Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

email from Sen. Webb on Healthcare reform (BARF ALERT)

Posted on 12/15/2009 2:50:35 PM PST by Gopher Broke

Dear Friend,

We thought you might be interested in the following column by Senator Webb published in today's Winchester Star.

http://www.winchesterstar.com/pages/view/still.html

Webb cites concerns, amendments, votes on health care

Sen. Jim Webb

Like all of my colleagues in the Democratic Party, I voted in favor of proceeding to debate the proposed health-care reform legislation. I have yet to decide whether I will support final passage of the bill.

I have stated on several occasions my concerns that the Obama administration should have begun the health-care process with a clear, detailed proposal, from which legislation could then be put into place. Instead, the legislation now before the Congress is the product of five separate congressional committees, three in the House and two in the Senate. I and my staff have carefully worked through thousands of pages of sometimes contradictory information, and have done our best to bring focus to the debate and clarity to any final product.

Our country needs health-care reform. While a strong percentage of Americans are satisfied with their health care, the system is not working for millions of others. Spiraling costs for health care also have placed our biggest industries at a severe competitive disadvantage worldwide, and have become unsustainable for many small businesses.

But true reform must be done in an effective and responsible fashion, without creating a cumbersome, overly bureaucratic system. The bottom line should be to achieve a more cost-effective health-care system that increases accessibility, affordability, and quality of care, and which does not burden our economy along the way.

The process also requires openness, so that the American people understand exactly what is being debated. At the start of this debate I was one of eight senators who called onSenate Majority Leader Harry Reid to post the text and complete budget scores of the health-care bill on a public web site for review at least 72 hours prior to both the first vote and final passage. This request was agreed to, affording proper transparency in the process.

Over the past few weeks, I have taken a number of difficult votes. As with every other issue since I came to the Senate, I have voted my conscience throughout this process. I have broken with my party six times, including four votes to send the current legislation back to committee for a more thorough review.

I voted five times against proposed cuts to Medicare due to my concerns about taking half a trillion dollars out of that system at a time when the pool for Medicare is about to expand with the retirement of those in the Baby Boom generation. I am a long-time supporter of Medicare Advantage programs which have, in my view, greatly improved services in rural areas of Virginia, and I did not want to see cuts to benefits or services.

On the issue of abortion, I studied the bill closely to ensure that no taxpayer dollars will be used to fund abortions. I am convinced that this legislation strictly adheres to the requirements of the Hyde Amendment. It also includes clear conscience provisions for providers and consumers who elect to reject a plan that offers such coverage.

Since drug prices in the U.S. have risen dramatically in recent years — a 9 percent jump in 2009 alone — I have co-sponsored an amendment to lower prescription drug costs. The measure would allow Americans to safely import lower-priced, Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs from other approved countries, and save the federal government nearly $20 billion over the next 10 years.

In summary, I have been doing what I can to shape the bill, for the good of our country and without bowing to party politics. As we continue to debate the bill and amend it, I remain hopeful that the Senate can reach consensus on fair and effective health carelegislation. Whether this is so will determine my vote on final passage.


TOPICS: US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; bornangry; jimwebb; obamacare; va; virginia; webb
Clearly, we need to KEEP THE PRESSURE ON Webb to OPPOSE this horrible govt. takeover of our healthcare system!!
1 posted on 12/15/2009 2:50:36 PM PST by Gopher Broke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

I have repeatedly emailed my senators (Warner & Webb of VA) asking them not to support any expansion of the Federal governments role in health care. Please redouble your efforts.


2 posted on 12/15/2009 3:24:08 PM PST by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

the barf alert here is unwarrented. webb had exactly the same reservations as susan collins of maine who spoke today after lieberman made his speach. lieberman was satisfied that he could vote for the bill since both the single payer option and lowering the age limit to 55 for medicare—would be taken out

collins said she wouldn’t vote for the bill because of her concerns for the gutting of medicare and some inhome provisions. webb expressed exactly the same reservations but didn’t say where he would vote in the end.


3 posted on 12/15/2009 3:58:58 PM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

the barf alert here is unwarrented. webb had exactly the same reservations as susan collins of maine who spoke today after lieberman made his speach. lieberman was satisfied that he could vote for the bill since both the single payer option and lowering the age limit to 55 for medicare—would be taken out

collins said she wouldn’t vote for the bill because of her concerns for the gutting of medicare and some inhome provisions. webb expressed exactly the same reservations but didn’t say where he would vote in the end.

Likely Webb is looking at the massive swing of independant voters in Virginia to the pubbies in november. those are the same people who elected him. he gets it.


4 posted on 12/15/2009 4:01:18 PM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
"Likely Webb is looking at the massive swing of independant voters in Virginia to the pubbies in november. those are the same people who elected him. he gets it."

Is that the same Jim Webb who was a Republican, but decided he'd rather be a democrat even though he'd been treated very well by at least one Republican president? That Jim Webb? Yeah, he gets it. Whatever's in it for Jim Webb, that's what he gets.

5 posted on 12/15/2009 4:10:53 PM PST by RushLake (Liberalism--Domestic terrorism financed by your tax dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RushLake

Whatever’s in it for Jim Webb, that’s what he gets.

Likely the dems say the same thing about Lieberman.

Lieberman may vote for the bill but he’ll make the liberal dems hate what they sign. but whether lieberman votes for or against the bill he’s on fairly safe ground in his state.

Web may vote against the bill because he fears for his political life—because Virginian independents hate this democratic party. Virginia independents are the people who gave webb his victory. he votes against them at his peril.


6 posted on 12/15/2009 6:19:18 PM PST by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson