Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Letter to attorney general Eric Holder (From Orly Taitz)
December 14, 2009 | Orly Taitz

Posted on 12/15/2009 5:15:04 PM PST by Man50D

Law Offices of Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita parkway ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Phone 949-683-5411 Fax 949-766-7603

12.14.09.

Via Certified Mail

Attn Mr. Eric Holder

United States Attorney General

950 Pennsylvania Ave NW

Washington DC 20530-0001 USA

Dear Mr. Holder,

On March 1st on behalf of my clients I have submitted to you a request to file Quo Warranto against Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. The request was filed due to following troubling facts:

1. According to a number of licensed investigators National Databases show Mr. Obama using as many as 39 different Social Security numbers, which included the numbers of deceased individuals and numbers never assigned.

2. Number 042-68-4425 that Mr. Obama used for most of his life and is currently using while residing in the White House, is a number assigned to an individual born in 1890, who resided in the state of Connecticut and this Social Security number was issued in the state of Connecticut where Mr. Obama never resided.

3. One of the leading forensic experts in the country Ms. Sandra Ramsey Lines has prepared an affidavit, stating that Mr. Obama’s short version Certification of Life Birth cannot be treated as genuine without seeing the original on file in the Health Department in HI.

4. The state of Hawaii since 1911 had in its statutes a provision allowing Foreign born children of Hawaiian residents of get Hawaiian Birth Certificates(currently statute 338-17) and currently statute 338-5 allows one to get a birth certificate based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence from the hospital.

5. In spite of over 100 law suits filed around the country and 12 Citizen Grand Jury indictments Mr. Obama refused to sign a consent to unseal his original birth certificate currently sealed in the Health Department of the state of Hawaii and all the other vital records.

6. Ms. Chiuomi Fukino, Director of the Health Department of the State of Hawaii has provided a statement that there is a document on file in Hawaii, however she refused to provide any information, as to what document is on file: whether it is a Birth Certificate given to a foreign born child of Hawaiian resident, whether it is an amended Birth certificate, obtained when Mr. Obama was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather. She refused to answer any questions as to whether his birth certificate was obtained based on a proper hospital birth certificate or based on a statement of one of his relatives only, which needs to be corroborated.

7. Regardless of place of birth of Mr. Obama, since birth and until now Mr. Obama had a split allegiance. He had British citizenship at birth, Kenyan since age 2 and Indonesian since age 5. Allegiance to other Nations goes as a clear violation of the Natural citizenship clause of the article 2 section 1 of the Constitution.

8. Under the Freedom of Information act 5 US 552, since no response was provided to numerous certified mail letters received by your office nine months ago, I demand a written response or Administrative hearing on the matter within 30 days. On behalf of my clients I demand an answer, as to when the Quo Warranto against Mr. Obama will be filed by the US Attorney General office, or in the alternative if the Attorney General office refuses to file Quo Warranto, I demand an ex-relator status for my clients to proceed with the Quo Warranto action against Mr. Obama in the DC court or the Supreme Court of the United States.

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

Counsel to the plaintiffs-ex relators.

Attachment

Quo Warranto request, Dossiers


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhodoj; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obamaisabirther; orlytaitz; taitz; whackamole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: ExTexasRedhead
This question and information should be mentioned on all the talk shows and on billboards. Why isn’t it?

That's the question of the decade. Besides the social security number fiasco, it makes no sense whatsoever that millions of dollars have been spent keeping every personal record from the time of his birth onward under lock, key and possible/probable threat of who knows what. He wrote a book about himself and should be proud to show proof to back up his biography.

IMHO this purposeful omission and cover up will one day be one of the biggest scandals ever.

21 posted on 12/15/2009 8:45:28 PM PST by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Thanks for the ping Bitt!


22 posted on 12/15/2009 9:23:16 PM PST by potlatch (ACTIONS - Speak Louder Than Words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

Everything he does or says is a lie.


23 posted on 12/15/2009 11:49:47 PM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

I didn’t know social security cards went back that far?


24 posted on 12/16/2009 2:27:09 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
I didn’t know social security cards went back that far?

If the individual was born in 1890, he would have been 45 years old when the social security system was enacted in 1935 and he was assigned a number.


25 posted on 12/16/2009 3:43:31 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
In attempting to secure a Writ of Quo Warranto, The AG must be asked first. Since the law requires him to defend the President against it, he will turn it down. Then, the petitioner is free to ask the Court directly.

As far as the BC goes, Hawaii is required by it's own Freedom of Information laws, which are quite sweeping in scope, to provide it. They are stonewalling in state courts. Dr. Taitz, who as an American lawyer is a great Russian dentist, neglected this avenue of approach until just a few months ago, instead bringing action in courts where it was a foregone conlusion that her clients would not not have standing.

