To: Alter Kaker
I decided to expose Darwin’s evo-religious creation myth ever since I discovered that it is not science.
To: GodGunsGuts
I decided to expose Darwins evo-religious creation myth ever since I discovered that it is not science.But let's burn the Doctors too. Rumor has it they all swear an OATH written by an ancient PAGAN Greek.
7 posted on
11/17/2009 7:41:13 PM PST by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: GodGunsGuts
James 5:12 ----
Above all, my brothers, do not swearnot by heaven or by earth or by anything else. Let your "Yes" be yes, and your "No," no, or you will be condemned.And yet Doctors all swear OATHS --- PAGAN oaths at that!
8 posted on
11/17/2009 7:43:16 PM PST by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: GodGunsGuts
Most doctors are also Evolutionists! And every year, new influenza strains EVOLVE. Are you catching my drift? Medical Doctors are the HIGH PRIESTS in the Temples of Hippocrates and Darwin!
9 posted on
11/17/2009 7:46:10 PM PST by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: GodGunsGuts
I decided to expose Darwins evo-religious creation myth ever since I discovered that it is not science.And you are still trying. Hopeless isn't it?
18 posted on
11/17/2009 8:07:11 PM PST by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: GodGunsGuts
I decided to expose Darwins evo-religious creation myth ever since I discovered that it is not science.And you are still trying. Hopeless isn't it?
19 posted on
11/17/2009 8:07:24 PM PST by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: GodGunsGuts
My experience has been somewhat different. I was in favor of ID being taught in schools as promoted by the Discovery Institute , but I didn’t pay much attention to the issue. As a lawyer, I was surprised at the Dover outcome and, for the first time, researched the legal side of Dover in detail. What I “discovered” was that the Discovery Institute was full of crap when it came to understanding the basic legal issues surrounding Dover. The DI’s articles after Dover reflected a complete misunderstanding of fundamental law. Since DI was way off base on something as simple as basic law, I questioned whether they had any credibility on something as complex as evolution. My research indicated that they did not have such credibility and I’m no longer in favor of “teaching the controversy.”
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson