Three words: BRING IT ON!
It’s precisely this kind of garbage coming out of the UN that illustrates why this totally useless and corrupt organization’s time has passed.
Support the Religion of Peace or I will kill you! No, this is not a joke. He means it.
Satan..you are gonna burn in hell for all eternity...Hope you enjoy it!
Islam=Satan
Have a good day.
Give it your best shot, knuckledraggers.
F***ing cave men.
GO TO HELL!
Jesus...
By every fiber of my being, I hate those vermin.
Be careful of what you say or the wrath of the U.S. court system may strike you down in a few hundred years and ruin your life!
That's an idiot's opinion, and a muslim at that (mohammed, SBUH).
But it's not nearly as much social unrest as actually killing people, slashing their throats, blowing them up, shooting them in their beds...
Read them and weep, sandmaggot!
From Audacity of Hope: “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
Barak Obama
I just farted in the direction of Mecca.
There, I feel better.
5.56mm
I would tell him: I don’t care: because we have resolve!
Rage on, boy, because I believe in FREE SPEECH. And I don’t believe in your religion, nor is your Allah the God of this Christians.
Remember the warning in Revelations about false prophets!
ON THE INTERNET:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/oic/index
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2390126/posts?page=42#42
Hey Muzzies, you and your pedophilic profit can STFU and take your cult to Hell where you belong.
“Nice world you guys got there. Wouldn’t want anything bad to happen to it.”
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iX2fakx508zGm4ff4XnCXYK260SwD9C2SQ401
AP Exclusive: Muslim countries seek blasphemy ban
By FRANK JORDANS (AP) – 4 hours ago
GENEVA
SNIPPET: “Failure to agree on a treaty would boost extremists in the Arab world, said Jazairy, a former envoy to Washington now considered a key player in the U.N.’s human rights forum.
“If we keep hitting this glass wall and say there’s nothing you can do about Islamophobia — you can do something about anti-Semitism but Islamophobia is out of bounds — you give an ideal platform for recruitment of suicide bombers,” he said.
On the Net:
U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom: http://www.uscirf.gov “
###
###
http://www.uscirf.gov/images/stories/pdf/uscrif_policy_focus_final.pdf
#
Note: The following text is a quote:
http://www.uscirf.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2819&Itemid=1
11/11/09: The Dangerous Idea of Protecting Religions from “Defamation”
A Threat to Universal Human Rights Standards
WASHINGTON, D.C. - In advance of the upcoming vote on this issue in the UN General Assembly, USCIRF today issued the following Policy Focus explaining the problems with the idea that religions should be protected from “defamation.”
Executive Summary
Over the past decade, countries from the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) have been working through the United Nations system to advance the problematic idea that there should be laws against the so-called “defamation of religions.” Although touted as a solution to the very real problems of religious persecution and discrimination, the OIC-sponsored UN resolutions on this issue instead provide justification for governments to restrict religious freedom and free expression. They also provide international legitimacy for existing national laws that punish blasphemy or otherwise ban criticism of a religion, which often have resulted in gross human rights violations. These resolutions deviate sharply from universal human rights standards by seeking to protect religious institutions and interpretations, rather than individuals, and could help create a new international anti-blasphemy norm.
In addition to seeking a new norm through these resolutions, OIC countries have argued in various UN contexts that existing international standards prohibiting advocacy of hatred and incitement already outlaw “defamation of religions.” However, the provisions on which they rely—Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and Article 4 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)—provide only limited exceptions to the fundamental freedoms of expression and religion. These provisions were intended to protect individuals from violence or discrimination, not to protect religious institutions or ideas from criticism, and they should not be expanded to cover allegedly religiously defamatory speech. Such an expansion, which unfortunately may have been lent support by new language on negative religious stereotyping and incitement in a recent UN Human Rights Council freedom of expression resolution, would undermine international human rights guarantees, including the freedom of religion. It also would undermine the institutions that protect universal human rights worldwide.
Please click here to download USCIRF Policy Focus - The Dangerous Idea of Protecting Religions from “Defamation”
USCIRF is an independent, bipartisan U.S. federal government commission. USCIRF Commissioners are appointed by the President and the leadership of both political parties in the Senate and the House of Representatives. USCIRF’s principal responsibilities are to review the facts and circumstances of violations of religious freedom internationally and to make policy recommendations to the President, the Secretary of State and Congress.
As my father said to me long ago...your religious beliefs are YOUR religious beliefs. It doesn't mean that anyone has to love or respect them.
To this gentleman, all I can say is, Muhammed was a pedophile, and had gay love for Allah as well.
A threat from Idriss Jazairy? Wonderful.
A religion that breeds suicide bombers does not deserve protection from anything. It deserves only destruction.