Browner says hacked e-mails don't change anything ["I'm sticking with the 2,500 scientists......]

Washington Times ^

[dalereed]

“Guess we might as well admit the earth is flat too.”

Of course it is!

The illegals would get worn out climbing uphill all the way to get here if ir wasn’t flat!

[JimRed]

"I'm sticking with the 2,500 scientists. These people have been studying this issue for a very long time and agree this problem is real," said Ms. Browner, who President Obama has tapped as his chief of policy on global warming.

"And besides, if I admit to the truth, I'll be out of a job."

[Freedom56v2]

“Both have to do with diminishing liberty and resource redistribution.”

Spot on! And remember that the Democrats have already budgeted for the billions & billions that they’d get from cap-n-trade to pay for their “free” health care. They can’t let this one go.

---

From what I have read, friends of the left on Wall Street, etc. stand to gain from the carbon credit exhanges that would be created.

[fightinJAG]

Isn’t this the Rather approach - fake, but accurate?

[Marine_Uncle]

I’d be an idiot to argue against your logic...

[avacado]

"From what I have read, friends of the left on Wall Street, etc. stand to gain from the carbon credit exhanges that would be created."

Oh heck yes they do! Carbon credits are nothing more than a commodity to be exchanged over and over for money. It's the new currency!

[GladesGuru]

Facts mean nothing to Commie Carol.

She was a disaster when she was in Florida, playing a significant role in transforming Florida into FloriDUH.

She is a committed believer in “Agenda Uber Alles”.

[Freedom56v2]

Reminds me of the old Eddie Murphy movie, Trading Places, The Duke brothers make a profit whether the commodity goes up or down—oh and they tampered with the data too. Very much like Cap and Trade today. :(

[avacado]

Reminds me of the old Eddie Murphy movie, Trading Places, The Duke brothers make a profit whether the commodity goes up or down—oh and they tampered with the data too. Very much like Cap and Trade today. :(

And they used a black guy as their sucker!

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Searching...finding stuff on Forums...and did find this:

BreitBart TV...‘Bigger Than ACORN’: Senator Launches Inquiry Into Leaked ‘ClimateGate’ Emails

Senator Inhofe is a true American Patriot and one of the few Conservatives that stands up! The rest should be ashamed of themselves.

[hyperconservative]

http://www.gcrio.org/gcact1990.html

U.S. Global Change Research Act of 1990
excerpt, “An Act To require the establishment of a United States Global Change Research Program aimed at understanding and responding to global change, including the cumulative effects of human activities and natural processes on the environment, to promote discussions toward international protocols in global change research, and for other purposes. “

Just a friendly FYI.

[Gondring]

A linear fit of all 11 years shows a cooling trend.

Since you don't see the point with the real climate data, here's a very quick simplified graph to illustrate why a linear regression trend taken from a statistical and physical anomaly is inappropriate handling of data. Note that this is an important consideration even if using a trend analysis technique like Mann-Kendall.

By your reasoning, I can claim that I have an 11-year (in magenta) downward trend of donut consumption, even though looking at the 10-year, 12-year lines, or whole dataset (navy) would give me a different result.

[Gondring]

So let's compare the last 11 years to the model predicitons of IPCC. What do we find? Useless models enginneered by useless sceintists showing zero correlation to the observed climate change while CO2 rises linearly.

That's why models are refined over time. If we threw out everything from any theory or model that failed, we'd have thrown out Continental Drift and not gotten to Plate Tectonics, for example.

I don't believe these are good models. I don't believe we know nearly as much about climate change as these "scientists" would claim. I also believe many of the sceptics overstate their claims against climate change. Both sides are acting politically, not scientifically, and both sides have honest scientists...who are acting scientifically despite their personal beliefs in what is actually happening.

Disclaimer: I am biased against Penn State's Earth System Science Center because of interactions with some of its personnel in the past.

[Cheerio]

Because they know they are NOT leaving via the ballot box. And they expect us to continue to peacefully and respectfully protest. IOW keep taking the shaft.

I hardily agree, and am not optimistic for a routing on Nov 2010. But I am cautious about posting my true feelings because I don't want to be banned nor do I want the Feds showing up at my door.

THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY OUT OF THIS TYRANNY.

[jwalsh07]

That's why models are refined over time. If we threw out everything from any theory or model that failed, we'd have thrown out Continental Drift and not gotten to Plate Tectonics, for example.

When a hypothesis is falsified it is falsified. Models are hypotheses. Their models have been falsified, they and perhaps you just don't accept it.

CO2 has risen linearly while temperatures have not risen at all for over a decade. The hypotheses that CO2 is responsible for Global Warming is thus falsified.

In point of fact the physics is such that any doubling of CO2 can only account for a couple of degress C of warming. No scientist has ever demonstrated any positive feedback and including high feedback gain in these models is a joke which is why the models predictions weren't even in the city that the ballpark is in.

Climate systems are not well understood which is why making predicitons about same is a fools game.

[avacado]

Look... has the global temperature for the past 11 years been going up or down?

Have a nice day.

[avacado]

Here is James Hansan's corrected GISS data from 2007. It shows that 7 of the 11 hottest years all occured beffore 1955 and the hottest years were in the 1920s.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.D.txt

Look at the black dots and not the red line 5 year smoothing. Clearly the equation for positive radiative forcing of CO2 is broken (3.5 X ln (X1/X0)

[mewzilla]

"I'm sticking with the 2,500 scientists.

Well, why not. The evidence is being destroyed as we type, isn't it, Ms. Browner....

Something you might want to keep in mind, however: You don't know that the hacker/leaker released everything he had. Destroying the data might not help, and just might lead to criminal charges being sought, especially if the hacker has more than he's shown so far.

I can't see any of these eggheads sacrificing themselves for the cause, can you...?

[Zman516]

Man-caused global warming is Browner’s religion, her ricebowl, her golden goose, her key to the vault, her ticket to political power. She is not about to give it up just because of the facts.

To her, this would be like someone telling a devout Christian
that it has been proven there was no Jesus.

[GWfan]

Your post made me think of the saying, “there are truly no weather forecasters, only weather historians.”