Jacob Weisberg
Posted on 11/28/2009 5:43:30 PM PST by gusopol3
And while some advocates of the Democratic bills currently under consideration have tried to downplay the enormity of the changes the legislation would bring, Weisberg is entirely open about Obama's goal of nationalizing health care, expanding government, and undermining the legacy of Ronald Reagan
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
Huh. Go figure! I guess elections DO matter. ;)
Not that we’d be faring any better under McCain...
Man, this country is in a world of hurt!
Palin in 2012! Accept no substitutes (or RINOs)!
You betcha!
“You betcha!”
You betcha dittos!
Since all of Hussein's destructiveness is being accomplished by way of massive ACORN vote fraud — there should be no surprise when Americans start taking direct action to undo it.
I did a little reading over the weekend (very little) from 1993. It turns out that Reagan was George W. Bush even before George W. Bush was: the all-purpose enemy, the evil emperor to be defeated at all costs.
we can look at it on the bright side. this fool outed himself ala lambert as soon as he hit the stage. now we have three yrs to shore up our block.
Only and idiot could see Obama as brilliant. He’s a good speech reader, he’s been spoon fed cushy jobs his whole life, he’s deeply conflicted about his mulatto blood, and if it weren’t for affirmative action, he wouldn’t hold a job outside of fast food.
She’d be a paradigm changer if she’s able to redefine feminism; moving a bloc of Democrat adherents across the party divide would be much more the re-alignment than what Obama did in shoring up Dem blocs by recruitng an additional 10% of Democrat groups who had previously been non-participating.
McWho?
I nominate Weisberg.
On a sidenote, have you heard anything about the two Republican running against Feingold? Terrence Wall or Dave Westlake? Hopefully one of them will emerge. I know it's too early, but they're out there and we need to spread the word. Either one could be our Doug Hoffmann.
We're in a holding pattern now. And that's the hardest part. WE all know if the elections were held today, the dems would be smashed.
She’s been vetted to extremes. There is no more to learn about her past. Bambi’s camp shot the wad on that. Hopefully, she’s vetting obama. I finished her book last week, and McCain spent 50K on lawyers vetting her (and billed her for it). They knew Bristol was preggo and not too many knew it then.
Dems have been great haters for a long time, as long as I can remember.
Close to an illustration for the concept of the “banality of evil.”
We thought Reagan was put through the wringer, we thought W was put through the wringer worse than Reagan, we thought Palin’s wringer was extreme. We’re at a point today, you can’t damage anyone any more, what can they do to Palin? Sex, drugs, affairs, whore houses for gay men, unmarried teen daughters giving birth, gays: perhaps a pedophilia, only if it’s a republican, would be worse. We’ve sunk so low, low isn’t even relative anymore, it doesn’t matter. What can the GOP loose? They’ve got to take the leash off and let conservatives run. Like I’ve said before, Obama shot the wad vetting Palin, there isn’t any more out there. What, she didn’t feed her cat? The dems have sunk so low, we can only go up from here.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.