Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shortage Slows a Program to Detect Nuclear Bombs-(fantastic)
nytimes ^ | November 22, 2009 | By MATTHEW L. WALD

Posted on 11/22/2009 8:46:55 PM PST by Flavius

The Department of Homeland Security has spent $230 million to develop better technology for detecting smuggled nuclear bombs but has had to stop deploying the new machines because the United States has run out of a crucial raw material, experts say.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bombs; hazmat; homelandsecurity; nuclearsecurity; nuclearsmuggling; proliferation; radiationdetection; radiationdetectors; security

1 posted on 11/22/2009 8:46:57 PM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Gee, maybe we can buy what we need from the CHINESE.


2 posted on 11/22/2009 8:49:43 PM PST by Mister Muggles (Seattle: a city full of liberal men with vaginas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

It’s a good thing the NYT doesn’t know.

They’d tell our enemies it’s safe to smuggle in nukes...


3 posted on 11/22/2009 8:50:03 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 305 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Remember now, Obama wants to let in the Nukes, both terrorist born and suitcase nukes from the Russian Federation/Neo-Soviet Union. He doesn’t want to anger a guy named Vladimir...


4 posted on 11/22/2009 8:58:05 PM PST by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Maybe they could do the same thing as they do for the 'shovel ready jobs'.... Just put up signs;

"NO NUKES ALLOWED"

5 posted on 11/22/2009 8:58:30 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Oh come on - Homeland Security’s spending too much going after vets and right wing Christians to have money for real terrorists... Besides the “PC” issues...


6 posted on 11/22/2009 8:59:00 PM PST by GOPJ (ObamaCare - slush fund scam that would make Bernie Madoff blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

This was completely foreseeable. Tritium has a half life of about 12 years. If no tritium is remove from the stockpile, after 12 years, half of it would be gone.

There are some other strategic questions this brings up too. I’m surprised they weren’t mentioned directly in the the NYeT imes.


7 posted on 11/22/2009 9:06:42 PM PST by DrDavid (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
“The government wanted 1,300 to 1,400 machines, which cost $800,000 each, for use in ports around the world to thwart terrorists who might try to deliver a nuclear bomb to a big city by stashing it in one of the millions of containers that enter the United States every year.”

1,400 detectors? Wow. They must really think that the treat of smuggles nukes is significant.

Remember the slogan during the “nuclear freeze” craze in the 1980s: One Nuclear Bomb can Ruin Your Whole Day?

It was meant to stoke fear of Reagan. Now the libes don't talk much about the treat since it might be insulting to Muslims.


8 posted on 11/22/2009 9:16:43 PM PST by garjog (Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Muggles
Mr. Miller estimated that demand for helium 3 was about 65,000 liters per year through 2013 and that total production by the only two countries that produce it in usable form, the United States and Russia, was only about 20,000 liters.

In other words, the government spent $230 million to develop a machine that needs an ingredient that is not obtainable on this planet even if Obama bows to Putin. Great work!

9 posted on 11/22/2009 9:29:25 PM PST by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt
This'll work:


10 posted on 11/22/2009 9:52:43 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"the United States has run out of a crucial raw material, experts say.'

Did they forget how to spell money?

11 posted on 11/22/2009 9:58:01 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt
That's exactly what I was thinking.

I don't know why the government has WASTED $230,000,000 in the first place when they could've gotten the same results and saved a TON of money just by issuing a prohibition and putting up these signs:

I mean, it works for guns, doesn't it?

12 posted on 11/22/2009 9:59:08 PM PST by john in springfield (One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe such things.No ordinary man could be such a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Helium 3 is rather abundant on the moon in minable quantities. Too bad we can’t get to it right now.


13 posted on 11/22/2009 10:04:51 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john in springfield

14 posted on 11/22/2009 10:26:10 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Paragraph on the source of Helium-3:

http://www.allsolarproducts.net/helium3-energy.html


15 posted on 11/22/2009 11:49:16 PM PST by givemELL (Does Taiwan Meet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Is it in underground pockets or where? Anything that got to the surface would be quickly gone in the moon’s near vacuum.


16 posted on 11/23/2009 12:04:35 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

It’s embedded in the lunar regolith on the surface.
Another H3 bonus is it can be used to fuel future fusion reactors. Assuming we make a sustainble fusion reactor breakthrough one day, I think that is likely. The stuff could end up quite the energy source. Harrison Schmitt the Apollo astronaut/scientist has done the homework and it could be an economically viable solution one day. Anyways the way things are going, China, India or Russia will be mining it all instead of us.

http://www.searchanddiscovery.net/documents/2004/schmitt/index.htm


17 posted on 11/23/2009 8:10:58 AM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Helium 3 is rather abundant on the moon in minable quantities. Too bad we can’t get to it right now.

............

That was one reason for the Chinese Lunar Program, mining Helium 3 for a future fusion reactor.


18 posted on 11/23/2009 8:18:22 AM PST by Ender Wiggin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: garjog
Remember the slogan during the “nuclear freeze” craze in the 1980s: One Nuclear Bomb can Ruin Your Whole Day?

I think Congress might need a less-than-good day once in a while. Sorta like term limits, but enforced. / sarc

19 posted on 11/23/2009 7:19:52 PM PST by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | America -- a great idea, didn't last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt
Just put up signs; "NO NUKES ALLOWED" ?

You bet. In Arabic and Farsi. That'll work!

20 posted on 11/23/2009 7:23:15 PM PST by EternalVigilance (We're witnessing the slow strangulation death of American republican self-government and liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson