Charles Johnson, the Little Green Footballs guy?
This belongs in News/Activism. I want to watch godGutsGuns throw a conniption.
LOL, Holy crap, this even shoots the birth-certificaters. this wont be pretty!
Interesting. I think of Warmers as Flat-earthers.
The more we know, the more we know the GW scare was baloney, but they simply refuse to look at the evidence.
NEWSFLASH!
The “Global warming deniers” have science on THEIR side.
You’ve been setting new records for posting your drivel.
When can we expect your opus?
Good gravy, this reads like some kind of Olbermann stream of consciousness spew.
“The opinion of the earth’s motion is of all heresies the most abominable, the most pernicious, the most scandalous; the immovability of the earth is thrice sacred; argument against the immortality of the soul, the existence of God, and the incarnation, should be tolerated sooner than an argument to prove that the earth moves.”
- Father Melchior Inchofer, responding to Galileo
“It’s a principle in physics. It’s like gravity. It exists.”
- Al Gore
I read and thought Yes! The global warming power grap in Copenhagen. Then, I kept reading and the guy completely disappoints.
Dorworth, you are a Dick!
The earth IS flat. I’m looking out the window right now, and I tell you-the earth IS flat!
The earth isn’t flat, therefore Anthropogenic Global Warming deniers are wrong?
The earth isn’t flat, therefore Obama isn’t a Muslim?
The earth isn’t flat, therefore Obama was born in Hawaii?
This article marks a new low: especially considering it’s from a writer who all-too-obviously thinks he’s got that logic stuff cold.
“...not with trying to squeeze reality into the tiny, narrow, inflexible, dark confines of a (NATURAL) belief system predicated on faith...” Otherwise known as evolution...
I think the web of lies construed by by convoluting science into faith also applies to the warming scam. They are the flat-earthers, convinced of a lie because they want it to be so.
“—Global warming deniers: Led by head political cheerleader Sen. James Mountain Inhofe of Oklahoma, who regularly quotes the Bible to justify his political decisions, deniers are like creationists in that they confuse and/or conflate science with their beliefs, in this case economic beliefs.
—The Obama birthers: This conservative movement continues to maintain that Barack Obama is ineligible to be president of the United States because he wasn’t born in the United States, despite the fact and the documentation that he was. The Earth has always been round and Obama was always born in Hawaii.
—Obama-as-Muslim believers: This group is almost indistinguishable from the birthers and like them and the flat-Earthers ignores the evidence. The Earth has never been flat and Obama has never been a Muslim. (A pertinent aside: It is neither dishonorable nor dangerous to America to be a Muslim.) If it weren’t for the dangerous ugliness of the racism and fear of Islam that fuels these two groups, their deceits would be a joke. But, though their flat-Earth thinking is laughable, they are not. “
What?
Are you equating people who believe the earth is flat with people who believe or strongly question if Obama was born in Hawaii and NOT Kenya?
Tell me I missed something
I thought this link showed that Obama admitted being Mulim:
Or am I wrong on that?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzY
You mean like the atrocities committed by the French revolutionaries, ardent disciples of Voltaire and Rousseau? Not to mention their spiritual descendants the Nazis and commies?
What a bunch of &*&%$##@@!!!!
The Real Copenhagen Agenda: The U.N.’s climate chief tells all.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703939404574567921682049840.html
Phil Jones, director of the research program at the center of “climategate,” temporarily stepped down from his post Tuesday. And last week, Pennsylvania State University said it would launch an inquiry into the conduct of Michael Mann, one of its professors and perhaps the world’s most prominent paleoclimatologist.
Messrs. Jones and Mann have both been key contributors to the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The emails leaked from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit two weeks ago revealed, among many inconvenient truths, the corruption of the IPCC’s process of assessing climate science. Still, despite the probes into some of the IPCC’s key participants, the chair of that body insists nothing rotten is about to happen in the state of Denmark, where world leaders are set to debate sweeping policies based on IPCC conclusions.
“It is a very transparent, a very comprehensive process which insures that even if someone wants to leave out a piece of peer reviewed literature there is virtually no possibility of that happening,” Rajendra Pachauri told the Guardian on Sunday, adding that “people who are aware of how the IPCC functions and are appreciative of the credibility that the IPCC has attained will probably not be swayed by an incident of this kind.”
But the heightened awareness of the IPCC’s functioning seems precisely what now plagues the U.N.’s global warming frontman. So it’s not surprising that, for all his insistence that the group’s methods are spotless, he seems eager to change the subject from science. What he has chosen to talk about instead is instructive.
It seems what most concerns Mr. Pachauri now is not climatology, or glaciology, or oceanographybut the way we live. “Today we have reached the point where consumption and people’s desire to consume has grown out of proportion,”
Read more at online.wsj.com ...
“And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climatic change. To do that we need to get some broadbased support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This ‘double ethical bind’ we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both. “ - anthropomorphic global warming pimp,Stephen Schneider.(Quoted in Discover, pp. 4548, Oct. 1989)
The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience -Albert Camus
“Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God. -Benjamin Franklin
LOL = just look at the author of the article. It makes you wonder what’s a Dick Dorworth
Until it got to his list of other flats earthers, I honestly couldn’t tell if he was going to side with the AGW crowd or lambaste them.
Everything he said prior to the list could describe belief in AGW just as well...