Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats split over use of ‘party of no’
The Hill ^ | 12/8/2009 | Ian Swanson

Posted on 12/08/2009 8:32:24 AM PST by markomalley

Democrats are debating the tactic of labeling Republicans the “party of no.”

Senior strategists in the party argue the label at best has outlived its usefulness, and at worst will do nothing to win new Democratic votes in the 2010 elections.

“The Democrats are making an enormous mistake when they say the Republicans are the party of no,” said Paul Begala, the veteran Democratic strategist who worked in President Bill Clinton’s White House.

Democrats began describing the GOP as the party of no after every House Republican voted against the $787 billion economic stimulus bill in February.

The label has stuck in press releases, e-mails and public comments from Democrats in subsequent months as Republicans voted en masse in committee or floor votes against healthcare legislation in the House and Senate backed by President Barack Obama.

The risk to the message is that polls show a public split down the middle on the stimulus and healthcare reform. It is unclear whether voters will punish or praise Republicans for saying no to Democratic efforts on those issues.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: achillwind; america2point0; dissentispatriotic; dnctalkingpoints; obamunism; partyofno; pravdamedia; stalinisttactics; thebiglie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/08/2009 8:32:24 AM PST by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The economic stimulus bill is not working... no matter who voted for or against it....


2 posted on 12/08/2009 8:34:30 AM PST by JoanneSD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“Just say NO!”

I like it.


3 posted on 12/08/2009 8:34:35 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Begala is correct this one time - he’s still a putz - but he is right.


4 posted on 12/08/2009 8:34:50 AM PST by hometoroost (Obama clubs Navy SEALsB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Just keep taking polls until you get the response you want. I say canvas Berkley.


5 posted on 12/08/2009 8:35:33 AM PST by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I am a proud member of the party of NO!!!


6 posted on 12/08/2009 8:36:07 AM PST by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Label them because “No” is so evil....Keep it up you commies you’re simply destroying yourself with every prideful, greedy, stupid decision you make!


7 posted on 12/08/2009 8:37:15 AM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

I wish the Republicans were the party of no. They are actually the party of not quite so much.


8 posted on 12/08/2009 8:37:24 AM PST by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The party of “NO SOCIALISM” -there. problem solved.


9 posted on 12/08/2009 8:38:06 AM PST by joethedrummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
We certainly should say "no" to socialism and Big Government Health Care. There is nothing wrong with the word "no." It not used nearly enough. Never give in on principle. I intend to stay where I am for the rest of my life in respect to my beliefs.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

10 posted on 12/08/2009 8:38:57 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

As opposed to the Socialist-Democrat Party of “Da, comrade!”


11 posted on 12/08/2009 8:42:22 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Question authority!Who is the University of East Anglia to drive the 'Global Climate Change' agenda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

But Dissent is Patriotic...

Stalinist Revisionist History means never having to defend hypocrisy.


12 posted on 12/08/2009 8:44:35 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Question authority!Who is the University of East Anglia to drive the 'Global Climate Change' agenda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
You mean, the Dems vote on these things? - what latest new name or catch-phrase they're going to call us?

And the Republicans - what do they do? Any talking points from them? Any strategies to knock the Dems down a peg? No, I didn't think so.

13 posted on 12/08/2009 8:45:03 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

More bailouts. More taxes. More federal government.

I belong to the party of “HELL NO!”.


14 posted on 12/08/2009 8:50:37 AM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Say - why don’t label the Dem Party for what it really is: the Party of Murder, Treason and Socialism. Stick it in their faces and up their rear ends.


15 posted on 12/08/2009 8:55:04 AM PST by Noumenon (Work that AQT - turn ammunition into skill. No tyrant can maintain a 300 yard perimeter forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

Exactly! Not just “NO” but “HELL NO”.

The end of free markets and capitalism to become a completely socialist country.....HELL NO!

our Foreign policy in regard to Natl Security being one of submission....HELL NO!

Giving up our 2nd amendment right to defend ourselves and family....HELL NO!

Proud member of the “HELL NO” club!!!!!


16 posted on 12/08/2009 8:56:31 AM PST by Patriot4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: all the best

the party of “a little less”


17 posted on 12/08/2009 9:01:53 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Patriot4ever

I think it’s a great campaign slogan and could really catch on.


18 posted on 12/08/2009 9:01:55 AM PST by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

You left “Slavery” off your list; they’ve been pushing that for two centuries.


19 posted on 12/08/2009 9:04:15 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
He (Begala) says Republicans are the party of “colossal deficits and tax cuts for the wealthy,” not the party of no.

Mega-4-Head Begala is going to have to find a much bigger word than colossal to describe obama's deficits and his tax increases on everyone.

20 posted on 12/08/2009 9:07:53 AM PST by Right Wing Assault (The Obama magic is fading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson