Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/20/2009 3:01:29 PM PST by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeStatement

I read this story when he first arrested and I thought, what a waste of time, but as usual I am dumbfounded as to how our court system works...


2 posted on 12/20/2009 3:05:15 PM PST by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AOikY323zc


4 posted on 12/20/2009 3:10:35 PM PST by mkjessup (Dec 20, 1941 - President Franklin D. 0bama changes his name to "Kyushu 0bama San")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Here’s a very detailed account of the incidents:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/18/AR2009121804027.html


5 posted on 12/20/2009 3:11:21 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

The woman was a busy body cops wife, she was a nut from the get go, the same as her half wit of a husband. Actually probably did not know they made them that big. LOL


7 posted on 12/20/2009 3:13:30 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

The woman was a busy body cops wife, she was a nut from the get go, the same as her half wit of a husband. Actually probably did not know they made them that big. LOL


8 posted on 12/20/2009 3:13:39 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

“larger principle is at stake.”

Yeah what? The women objected to seeing this guys little thimble in the window. Sounds to me like he is no Tiger Woods!


10 posted on 12/20/2009 3:16:33 PM PST by Dem Guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

If a man is observed by a women naked in his own home he gets charged with indecent exposure, if a women is naked in her own home and is observed by a man he gets charged as a peeping tom.
Jack


11 posted on 12/20/2009 3:17:55 PM PST by btcusn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

He’s probably one of those types that Sen. Whitehouse was talking about.


16 posted on 12/20/2009 3:22:05 PM PST by donhunt ("The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

In some states/cities women can walk around nude and topless but someone inside their own home can be found guilty?

He must be pretty ugly.

heh.


17 posted on 12/20/2009 3:27:08 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement
A head shot of the perp:


21 posted on 12/20/2009 3:35:06 PM PST by DemforBush (Now officially 100% ex-Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

The original story, like this one, suggested that the woman and her son were taking a shortcut through this guy’s yard. If so, then that’s their problem.

But this story says that a second witness, the librarian, saw him naked through a picture window from her car on the street. If so, that strikes me as another matter entirely.

Sure, you can run around your home or property naked, but I don’t think you have a right to do it where people can see you from the street or sidewalk or other public property. Pull the curtains, or put some clothes on.

It certainly sounds as if this jerk was not just naked in private, but was deliberately flashing himself in public. That’s not right.


22 posted on 12/20/2009 3:39:51 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

That this case made it to a courtroom is shocking. A woman, on private property without permission, looks in someone’s window and then calls the cops because she sees someone naked? Arrest her for being a peeping tom, and overturn this idiotic conviction.


23 posted on 12/20/2009 3:42:47 PM PST by kingu (Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

“Yes officer - he’s walking around naked. If you’d care to step into the bathroom and step on the toilet and if you stretch yourself real high and lean to the left a bit you can focus your binoculars on his bedroom window” ...


30 posted on 12/20/2009 4:18:46 PM PST by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

If I recall the story correctly, this guy was making his morning coffee alone in his kitchen, when some woman decided to cut through his property on her way to somewhere else, and, not content with that, peered into his window. She should have been convicted both of criminal trespass and of peeping.


33 posted on 12/20/2009 4:44:57 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement
I occasionally will walk around the house in my undies, but I am careful to not walk where I can be viewed publicly. I think most reasonable understand that yes, you can be viewed if you live close enough to the street. Now if someone is walking in my yard and gets around my back windows, that is their fault, not mine.

I think any sane judge would understand this. The problem lies in people that will take this ruling (if found not guilty) and use it for other purposes. Imagine a person that gets large screen tv's and put them up showing porn 24/7 where it is viewable from the road and sidewalks.

I can see people donating (a collection jar like some Christmas homes use) to walk around yards where women are naked in a house to skirt anti nude rules in a town.

The potential for abuse would be huge.

Innocent ... walking around the house after a shower to get a glass of tea before getting dressed to cool off around the back kitchen area and someone gets an eyeful while crossing your lawn.

Not innocent..... standing in a uncovered backlit window doing lewd behavior in plain view of those at sidewalk distance for hours at a time.

39 posted on 12/20/2009 5:54:58 PM PST by LowOiL ("I adore McCain, support him 100% and will do everything I can to support his reelection" S. Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

I used to live next door to nudists when I lived in DC. It never dawned on me I could call and complain they weren’t into the whole keeping their curtains drawn. However, their house was set back from the street, it was only their neighbors who got the full monty.
This ruling makes the libertarian in me rather nervous.


46 posted on 12/20/2009 9:39:21 PM PST by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

Why didn’t the cops arrest the peeping Tammies? I thought looking through peoples windows to get your jollies was a crime in most states and cities?


48 posted on 12/20/2009 10:44:51 PM PST by JLS (Democrats: People who wont even let you enjoy an unseasonably warm winter day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

I worked 2nd shift for years after I retired from the Navy, got real tired of these people knocking on my door about 10:00 AM 3-4 times a week to save my soul. Answered the door ONE time naked, with nothing in my hands except my 1911. Never got bothered again.
Jack


49 posted on 12/21/2009 3:01:43 AM PST by btcusn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson