Look, guy, I’ve tried to be generous and considerate despite our difference of opinion on this. That evidently isn’t good enough for you.
My comments were quite clear to many who read them. That’s good enough for me.
+++++++++++++
Look, you opened up this can of worms - don’t blame me for that! Take some responsiblity. *What* you said was confusing and caused distress for many reading your post, enough so that even *you* felt the need to issue a long clarification. That’s all I’ve said - that it was content and not ‘style differences’. :)
I have taken responsibility. I wrote a scathing damnation of those who support killing the unborn. Rather than express agreement with that, you chose to trash me for being a misogynist.
What I said was not confusing. What I said was crystal clear. Others were able to read it and understand exactly what I was trying to say. You obviously still can’t, even after I took time to explain it to you.
I took a pass on saying that prior to now, because I didn’t want to take you to the wood shed simply because you disagreed on the tactics I used. At some point, that disagreement becomes less of a disagreement on style, and more of a trashing of me just because you don’t like the way I decided to frame this issue.
Well too bad. My posting style is my own. It’s a part of that sticky wicket, the first amendment. I took pains to tell you precisely what my goal was. I took pains to tell you precisely what my mindset was. I told you precisely what each sentence meant to me. And you are in effect telling me, “No, that isn’t what you meant. You meant to demean women.”
Well, if that’s all your deficient little cranium can accept, that’s all your tiny little cranium can accept.
It’s not my problem.
The only can of worms opened here, is the can of worms that is expressed by your lack of comprehension skills.