Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Borneo1

If he owned the establishment, I would say bully for him.

He bought the franchise. Sonny’s still sets the rules.

If Sonny’s policy is to sell liquor, then he should abide by the policy. As for the religious shirts, that is not something sanctioned by Sonny’s.

Folks, as Christians we have to be reasonable. When you’re affiliated with a parent organization, you need to abide by that parent organization’s rules.

If this guy had enough money to buy the Sonny’s franchise establishment, he probably had enough money to open his own establishment or buy one where he could set his own policies. IMO, that’s what he should have done.

I don’t think Sonny’s acted improperly here. Sonny’s has a right to establish it’s own polices. A good Christian should abide by them, or avoid situations where they would have to.


5 posted on 12/02/2009 9:20:37 AM PST by DoughtyOne (A MELTING POT not a potters wheel. Join us. Don't try to turn this nation into the one you fled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

I don’t necessarily disagree with you. Still, the owner had the franchise for over 20 years and wasn’t required to sell alcohol. It just came up when he had to renew his franchise license. They wanted him to change. He didn’t want to change. He has never said anything negative about Sonny’s as far as I know. He just stuck to his beliefs and decided to go in a different direction rather than make the changes they required. I admire him for his actions.


8 posted on 12/02/2009 9:25:25 AM PST by Borneo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

He should sell the franchise rights and open his own business (he already has the training from the franchise).

Or, he could open a Chik-Fil-A - they’re a good Christian franchise company and worth supporting, I might add.


10 posted on 12/02/2009 9:30:04 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

Davis said his 20-year license for his Sonny’s franchise expired two years ago. He drove to Orlando to the Sonny’s headquarters in February 2008 to meet with officials there; he said the company offered a new agreement with the stipulation that he sell beer, wine and liquor drinks in the restaurant.

“I just told them we didn’t want to,” Davis said. “They didn’t understand because they acted like that was the future of restaurants.”

Davis also takes issue with Sonny’s disapproval of employees wearing clothing with American flags and Christian logos on them and with such items in the restaurant.

There was also a ‘Jesus’ memento/trinket on the shelf at the cash register. The T-shirts are not an approved uniform along and the ‘Jesus’ memento/trinket are not within Sonny’s System Standards,

Good for Davis! Jesus may not meet Sonny’s standards, but clearly He meets Davis’ standards!


12 posted on 12/02/2009 9:37:36 AM PST by Freddd (CNN is not credible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
If he owned the establishment, I would say bully for him. He bought the franchise. Sonny’s still sets the rules.

Most franchise conflicts have an exit clause. Those clauses are in place for just this situation. Our local Golden Corral franchisee ditched his franchise with an escape clause and runs the place pretty much the same way but with different food distributors and a new name, of course.

20 posted on 12/02/2009 10:02:47 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We're right! We're free! And we'll fight! And you'll seeeeeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson