Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Senate Should Vote Yes on Health Care (by Plugs Biden - the gaff that keeps on giving)
NY Times ^ | 12/19/09 | JOE BIDEN

Posted on 12/20/2009 1:53:22 AM PST by Libloather

Why the Senate Should Vote Yes on Health Care
By JOE BIDEN
Published: December 19, 2009

IF I were still a United States senator, I would not only vote yes on the current health care reform bill, I would do so with the sure knowledge that I was casting one of the most historic votes of my 36 years in the Senate. I would vote yes knowing that the bill represents the culmination of a struggle begun by Theodore Roosevelt nearly a century ago to make health care reform a reality. And while it does not contain every measure President Obama and I wanted, I would vote yes for this bill certain that it includes the fundamental, essential change that opponents of reform have resisted for generations.

We have been here before. In the past, as the moment of decision drew nearer, criticism from both the left and the right grew louder. Compromises were derided. The perfect became the enemy of the good.

**SNIP**

That is not all. President Obama and I know we have to put our fiscal house in order. This is why those who claim they oppose reform because they fear for our country’s fiscal stability should finally acknowledge what the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office makes crystal clear: not only is the Senate bill paid for, it is this country’s single largest deficit-reduction measure in a dozen years.

I share the frustration of other progressives that the Senate bill does not include a public option. But I’ve been around a long time, and I know that in Washington big changes never emerge in perfect form.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biden; gaff; healthcare; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Too much crap to insert in one post.

Merry Christmas.

(Can I still say that under the new Deathcare™ bill?)

1 posted on 12/20/2009 1:53:22 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"Let's hear it for healthcare! Hoo-rah! Hoo-rah!"


2 posted on 12/20/2009 1:57:47 AM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“historic vote” yup, gotta agree with that.


3 posted on 12/20/2009 1:59:41 AM PST by exnavy (God save the republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

not sure if its a gift that keeps on giving. NOONE CARES what stupid thing he says next. We only care when Obama say stupid things


4 posted on 12/20/2009 2:01:42 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulycy
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
5 posted on 12/20/2009 2:06:03 AM PST by MtnMan101 (THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIALISUM IS THAT YOU EVENTUALLY RUN OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnMan101

I like it. Clean house. (Except for the excess feathers and tar stains.)


6 posted on 12/20/2009 2:10:04 AM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I bet Joe thinks this 0bamacare bill is as “historic” as when FDR addressed the nation on television during the Depression (before FDR became President, and before Americans had television sets). Did Joe Biden copy this from Neil Kinnock too?


7 posted on 12/20/2009 2:14:08 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It would be best for them to lay of the use of “historic”. Treason can and often is “historic”. Witness Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.


8 posted on 12/20/2009 2:21:23 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

This is not Reform. This is a very simple plan. Make well people pay more and ration care to the sick. Individual insurance is eliminated. It is a collectivist dream of fairness. Of course it will not work. It never has and never will. It is needed to cover up the bankrupted failure of prior government plans. Liberal solution? As usual...more Liberalism.


9 posted on 12/20/2009 2:32:27 AM PST by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Insurance companies will no longer be able to deny coverage to those with pre-existing conditions or drop coverage when people get sick. Charging exorbitant premiums based on sex, age or health status will be outlawed. Annual and lifetime caps on benefits will be history. Those who already have insurance will be able to keep it, and will gain peace of mind knowing they won’t be priced out of the market by skyrocketing premiums.

Desirable as it may be for people with pre-existing conditions to be able to obtain insurance, is it equally desirable that insurance premiums will have to be increased to compensate insurance companies for the losses they will sustain by insuring people who are already sick? Likewise, if insurance companies drop people who get sick, that reduces premiums for the rest of us. If they are prohibited from doing this, the rest of us will have to pay higher premiums to achieve what appears on the surface to be a laudable goal. In short, every one of the "reforms" lauded by the vice president will require insurance companies to raise premiums elsewhere. Yet the vice president concludes his paragraph with this improbable assurance: "Those who already have insurance will be able to keep it, and will gain peace of mind knowing they won’t be priced out of the market by skyrocketing premiums."

Leftists gain a lot of mileage by ignoring Newtonian laws of economics. Biden is essentially assuring the folks that one can take more money out of insurance companies without putting more money into insurance companies. He is lying and he knows it.

The question is, do the folks know it?


10 posted on 12/20/2009 2:33:52 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

A general question-anyone know if this conscientious objector (against paying for the murder of the unborn human babies) will have to pay? It is against my religion.


11 posted on 12/20/2009 2:43:30 AM PST by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The man is totally delusional.


12 posted on 12/20/2009 2:57:23 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

U.S. Constitution: Thirteenth Amendment
Thirteenth Amendment - Slavery And Involuntary Servitude
Amendment Text | Annotations
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

What do democrats call it when they promise the state of Nebraska that the federal government would pick up Nebraska’s share the the bill’s proposed expansion of Medicaid for “ever” in order to get Ben Nelsons vote?

Isn’t that involuntary servitude also known as SLAVERY for the citizens of the other 49 states to be forced to work and pay for Nebraska’s share of the expansion of Medicaid???

What happened to equality? Are the citizens of Nebraska better then the citizens of the other 49 states? Why have the rest of the states been offered up into involuntary servitude to work and pay for Nebraska’s share?


13 posted on 12/20/2009 3:02:05 AM PST by GloriaJane (http://www.last.fm/user/GloriaJane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulycy
(Except for the excess feathers and tar stains.)

GOOP gets out nasty tar stains (wish it worked on politicians)

14 posted on 12/20/2009 3:11:48 AM PST by This_far (Mandatory insurance! I thought it was about health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Vice Idiot Joe "nobody messes with me" Biden

15 posted on 12/20/2009 3:26:23 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
If you follow the logic of this, with insurance companies being forced to cover people who they know from the point of signing the policy are going to take an inordinate amount of money from the pool, at some point it becomes unsustainable. Here in Massachusetts, some years ago a number of auto insurance companies simply closed up shop, and who was left to pick up the pieces? The other companies, of course.

But this whole bill is merely one step in the ultimate goal, which is of getting the insurance companies to close up shop across the country as they are required to sell policies to people they never would if they were to only deal on what they would consider a profitable model. One thing this bill does is guarantee that insurance companies will lose money. Whatever one thinks of these companies, their services are desired by the public.

So we get down to the one and only point of this and any bill the democrats pass, which is sowing the seeds of the insurance companies' ultimate demise, leaving some future democrat congress to step in and say "We must have federal takeover of the insurance industry, just like we took over the job of airport security, because we can't put people's lives in the hands of evil businessmen."

All of this is about Barney Frank's "foot in the door" for socialized medicine. The key to understanding this is the fever that burns within the dems to get this thing passed, even though the polls say it's suicide for them. Individual senators, just like people who partake in high-risk investment or gambling or sports, don't think THEY will be the ones who catch the bullet. It's self-delusion, because the risk is thrilling--if they make it through the next few elections, they will be there when the insurance companies collapse, and they will be there to "give" us all "free" healthcare, and thus control our actual lives.

This is the goal of all liberals, and all statists who believe they can actually create a perfect society, if those stupid capitalists will just get out of the way and hand over the money.

These same people are led by a guy who's never even managed a 7-11. And they want to control society, because, well, they just KNOW how to tell people the way they SHOULD live (such as Hillary's bunch know better for the kids than their own parents).

All of this is connected, and it's all part of the same goal.

16 posted on 12/20/2009 3:37:20 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (Godspeed, T, on your fourth tour of duty in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Gotta go Joe

17 posted on 12/20/2009 3:37:25 AM PST by don-o (My son, Ben - Marine Lance Corporal is in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Biden: open mouth, idiocy spews.

This poster child for “A mind is a terrible thing to waste” is a certifiable lunatic. He is a child abuser - abortion is the ultimate child abuse - and should be in a staight jacket. His druggie family is a prime example of inbreeding gone awry.


18 posted on 12/20/2009 3:40:11 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

They will be spinning this until the November 2010 election. We have already received a number of calls from our Senators and Congressman on why this is important. The spin won’t work, especially when they start taking the taxes.

I wrote my Senators today. I said Ben got Harry to pick up Nebraska’s Medicaid costs. What did they do for VA?


19 posted on 12/20/2009 4:08:12 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

I would vote yes on the current health care reform bill,come on Chuck stand up you with me on this.


20 posted on 12/20/2009 4:29:33 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson