparison to Dances With Wolves in that regard as well, which seems apt.
Personally, I don't care if Hollywood wants to keep making propaganda films, but I'm not interested in paying to watch them. It just seems that propaganda should be paid for by the people who are attempting to sway others to their viewpoint. So liberals should buy everyone tickets for Avatar...and if they throw in popcorn and $50 bucks for my time I'd go.
Really. You wonder if anyone in Hollywood would ever fight for anything if the remote possibility existed that they would come out looking like chumps.
Well, I can think of one thing where at least they're coming out looking like dunces: the Global Warming/Climate Change hoax.
I really wasn't concerned about the holes in the story as much as the parts that were completely filled in.
I hear you. I can't argue with it. They're there.
Also, nice how in the future the VA is still screwing over the troops.
In James Cameron's future, yes, sorry to say.
I’m surprised this review came from Kurt Loder, who I thought was a typical MTV lefty. When Pink Floyd’s uber-left opus “The Final Cut” came out in 1983, he gushed all over it in Rolling Stone.
I didn’t see it as racist at all. They didn’t portray the natives as backward, just different. The human had to lead because he was familiar with the military equipment, but the natives came off as intelligent, just in their own way. The only really bad guys were a corporate exec and a marine. The good guys were also human, a marine and a couple of scientists. It was just a struggle between good and evil, and it was human against human. I imagine that there are so many paralells to so many things, people will be reading into it for years. It’s worth a look, definately see it on the big screen, it’s quite an experience.
I appreciate your input. As I haven’t seen the movie I’m only relating some of the reviews I’ve seen. It’s interesting how much buzz (some good some bad) there is on this movie. I’d wager that the director can be nothing but happy his film is generating a reaction from a broad range of people.
You just have to go into it with an open mind. All the politics aside, if you are a fan of the visual arts, this movie is worth a look. It is a thing of beauty. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.