[allmendream]

When is Geology evolution? When, as with many other independent lines of evidence, it contradicts a young earth creationists timeline.

Evolution = any science that contradicts a creationist.

Astronomy = evolution when it speaks of billions of years, and hundreds of millions of years for light to reach us, and millions of years ages for stars, etc.

Geology = evolution when it speaks of the millions of years it takes to move continents that used to connect, when it speaks of features that would take millions of years to form, etc.

Radiometric dating = evolution.

Anthropology = evolution.

Gravity and Heliocentrism = evolution to our resident Geocentric Creationst FReepers.

Pretty much any science that doesn't support a six thousand or so year old Earth/ Universe is “evolution”; and that would be ALL of science that deals in any way with how old things are, or how they got to be the way they are.

Mutually independent lines of evidence having nothing to do with biological evolution? All “evolution” if it contradicts the weak of faith apologists who insist that “science must bend the knee” to their interpretation.

[colorado tanker]

This thread's already going gnarly, but may work for a catastophism ping.

[OldNavyVet]

Thank you for the heads up as to how Creationists “see” things.

Might we call it an ostrich syndrome?

[GodGunsGuts]

==Pretty much any science that doesn’t support a six thousand or so year old Earth/ Universe is “evolution”; and that would be ALL of science that deals in any way with how old things are, or how they got to be the way they are.

Hmmm...then how do you explain the following, dreamer? It would appear that your fellow evos are calling the data from all the scientific disciplines you mentioned above “evolution” as well. Imagine that.

http://www.tufts.edu/as/wright_center/cosmic_evolution/docs/splash.html