Thank you for the heads up as to how Creationists “see” things.
Might we call it an ostrich syndrome?
And it isn't just how they “see” things, it is, by their own words, how they describe them.
The Big Bang, thought by many Christians to be evidentiary support for the Biblical concept of the universe having an actual physical beginning (many thought the universe eternal), has been described by Creationists as “evolutionary Big Bang theory”, because it contradicts their timeline. I don't remember Astronomers factoring in Biological evolution through natural selection of genetic variation into their tabulations; but there you have it.
Interesting that you take an evos word for how creationists *see* things.
Do you always go by rumor and word of mouth?
Or did you ever think of checking with creationists themselves instead of accepting a biased take on something?