Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I’m fixing to say I told you so (climate-gate scam)
The Monticello News ^ | Ted Dunagan

Posted on 12/02/2009 11:57:47 PM PST by Cedar

I’m fixing to say I told you so.

I told you that man made global warming was a scam, and now it has been exposed as exactly that.

In what has been coined as “Climate Gate,” due to the leaking of thousands of private e-mails from within the global warming priesthood centered within the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit in Great Britain, a pattern of manipulation, suppression and selection of data and evidence all designed to create and maintain the global warming myth has been discovered.

In other words they have been “cooking the books,” to make it appear global warming is being caused by human beings and predicting the world would warm to catastrophic levels unless trillions of dollars are spent to avert it.

Where would all this money come from? From obvious and underhanded carbon taxes, environmental fees and emission permit fees funded from increased energy and food costs, which would fall on every consumer and every shareholder, and is contained in the Cap and Trade (cap and tax) climate legislation which the U.S. Senate began open partisan debate on this week.

I must confess this close knit group of American and British scientists responsible for this, the greatest fraud of all time, have done an outstanding job using their influence in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming through their role in the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Some schools are actually teaching this false theory as fact.

After systematically refusing to release their data through open records, the hacked e-mails revealed these scientists trying to manipulate data through their computer programs to always point in only one desired direction—to lower past temperatures and to adjust recent temperatures upwards, in order to convey the impression of an accelerated warming.

Even more shocking is the revelation these scientists and academics have schemed and collaborated to silence any question of their findings, to have any dissenter or doubter drummed out of their profession, ridiculed and even accused them of thinking the world is flat.

The trio of treachery, science, academia and our own government, have convinced a lot of people that the burning of fossil fuel is destroying the earth, which is simply not true.

The truth is man has no control over the climate, and all that the cap and tax scheme will do is further destroy jobs, profits and future prosperity. Their global warming campaign is not about climate, or energy conservation.

It’s about power and cash, as evidenced by profiteers showing slide shows to our kids, making goofy movies and trying to funnel billions of dollars into their pockets.

Will these deceivers be called to account and treated as the Bernie Madoffs of the scientific and academic world? We shall see. In the meantime they’ll be plotting the spin they intend to put on their great deception, and they’ll all show up at the IPCC meeting in Copenhagen, scheduled for later this month. And the last I heard the president of the U.S. planned to attend.

But while they’re there concocting more lies, we’ll be fixing to know the truth.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climategate; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; globalwarmingscandal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Another good article on the exposed fraud. Republicans should keep this on the forefront.
1 posted on 12/02/2009 11:57:47 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cedar

Great summary article.


2 posted on 12/03/2009 12:08:24 AM PST by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedar
"I must confess this close knit group of American and British scientists responsible for this, the greatest fraud of all time, have done an outstanding job using their influence in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming through their role in the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). "

They had the help of every Commie/socialist/Democrat leader in the world and their complicit followers.

yitbos

3 posted on 12/03/2009 12:14:45 AM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

“I told you that man made global warming was a scam”

Anyone know exactly ‘when’ or ‘where’ the author first made that claim?

I mean, did he say this yesterday, or last month, or last year, or....?

From his declaration, you would think he was the only one that thought of it.


4 posted on 12/03/2009 12:20:26 AM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

“Some schools are actually teaching this false theory as fact.”

Well, for those of us who have fought the false philosophy and teaching of materialism (and materialistic evolution) for years, this should come as no surprise. Evolution has just been telling its lie louder and longer, with far more research money behind it.

But I digress.

In doing my own research on the hacked e-mails, I found this gem:

From: Phil Jones xxxxxxxx
To: John Christy xxxxxxxx
Subject: This and that
Date: Tue Jul 5 15:51:55 2005

“The scientific community would come down on me in no uncertain terms if I said the world had cooled from 1998. OK it has but it is only 7 years of data and it isn’t statistically significant.”

More text from that e-mail here: http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=544&filename=1120593115.txt

Link to complete .zip file containing all raw data files and e-mails here:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=U44FST89

These guys knew the earth was cooling, yet continued to defraud the public because they were afraid of the same kind of academic retribution they had seen foisted on others (and which they helped create), to push a political agenda and, most of all, to keep their grant monies coming in.

These people are detestable in the extreme and should prosecuted to the full extent of the law.


5 posted on 12/03/2009 12:24:05 AM PST by Stingray (Stand for the truth or you'll fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

You might could go through his archives. Most likely he has written about the subject before and declared global warming a hoax. I’m sure he knows he is not the only one who’s been saying it.

The message in the article is what’s important. As someone said earlier, it is a great summmary of the scam.


6 posted on 12/03/2009 12:25:46 AM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

ah, too many m’s....

“summary”


7 posted on 12/03/2009 12:27:15 AM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stingray

The link to download the zip file: You have to pay to get the file? That’s weird.


8 posted on 12/03/2009 12:34:39 AM PST by Rocky (Obama's ego: The "I's" have it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

No. Free download (at least it was when I got it). Just enter the text in the window at the right.


9 posted on 12/03/2009 12:41:23 AM PST by Stingray (Stand for the truth or you'll fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

Enter the code then wait for the timer to countdown. It’s still free.


10 posted on 12/03/2009 12:42:47 AM PST by Stingray (Stand for the truth or you'll fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Stingray; Rocky; All

hey guys,

to anyone interested, I have the file - it’s 61 MB in the zip format as downloaded by most everyone online when this fart first blew up the elevator.

