Posted on 11/24/2009 5:15:10 AM PST by opentalk
Media bias is one thing. But we have just witnessed one of the greatest scandals of modern science, and it barely made the front page of the New York Times.
Late last week we got the word: hackers broke into the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit server. The stolen emails and documents were later made public--and while the University claims that some of the emails may not be authentic, the scientists whose emails were hacked admit that they were the authors.
These emails and documents are indeed shocking. The blog Red State reports the highlights:
1. Prominent environmental scientists organize a boycott of scientific journals if those journals publish scholarly material from global warming dissidents.
2. The scientists then orchestrate attacks on the dissidents because of their lack of scholarly material published in scientific journals.
3. The scientists block from the UN's report on global warming evidence that is harmful to the anthropogenic global warming consensus.
4. The scientists, when faced with a freedom of information act request for their correspondence and data, delete the correspondence and data lest it be used against them.
5. The scientists fabricate data when their data fails to prove the earth is warming. In fact, in more than one case, scientists engaged in lengthy emails on how to insert additional made up data that would in turn cause their claims to stand out as legitimate.
Again: we're dealing with fabricated and deleted data, and an orchestrated effort to undermine global warming dissidents. Faked data in particular is a big deal: many politicians are using eco-alarmism based on fear of global warming to assault American freedoms. So what does this mean for America if it turns out that all that global warming was a sham all along?
(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...
Progressive media will do everything they can to keep this under wraps for as long as possible. FAR TOO MUCH has been invested to allow it to fall apart, especially before Obama uses climate change to sign away our sovereignty in Copenhagen.
And this is news because . . . . . . ??
The DBM has been ignoring TRUTH for how long, now??? We already know that they won’t do their jobs, that’s why the legacy media is in Dinosaur-land and conservative talkers and FNC are all on the rise - THEY’RE the only ones who will give the TRUTH!!!!
Somebody a lot smarter than me once said that in war, truth is the first casualty!!!
Media bias is one thing. But we have just witnessed one of the greatest scandals of modern science, and it barely made the front page of the New York Times.
No doubt about it; it is one of the greatest scandals of "so-called science". There is true science, but these yokels pushing the "anthropogenic global warming" mantra are not part of it...
See the video below for documentation of this.
Its one thing to gripe and complain about these things and disagree with it, but its quite another to convince your friends and neighbors and relatives and coworkers...
THEREFORE..., its also absolutely necessary for people to know the information in the following documentary. If there were simply one video that you could see and/or show people you know... this would be the one...
The following is an excellent video documentary on the so-called Global Warming I would recommend it to all FReepers. Its a very well-made documentary.
The Great Global Warming Swindle
If you want to download it, via a BitTorrent site (using a BitTorrent client), you can get it at the following link. Information about BitTorrent protocol and BitTorrent clients and their comparison at these three links (in this sentence). Some additional BitTorrent information here and here.
Download it here...
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3635222/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle
[This is a high-quality copy, of about a gigabyte in size. This link is the information about it, and you have to click the download link to get it on your BitTorrent client software. You'll also find users' comments here, too.]
Its worth seeing and having for relatives, friends, neighbors and coworkers to see.
Also, see it online here...
http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/great_global_warming_swindle.php
[this one is considerably lower quality, is a flash video and viewable online, of course..., and also, you can download flash video on a website either yourself or some software doing it.]
Buy it on DVD here...
[this would be the very highest quality version, on a DVD disk, of several gigabytes in size...] At Amazon, it seems to be high-priced now and have only a few copies right now.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000WLUXZE
At WAGtv (a UK shop), but don't know about shipping. The price is reasonable, though.
https://www.wagtv.com/product/The-Great-Global-Warming-Swindle-322.html
[And..., some information from WAGtv about this item.]
Also, in split parts on YouTube...
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 1 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TqqWJugXzs
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 2 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5rGpDMN8lw
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 3 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzFL6Ixe_bo
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 4 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNQy2rT_dvU
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 5 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dzIMXGI6k8
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 6 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GjOgQN1Jco
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 7 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHI2GfbfrYw
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 8 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7N9benJh3Lw
The Great Global Warming Swindle - Credits (Part 9 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_1ifP-ri58
That’s three fake Nobel peace prizes in five years.
Once again (too often now) I post the following:
‘READ MY TAG LINE’
I am so proud that the TIMES makes me look so smart!
The thing that nobody is talking about is that the supposedly “deleted” e-mails that the “scientists” are saying that they deleted, are, in fact, still in existence. The deleted them from their IN-BOXES, and from their COMPUTERS, but the e-mails are still archived in the system. The public should FOI the hell out of them! The “leaker” was sending us all a message!....................
The article , included a great summary of what was in the large amount of data released and the lack of ethics.
Get over it. THERE ARE NO RULES, only classes in intimidation. Admire the WINNER or sulk back to your bunker. Open another can of tuna. Maybe the last bottle of wine. Be convinced there is beauty in betrayal and know you are few.
Go back to sleep, now.
It is shameful that “respectable” newspapers and networks are devoting more time to the Gosselins, Taylor Swift and Twilight than to covering the story that could make or break our constitutional republic.
Beyond shameful it tells us what we always new about the lame stream media, they are in bed and on board as full time perpetraitors (spelling on porpoise) in the effort to destroy the Republic. They will do anything and everything they think necessary to carry out the mission.
These are environmentalist extremists with degrees in science.
3. The scientists block from the UN's report on global warming evidence that is harmful to the anthropogenic global warming consensus.
Yep. If all the data was entered into that infamous computer model which gave us the 'Hockey Stick' that *proved* man-made (anthropogenic) Global Warming, it would actually resemble more of a 'Pipe Organ' and blow the whole scam to smithereens.
I know a lot of you believe that most people in the news business are liberal. Let me tell you, I know a lot of them, and they were almost evenly divided this time. Half of them liked Senator Kerry; the other half hated President Bush.
CBSs Andy Rooney on the November 7, 2004 60 Minutes.
Click the picture:
You don’t need the media to tell you what you already know. Did the media expose dan blather? john kerry ? and the list goes on.
The old media is dead. Any politician that tries to pick up this exposed lie will be laughed at, yelled at, they will run from this mice from a cat.
Perhaps an encouraging note to the conspirators would help:
Michael Mann: mann@meteo.psu.edu
Phil Jones: p.jones@uea.ac.uk
...or journalism.
Yes, but the media, led by the New York Times, have always been reserved when it comes to leaked information.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.