No matter what any court in the land decides about BHO, Jr.'s obvious ineligibility, it would still be up to Congress to remove him, via impeachment and conviction in the Senate. Fat F%$^&kin'Chance!

Ironically, the Constitution they undermined, protects Team Obama. IMHO, establishment of his ineligibility and the definition of "Natural Born Citizen" must be sought to prevent this travesty from ever happening again.

Bottom line: you are going to be looking at and listening to an ineligible POTUS everyday until 2012 and the end of his illegitimate term. We must hamstring him in the Congressional elections of 2012. Damage control is our only option.

Congress, as The Electoral College has knowingly given us an ineligible POTUS, de facto but not de jure. They will not remove him.

26 posted on 12/16/2009 5:31:29 AM PST by Kenny Bunk ("Let only Americans stand guard tonight." Gen. G. Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Sorry Cicero, meant to say the Congressional Elections of 2010.


27 posted on 12/16/2009 5:33:43 AM PST by Kenny Bunk ("Let only Americans stand guard tonight." Gen. G. Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; bitt; Man50D; potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; Boazo; Alamo-Girl; PhilDragoo; ...

Don’t-shoot-the-messenger ping


28 posted on 12/16/2009 5:51:45 AM PST by Kenny Bunk ("Let only Americans stand guard tonight." Gen. G. Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Thanks. I figured that Orly had some reason to send this request to Holder, and that she anticipated that he would refuse to act.

We need to do everything we possibly can to weaken Obama politically and prevent him from passing any more country-destroying legislation. Tanking his poll numbers is one way. Taking control of congress is another. But that won’t happen for at least another year, so we need to cut the legs from under him now and make him a very early lame duck.

Whether or not she finds an honest judge who is courageous enough to do anything, she has certainly done more than most people to cast doubt on Obama and weaken his reputation.


29 posted on 12/16/2009 9:13:08 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Whether or not she finds an honest judge who is courageous enough to do anything

Cicero, Dr. Taitz has already met several judges who bent over backwards to offer her advice and instruction on how to best procede with her cases.

She has uniformly offered them actionable contempt in return. Of course, she has also run into partisan judicial hacks who torpedoed her pleadings. She also returned their hostile fire, which of course is a lawyer no-no!

I believe her biggest mistake is her attempt to split the difference on the "Birther" issue, and then to throw the Natural Born Citizen constitutional issue in with it, in the same pleadings. Doesn't work, as she has by now realized. Related, but legally different issues.

SHE KEPT EVERYTHING ALIVE. And she drew a lot of hostile fire, enabling efforts with a better legal foundation to move ahead. A brave, and unique character!

30 posted on 12/16/2009 9:48:40 AM PST by Kenny Bunk ("Let only Americans stand guard tonight." Gen. G. Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
or in the alternative if the Attorney General office refuses to file Quo Warranto, I demand an ex-relator status for my clients to proceed with the Quo Warranto action against Mr. Obama in the DC court or the Supreme Court of the United States.

Ex-relator?

I need help with that one??

She certainly is persistent a "mudslinger," hopefully some mud will stick to the wall???

31 posted on 12/16/2009 12:54:01 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Thanks and bump, Kenny.


32 posted on 12/16/2009 1:24:41 PM PST by potlatch (ACTIONS - Speak Louder Than Words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: All

JB Williams
Canada Free Press

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999

(snip)
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.

(snip)
But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.

(snip)
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup. The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated only by political self-preservation.

(Snip)
Americans keep asking what they can do because they see that none of their leaders are doing anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. It’s the right question, because those leaders are NOT going to stop this thing.

(Snip)
WHO WILL SAVE FREEDOM?
A brave few… This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.

(Snip)
DR. ORLY TAITZ, Phil Berg and Gary Kreep, ALL OF WHOM HAVE MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP.

(Snip)
A PRECIOUS FEW, BUT THEY EXIST… and the walls are indeed closing in on Obama and his evil cabal. IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FAIL TO GET BEHIND THESE BRAVE FEW WHO ARE SEEKING PEACEFUL REDRESS, ALL THE PEACEFUL OPTIONS WILL EVAPORATE AS IF THEY NEVER EXISTED. WE WILL RETURN TO A PRE-1776 AMERICA OVERNIGHT..

Do YOU fear Obama?
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999

___________________________________

A precious few, indeed. Lets get behind those few brave patriots who are out there in the trenches every day working to prove Obama’s inelgibility:

Dr. Orly has put her life’s blood into this fight. SHE HAS MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP FROM COWARDLY REPUBLICANS AND THE SCOTUS.

Dr. Orly is the ONLY one out there in the trenches EVERY day hitting Obama on multiple fronts and trying to bring him down. It is reported that she is more than $8,000 in debt from using her own funds for expenses in her flights across the U.S for interviews, speeches, serving papers and meeting with officials.

She has even gone to Isreal and Russia to spread the message about Obama’s inelgibility!

She states the case expertly, including the bc and natural born citizen aspect, when not abused by the U.S. state-controlled media. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132880

Sure, Dr. Orly makes mistakes. We all do. But Dr. Orly is no dummy. How many of us could go to a foreign country, learn 5 languages, establish a successful dental practice, a successful real estate business AND pass the California state bar- one of the hardest in the U.S. to pass?
She may be a ‘mail order’ attorney and not a Harvard lawyer, but she IS an attorney with all the rights and privilages of a Harvard lawyer nevertheless!
The point is; she has the passion, the zeal, the courage of her convictions and the love of America and its freedoms (unlike many of our ‘great’ attorneys and ‘patriots’ who criticize her) that will not let her give up!
She is exhausted. She is nervous. She is frustrated. It is reported that she gets by on 4-5 hours of sleep per night, and her family is very worried about her health- as well as her safety.
She makes mistakes. But she will NOT give up. She will keep on until she gets it right.

So let’s get behind this great little Russian refugee and great American patriot.
Stop tearing her apart. The Obots don’t need our help.
The obots are scared to death of this little lady and her determination. That’s why they come out in droves all over the net on forums, chat rooms and even the national news to attack and ridicule.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcChG5pRTOE&feature=player_embedded


33 posted on 12/16/2009 5:57:29 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: danamco
Legal proceedings which are brought by the attorney general or state prosecutor in the name and behalf of the state, but based on the information and at the complaint of an individual who has a personal interest in the matter, are referred to as "on the relation" (ex relatione) of such person, who is called the relator.

Legal dog-Latin for, "lissen up, Birdbrain, I am the one what done already told you alla this." I am wondering what the legal dog-Latin, "You-all stuck us with this miserable commie SOB with a foreign father, but we sure as Hell ain't gonna let it happen again."

Merry Christmas to you in Danam!

34 posted on 12/17/2009 6:27:43 AM PST by Kenny Bunk ("Let only Americans stand guard tonight." Gen. G. Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Somehow we need to get Judge A.Napolitano to answer a question on NBC. We need an openning for at least discussing the constitutionality of bo.


35 posted on 04/03/2010 6:35:11 PM PDT by DCmarcher-976453 (SARAH PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Go Orly go!


36 posted on 04/03/2010 7:22:14 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
It says she sent it certified, It did not say registered. It also didn't say "return receipt requested" service was added. Additionally "Restricted delivery" may be paid for and requested as part of the "return receipt requested service" for either registered or certified.

Even if sent "restricted" the addressee doesn't have to sign it, one of their agents can sign, if there is a letter on file with the post office saying that person can sign for the addressee's "restricted" mail. Large corporation and government big wigs almost never sign for their own mail.

The addressee also can simply "refuse" the mail, in which case it's returned to sender as "undeliverable - refused."

37 posted on 04/03/2010 7:27:38 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
I didn’t know social security cards went back that far?

The person was *born* in 1890, not issued the SSN then. He or she would have been 45 when Social Security was passed in 1935. So, they would have started paying taxes sometime after that, and would have then needed an SSN.

38 posted on 04/03/2010 9:30:52 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
No matter what any court in the land decides about BHO, Jr.'s obvious ineligibility, it would still be up to Congress to remove him, via impeachment and conviction in the Senate

And if they did not, posthaste, they'd all be looking at the street the next election. Or pitchforks, torches, tar and feathers somewhat sooner than that.

39 posted on 04/03/2010 9:32:47 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bitt; Man50D; potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; Boazo; Alamo-Girl; PhilDragoo; ...
Orly again mixes the very real, with the unreal, and throws in a bit of the foolish.

Unfortunately for us all, this allows the enemy to reject the whole. By building a backlog of pleadings, queries, and correspondence, considered but dismissed, or received without comment, Orly is inadvertently helping Team Obama strengthen their defenses.

Under the Freedom of Information act 5 US 552, since no response was provided to numerous certified mail letters received by your office nine months ago, I demand a written response or Administrative hearing on the matter within 30 days. On behalf of my clients I demand an answer, as to when the Quo Warranto against Mr. Obama will be filed by the US Attorney General office, or in the alternative if the Attorney General office refuses to file Quo Warranto, I demand an ex-relator status for my clients to proceed with the Quo Warranto action against Mr. Obama in the DC court or the Supreme Court of the United States.

That is the heart of the matter. Much of the rest of the letter only adds to the confusion; confusion that aids Team Obama.

40 posted on 04/05/2010 7:44:57 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Obama. He'll bring back States' Rights. In the meantime, this ain't gonna be pretty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson