[w1andsodidwe]

"The e-mails do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus ... that tells us the Eearth is warming, that warming is largely a result of human activity," said another government scientist Jane Lubchenco.

That nasty little consensus thing again.

I have found a consensus among my fellow computer programmers that it is possible to manipulate data to show whatever result is requested.

The old "Garbage in, garbage out" is still valid.

[Blood of Tyrants]

The “consensus” thing is a lie and they know it. There are tens of thousands of scientists who DISAGREE. It’s like taking a poll on Obama’s popularity at the Washington DC CNN news room and declaring that 100% of America supports him.

[libertyhoundusnr]

I have yet to meet a credentialed scientist who buys off on this BS. Somehow the folks in the “consensus” group seem to have a pattern of heavy drug use in their background. It didn’t start with Gore and it won’t end with him either.

[an amused spectator]

I have found a consensus among my fellow computer programmers that it is possible to manipulate data to show whatever result is requested.

I've always found that the ol' "hard-coded subroutine just before you exit" ploy has ALWAYS given me the exact results that I've wanted...

[SeattleBruce]

“The e-mails do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus ...
+++++++++++++++++++++

Except to strongly undermine the science *and* the consensus. Ruh Roh...idiots...they are looking despearate and moronic as they try to build back up their house of cards...