I’ve compiled the emails into a word doc, it kicks in at under 11 MB in size. Great advantage is that it now becomes searchable by keyword.

If you guys want it, let me know via freepmail, will be glad to pass it along.

God Bless,

CGVet


12 posted on 12/03/2009 1:32:46 AM PST by CGVet58 (God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

“Even more shocking is the revelation these scientists and academics have schemed and collaborated to silence any question of their findings, to have any dissenter or doubter drummed out of their profession”

Exactly what has happened with Evolution/Creation.


13 posted on 12/03/2009 1:47:06 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stingray; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Candor7
E-MAIL TEXT.source

LOVE THIS ONE! IT'S THE SUN, STUPID!

So Far so good.

"Mathematica" first plots out the data itself (see Atachment 1)

The first part of the instruction set lets "mathematica" do a Fourier Transform on the data, ie. searching out the periodicities, if there are any. The result is shown on Attachment 2.

The transform result shows a sharp spike at the 11 year point (I wonder what is significant about 11 years?). The second part of the instructions now acts upon this observed spike (the Cos 11 bit), to extract it's waveform from the rest of the noise. The result is shown as a waveform in attachment 3, the waves having an 11-year period, with the long-term Sydney warming easily evident.

Attachment 4 shows the original Sydney data overlaid against the 11-year periodicity.

It would appear that the solar cycle does indeed affect temperature.

(I tried the same run on the CRU global temperature set. Even though CRU must be highly smoothed by the time all the averages are worked out, the 11-year pulse is still there, albeit about half the size of Sydneys).

Stay cool.

14 posted on 12/03/2009 2:08:19 AM PST by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

I take it as more self delusion than fraud or hoax. The greatest medical advance of the Twentieth Century was the double blind clinical trial.

The problem at CRU is more one of uncontroled acceptance bias, the normal human tendency to accept information that we are comfortable with and reject information that makes us uncomfortable. With all due respect, FR is a clinical example of acceptance bias.

Acceptance bias is not acceptable in science, because the entire point of the scientific method is to overcome the limitations of human psychology, to allow us to see the truth despite our prejudices, fears and hopes.


15 posted on 12/03/2009 3:43:04 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The CRU needs adult supervision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

William Herschel correlated wheat prices in London (a proxy for climate) with sunspot number over a span of a couple of centuries as far back as the late 1700’s.


16 posted on 12/03/2009 3:46:45 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The CRU needs adult supervision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cedar
The new term is "Climate Fraud".

I want reparations for any additional expense I have incurred as a result of any policy/tax or fee associated to the now proven false beyond a doubt (the debate is OVER) "Global Warming".

Anyone associated with perpetuating "Climate Fraud" to any degree should be punished for "crimes against humanity".

17 posted on 12/03/2009 4:23:11 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

18 posted on 12/03/2009 5:30:47 AM PST by MajorThomas (Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Despite the "all due respect" disclaimer of your acceptance bias comments, though suitably instructive in other ways, they don't seem to me to analogize appropriately between EAU and FR in that at FR, the guys at the top of the "bringin' in the grants" chain don't nix the contrary-evidence discussions, except in cases of abuse. Furthermore, FR movers and shakers have not to my knowledge evidenced outright fraud, a hook, I note, you didn't seem to leave as one of the possibilities for the CRU-related crowd.

You might reasonably refer to something like the Romney examples of late, which are, IMHO, a pre-emptive response to the type of abuses which have saddled the Republican presidential ticket with the likes of McLame. The cauldron of discussion that sorted all that out was very well represented by the spectrum of Republican (and other) input.

On the resonably instructive side of your comments, there is a certainly among FR members a raft of "less-thoughtful", predictable responders, who in typical parlance might be called "the choir." They do tend readily to "pile on".

Your insightful comments about the double blind clinical trial method and overcoming the limitations (and predispositions) of human psychology, are tremendously on-point, however. Thank you.

The crew@CRU had overwhelming career-advancing and financial incentives dangling before them. To suggest "self-delusion" would explain their behavior would typify excuse-finding, blame-minimizing psychologizing that has so muddied our legal system. The fraud clearly perpetrated by these hucksters, while fanned by the high and mighty from the Leftist political classes, has diverted hundreds of billions of dollars from useful purposes to entirely counter-productive ones while falsely destroying the professional careers of many of our highest-minded true scientists and presenting skewed examples to those still coming up through the ranks. That's more than mere self-convinced delusion at work there.

Many politicians, e.g. Babs Boxer, appear insufficiently prescient or savvy to let the crew@CRU be the fall-guys and extract themselves from culpabilty. Perhaps they are simply more guided by the Boutos Boutros-Ghali and Coffee Ananas examples of how UN scandals like Food-for-Oil have played out.

Leftist Media, Leftist politicians, Leftist academics (now there's a redundancy) and Leftist movers and shakers in the scientific world all seem to be punishably complicit in this greatest fraud of all time! I won't be excusing anyone just because the claim they were deluded.

HF

19 posted on 12/03/2009 7:00:35 AM PST by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

self delusion ?

Hardly....they had a very good clue what they were doing....and why is NASA James Hansen seemingly changing His tune...?

Climate scientist James Hansen hopes summit will fail ^

20 posted on 12/03/2009 7:10:50 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson