Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/11/2009 12:24:22 PM PST by Ed Hudgins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ed Hudgins

Because they can curl while waiting?


2 posted on 12/11/2009 12:25:56 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

But then the Canadians don’t really need a big bloated military since they will come running to the Americans if they are ever invaded. So naturally all those taxes have to go *somewhere*.

All in all I’d say health care in Ontario is run on par with how the U.S. govt runs the Post Office.


3 posted on 12/11/2009 12:29:55 PM PST by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

Because most people don’t have cancer and have to wait while their life passes before their eyes. For the every day ills, the system isn’t horrible.


4 posted on 12/11/2009 12:32:11 PM PST by florida red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins
Why aren’t more Canadians more upset about having to wait for health care?

Because everybody gets to wait the same amount of time?
5 posted on 12/11/2009 12:33:28 PM PST by Dr. Sivana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/waittime/index.html

Wait times for Manitoba.


6 posted on 12/11/2009 12:33:49 PM PST by bergmeid (obama. With a small o.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

they come to America for the medical care. Maybe they get it free too.


7 posted on 12/11/2009 12:34:38 PM PST by television is just wrong (one big ass mistake America!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

Didn’t the Canadian Supreme Court just this summer declare part of this Healthcare statute unconstitutional? I think it was mandatory single payer and no private companies issuing healthcare insurance policies.


9 posted on 12/11/2009 12:39:17 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins
Like suburbanites defending their local schools.
The Canadians just can't believe they have a deteriorating
medical system.
10 posted on 12/11/2009 12:39:18 PM PST by Hans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

Similar question:

“Why would Canadians want to stop global warming?”


11 posted on 12/11/2009 12:40:08 PM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

They don’t know any better. Have a few treatments on this side of the border, and then ask them how they like it. My guess is the poll numbers would be significantly different!


12 posted on 12/11/2009 12:45:30 PM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

Because they are afraid if the government didn’t provide health care, there would be no health care. Once you train people to be dependent, it can very very hard to teach them to be self-sufficient.


14 posted on 12/11/2009 12:51:55 PM PST by arista
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

Part of the problem is that Canadians are simply used to the waits, few if any could remember a time when there weren’t long waits for health care...same with the Brits. In the US health care consumers want treatment now and are generally getting it. They will be very dissatisfied when they suddenly have to wait weeks or months go through a massive bureaucracy to see a specialist or get advanced services.


20 posted on 12/11/2009 1:11:21 PM PST by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

Because we are brainwashed and have never known anything better.


21 posted on 12/11/2009 1:28:46 PM PST by Catholic Canadian ( I love Stephen Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins
The study found that “waiting time between referral from a general practitioner and treatment, averaged across all 12 specialties and 10 provinces surveyed” was about 16 weeks this past year.

I had serious abdominal cramps a couple of years ago. I endured it for a couple of days, then decided to go to my GP. He saw me right away, took an X-ray and immediately referred me to get a MRI. I drove myself to the MRI office (about 10 minutes) and withing a hour had my MRI done. They read it and referred me to the ER. I drove myself to the ER and proceeded withing a few hours had a room.

16 weeks????? That would suck. Mine was not serious enough to require an ambulance, but it would nohave taken long for it to get serious (I ended up staying in the hospital 12 days!)

22 posted on 12/11/2009 1:35:24 PM PST by Onelifetogive (Flame away...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins
To be fair, roughly one third of respondents in the Nanos poll mentioned above identified “waiting times for treatment / lack of accessibility” as our system’s key weakness. Another 14 percent thought the fact that there are “not enough doctors, nurses and/or personnel” was its number one failing.

Huh??? "The problem is not long waits, the problem is lack of doctors." "No, no, no. I disagree. There lack of doctors is not a problem, it is the long waits to see them that I dislike.

23 posted on 12/11/2009 1:38:35 PM PST by Onelifetogive (Flame away...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

Because it’s FREEEEEEEEE!


28 posted on 12/11/2009 3:21:28 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

Because they know no better. They are slaves in a tyrannical socialist state


29 posted on 12/11/2009 3:27:24 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Lukenbach Texas is barely there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Hudgins

My wife is from Canada. In early Oct, my Canadian MIL was advised by her Doctor that her cataracts were rapidly deteriorating and that she should have surgery quickly. Two days ago, a mere 9 weeks later, she saw the surgeon. She was advised that yes indeed, surgery on both eyes was in order, the sooner the better.

She was then given the first available surgical appointment – for May 2011 !!!

It’s not all bad though, they will try to get it done in Oct – Nov 2010, if she can agree to accept a last minute cancellation slot in either Edmonton, AB or Saskatoon, SK (2 ½ hour drive West or East). For this option, she gets to be on standby, ready to go for her surgery at any time, for a period of weeks or more.

Five years ago, she had her shoulder replaced. The diagnosis (left shoulder very painful, left arm essentially useless) took about 9 months, and then she waited over 2 more years before the surgery was actually performed.


30 posted on 12/11/2009 4:08:36 PM PST by brutuss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson