Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

X-51A WaveRider Gets Airborne
Aviation Week and Space Technology ^ | 12/11/2009 | Graham Warwick

Posted on 12/12/2009 11:01:50 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

The US Air Force Research Laboratory's X-51A WaveRider scramjet engine demonstrator completed its first captive-carry flight under the wing of its B-52H mothership from Edwards AFB on Dec. 9. The first free flight is planned for mid-February.

The B-52 climbed to the planned launch altitude of 50,000ft during a 1.4h flight that checked out systems and telemetry. The next flight, planned for mid-January, will be a full dress-rehearsal for the first of four planned X-51A hypersonic test flights.

The Boeing-built X-51A will be released at 50,000ft over the Pacific and accelerated to Mach 4.5 by a solid rocket booster. The cruiser will then separate and its hydrocarbon-fuelled scramjet, developed by Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, will ignite and run for about 300 seconds, accelerating the vehicle to Mach 6.

That's the plan, anyway, and the Air Force has four shots to prove that practical hypersonic propulsion is a reality. Tests of the fuel-cooled scramjet have gone well on the ground, but a lot is riding on the X-51A. If it succeeds, missile and other applications could quickly follow. If it fails, hypersonics could be set back for years.

(Excerpt) Read more at aviationweek.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aerospacevalley; airforce; antelopevalley; aviation; avionics; bloggersandpersonal; boeing; darpa; edwardsafb; experimentalplane; hypersonic; miltech; mothership; prattwhitney; ramjet; rocketdyne; scramjet; technical; usaf; waverider; x51; xplanes

1 posted on 12/12/2009 11:01:50 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

2 posted on 12/12/2009 11:06:37 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 325 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Photo: US Air Force

3 posted on 12/13/2009 3:56:48 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
Up close...


4 posted on 12/13/2009 6:07:15 AM PST by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

For what purpose is this technology being developed?


5 posted on 12/13/2009 6:32:27 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Lukenbach Texas is barely there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

To preserve, protect and defend the United States of Ameerica


6 posted on 12/13/2009 6:38:47 AM PST by pietraynor (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pietraynor

Well, I know that.

But is it a nuclear weapon carrier to replace ballistic missiles or manned aircraft or what?


7 posted on 12/13/2009 6:45:28 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Lukenbach Texas is barely there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bert

scram jet technology can replace current cruise missile motors, aircraft jet engines and possibly spacecraft luanching motors. It has multiple uses.


8 posted on 12/13/2009 6:48:45 AM PST by pietraynor (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bert

Hypersonic jets would move 3 or 4 times faster than anything we have in out arsenal right now. Imagine making a cruise missile that goes so fast that your enemies can’t hit it.

Practical applications include making airliners that can fly from New York to Tokyo in 2 hours. (See the “Yankee Clipper” idea proposed during the Reagan years. A working hypersonic engine could make that a reality.)


9 posted on 12/13/2009 6:53:37 AM PST by hoagy62 (Obama: slowly sucking the positive attitude out of the US since 11-4-08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
Imagine making a cruise missile that goes so fast that your enemies can’t hit it.
A vehicle traveling at zero speed can "hit" a vehicle traveling at x speed regardless of the value of x. "Hitting" only requires a delta V. In fact, the faster your target goes the less "V" you have to provide to increase the energy (proportional to deltaV^2) at impact.
10 posted on 12/13/2009 8:23:50 AM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
But how do you get a hypersonic airliner up to speed for the scramjet to light? It's one thing for a B52 to carry something (the size of a cruise missile) to 50K ft. then touch off a solid motor to boost the device to MACH+ speeds and then fire up the scramjet.

How do you do that economically for a commercial airliner?

I guess I could envision some sort of three stage motor. Regular jet to get you off the ground and up there; a ramjet to get you to MACH, and then the SCRAM to hyper MACH.

That's going to be one complex piece of machinery.

11 posted on 12/13/2009 9:31:33 AM PST by AFreeBird (Going Rogue in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper

You just have to One: see it coming. Two: figure out it’s course and speed. And Three: put something in its path before it gets there.


12 posted on 12/13/2009 9:34:52 AM PST by AFreeBird (Going Rogue in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
You just have to One: see it coming. Two: figure out it’s course and speed. And Three: put something in its path before it gets there.

At some point the amount of time and money one invests in making a sophisticated hyper-sonic weapon system exceedes that required to make unsophisticated kill devices that accomplishes one through three.

Deploying a few million ball bearings within a "probability cloud" of a sufficient diameter to encompass the max load factor (probably less than 10g) limited path of the vehicle.

13 posted on 12/13/2009 10:07:41 AM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
At some point the amount of time and money one invests in making a sophisticated hyper-sonic weapon system exceedes that required to make unsophisticated kill devices that accomplishes one through three. Deploying a few million ball bearings within a "probability cloud" of a sufficient diameter to encompass the max load factor (probably less than 10g) limited path of the vehicle.

So the shotgun approach.

Very valid, and a longer shot stream than your average 12GA.

I understand the concept. But your average clay pigeon isn't traveling at MACH 6+.

That's gonna be some shotgun to take that down. Not saying it can't happen, but the SCRAMjet is actually a fairly simple engine in theory. Which means that production wise, once we figure out the dynamics, materials etc., should be fairly simple and inexpensive to manufacture.

AI Targeting and flight control systems are the ones that would need to keep up. But no simple stinger/SAM are gonna take that baby down, even with a fragmentation warhead. I see the costs associated with defense of such devices, climbing.

14 posted on 12/13/2009 11:46:27 AM PST by AFreeBird (Going Rogue in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson