Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cancer Death Rate Continues to Fall
WebMD ^ | Dec 7, 2009 | Salynn Boyles

Posted on 12/08/2009 4:43:04 AM PST by Pharmboy

Researchers Say More Cancers Are Being Detected Early or Prevented Through Screening

WebMD Health News Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD

Dec. 7, 2009 -- New cancer cases and the cancer death rate continue to fall in the U.S., driven largely by declines in lung, prostate, and colorectal cancers in men and breast and colorectal cancers in women.

For all types of cancer, new cases declined by nearly 1% a year between 1999 and 2006. During much of the 1990s cancer incidence rates were stable, after increasing steadily from the mid-1970s.

The cancer death rate -- the best predictor of progress against the disease -- has been falling for more than a decade and a half. Deaths from cancer declined by about 1% annually between 1993 and 2001 and 1.6% annually from 2002 to 2006.

Fewer Americans are smoking and more cancers are being detected early or prevented entirely through screening.

(Excerpt) Read more at webmd.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancer; mortality
All of you "we're living in a sea of cancer-causing toxins" folks--here's an inconvenient truth.
1 posted on 12/08/2009 4:43:04 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Coleus; aculeus; blam; SunkenCiv; decimon

Some progress being made ping...


2 posted on 12/08/2009 4:44:55 AM PST by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

That’s something Barry will change.


3 posted on 12/08/2009 4:46:15 AM PST by hometoroost (Obama clubs Navy Seals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hometoroost

Good point...certainly for those of us over the age of 60.


4 posted on 12/08/2009 4:50:54 AM PST by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hometoroost

Yep, got to kill off them old people so we can continue with the lies and make Barry dictator for life.


5 posted on 12/08/2009 4:53:44 AM PST by Tarpon (To destroy the people's liberties, you poison their morals ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
For all types of cancer, new cases declined by nearly 1% a year between 1999 and 2006.

There you go missing the obvious. Those were the years of a Republican congress.

6 posted on 12/08/2009 4:56:02 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Until obamacare passes.


7 posted on 12/08/2009 4:58:53 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

IMHO, nobody is smoking any more...


8 posted on 12/08/2009 4:59:06 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mo

That is a BIG factor, no question...


9 posted on 12/08/2009 5:01:07 AM PST by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

This can't be, ObamaKare hasn't passed yet, how WILL they have to spin this news...


10 posted on 12/08/2009 5:10:18 AM PST by MajorThomas (Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I've read some on how they come up with these statistics.

It seems that a person is considered cured of cancer if they live for five years after it was first diagnosed. If the same cancer is becomes active again, even a year before you die, and your death occurs five years and one day after it was first diagnosed, you are counted as cured.

I believe the article I was reading was about the US reducing the life after diagnosis years from seven to five so our statistics would be more in line with what the Europeans were using.

Statistics don't lie, but statisticians (and the politician that use them) do.

11 posted on 12/08/2009 5:49:07 AM PST by Texas Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Jack

I believe what you say is true, but the trend is there nonetheless.


12 posted on 12/08/2009 5:51:58 AM PST by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

“Cancer Death Rate Continues to Fall”

For now. Once 0bamaCare becomes law, watch for it to skyrocket. For the greater good, you know.


13 posted on 12/08/2009 6:20:53 AM PST by ScottinVA (The arrogance of this Congress is staggering. November 2010 can't get here quickly enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Jack

You are spot on with the 5 year survival concept. The newer
technologies that identify the cancers earlier increase the number of people with a six year survival rate. The six year survivors then die and radically alter the statistics without
improving the annual per capita death rate at all. The best example of this is: the breast cancer death rate in 1935 was 35 per 100,000. 60 years later the 1995 the breast cancer death rate was still 35 per 100,000. All of the treatment efforts over the sixty year period did nothing to alter the breast cancer
death rate.


14 posted on 12/08/2009 6:43:01 AM PST by kruss3 (Kruss3@gmail.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kruss3
Someone I know wanted me to donate to a breast cancer walk and had some statistics, so I compared them to the CDC's data and from what I could see, the improvement they were boasting didn't exist.

IMHO, modern breast cancer treatment is really barbaric. My friend was starved her last days. I'm still angry.

15 posted on 12/08/2009 7:22:06 AM PST by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Suz in AZ

Suz,

From my point of view it looks like early detection simply gives the practitioners more time to torture the gullible women (WITHOUT ANY MEANINGFUL LIFE EXTENSION). It is also
my understanding that oncologists do not recognize the precancerous calcification of smooth muscle tissue in milk ducts to be an active breast cancer.


16 posted on 12/08/2009 9:22:33 AM PST by kruss3 (Kruss3@gmail.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Cancer is an ugly, vile, hateful disease. I lost my dad and my sister to cancer.


17 posted on 12/08/2009 9:23:58 AM PST by Shire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shire

I am sorry to hear about this...truly. Indeed, there aren’t many families untouched by this disease.


18 posted on 12/08/2009 9:47:53 AM PST by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

They will rise again under the OCare.


19 posted on 12/08/2009 5:34:48 PM PST by TASMANIANRED
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson