Posted on 12/10/2009 9:16:52 AM PST by ventanax5
In 1998, Californians voted to pass Proposition 227, the “English for the Children Act,” and dismantle the state’s bilingual-education industry. The results, according to California’s education establishment, were not supposed to look like this: button-cute Hispanic pupils at a Santa Ana elementary school boasting about their English skills to a visitor. Those same pupils cheerfully calling out to their principal on their way to lunch: “Hi, Miss Champion!” A statewide increase in English proficiency among all Hispanic students.
Instead, warned legions of educrats, eliminating bilingual education in California would demoralize Hispanic students and widen the achievement gap. Unless Hispanic children were taught in Spanish, the bilingual advocates moaned, they would be unable to learn English or to succeed in other academic subjects.
California’s electorate has been proved right: Hispanic test scores on a range of subjects have risen since Prop. 227 became law. But while the curtailment of California’s bilingual-education industry has removed a significant barrier to Hispanic assimilation, the persistence of a Hispanic academic underclass suggests the need for further reform.
(Excerpt) Read more at city-journal.org ...
BUT, they never taught us children. WHY?? We were Americans....all the way. No other reason!!
Actually, children ARE language sponges. It’s the easiest time of their lives to learn multiple languages. Teaching a Mexican child English only gets more difficult as they get older. Why do I know this and PHD’s do not?
A lot of PhD's are educated beyond their abilities and have lost any shred of common sense they ever had.
Excellent article! Thanks for posting.
Perhaps the PHD's have a vested interest in keeping the "underclass" under?
Regards,
GtG
Harder = more teachers, more books & more curricula written by PhDs. Easier = learn it naturally without special books or curricula. Hmmm.
That was laid to rest at the first big family gathering, including a few aunts, uncles, and cousins. The older generation, that of my future FIL & MIL, spoke Spanish amongst themselves. They spoke predominantly English to their children and grandchildren.
My last two years in Germany were much more enjoyable, thanks in large part to my confidence in my ability to speak the language. I'd often go out to eat with a friend and his wife-to-be (who spoke very little English), so we pretty much spoke German.
We had interesting conversations with several German friends. Wanting to shake off the rust on their English, they'd speak English to us, while we were speaking German. It was great fun.
Those abilities came in handy during the 1980 election. My neighbors were sure that Reagan was going to start WWIII, so they were pleading with me to vote for Carter. At the neighborhood gasthaus, I was able to give them a few American Civics lessons.
Assimilation is a must for a cohesive society.
People who refuse to assimilate do not need to be moving to the USofA. Period.
Because Muhammadanism is political, adherents cannot assimilate without apostasy. Therefore, they should not be allowed in the USofA unless they are willing to give up the political aspects of Izlam. Good luck with that.
They do know it, that just isn't their agenda. It is all about money, power, and control.
Bingo. Their English skills are often not nearly good enough to be employed as anything other than a teacher who teaches in Spanish.
My experiences as an ESL teacher include seeing victocrat American-born Mexican-descent teachers inflict Spanish and Mexican reconquista political and historical propaganda on ESL students. The ESL students were mostly not from Mexico, and about a third didn't speak Spanish.
BTTT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.