... regardless (as already conclusively established) of how liberal, socialist or even unappologetically Marxist they may happen to be so far as legalized infanticide; wholesale and unconditional amnesty for tens of millions of illegal immigrants; or punitive, crippling tax rates, to name but three immediate issues, are concerned.
No, no. No need to illustrate further. You've rendered your position more than amply clear already, I assure you.
And then some.
Conservativegreatgrandma: “The short answer is YES, I will vote for any Republican running against any Dimocrat in a GENERAL election.”
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle: “... regardless (as already conclusively established) of how liberal, socialist or even unappologetically Marxist they may happen to be so far as legalized infanticide; wholesale and unconditional amnesty for tens of millions of illegal immigrants; or punitive, crippling tax rates, to name but three immediate issues, are concerned.”
++++++++++++++
We need to drive the Republicans away from these RINO/RAT positions. Clearly. We must be willing to vote against RINOs in both the primaries and the generals, however, given a sickening choice between a RINO and a RAT, I would prefer the RINO, but only after browbeating them for 6 to 12 months in the election process to move right (and they will move right) and for the next 2 to 6 years after the election.
Really though, the heavy lifting needs to happen in the precincts, county and state GOP meetings. If we take back the GOP at those levels, we won’t have these stupid, excruciating choices, nearly as much.
Are we ready to ACT?